Thread: OK Here is a Question to find the answer out to.

Which presidential candidates will openly say they are against the NAU and SPP?

I am sure Hunter would and I know Paul has.
What about the others? Should we call their campaign headquarters and find out. They can all talk till they are blue in the face about being against illegal immigration, but if they will not recognize the threat of the NAU they are hiding their true intentions.
I gaurantee that Guilliani is for it as he has financial interest in the Trans Texas Corridor.

I would love to see this brought up in a debate. Seeing that they all deny that it even exists.

Originally Posted by Paige

I would love to see this brought up in a debate. Seeing that they all deny that it even exists.

The sad part is it probably won't be brought up and it should be

OK I emailed Fred Thompsons sight with the question of "what is your position regarding the security and prosperity partnership with Mexico the US and Canada. If I get a response I will post it to you all. If I do not get a response I will call his campaign office on Wednesday. Anyone else willing to look into this with me?

Emailed Huckabee as well.

You rock rmsings.

You know what , I think I will call all of them Wed and ask their staffers
about this

Its much more fun making them squirm on the phone

I'll post what I find out also

Having vonage is a great thing if you like calling politicians

Unlimited long distance ROCKS!!

Originally Posted by PinestrawGuys

Unlimited long distance ROCKS!!

And its cheap to

I made so many calls during the senate hearings that some staffers know me by name

And you can bet some hate me big time

Kennedy , Durban and Fienstiens staffers come to mind

Fienstien had a really nasty one "Scott" if I remember right

Originally Posted by rmsings

Which presidential candidates will openly say they are against the NAU and SPP?

I am sure Hunter would and I know Paul has.
What about the others? Should we call their campaign headquarters and find out. They can all talk till they are blue in the face about being against illegal immigration, but if they will not recognize the threat of the NAU they are hiding their true intentions.
I gaurantee that Guilliani is for it as he has financial interest in the Trans Texas Corridor.

I would love to see them squirm if they were asked a question about the SPP, NAU, or NAFTA highway. I bet they would all CHUCKLE and not answer the question.

I know the MSM would NEVER ask that question during one of their debates. And most of the audience members have been specially chosen or are complete zombies, so I don't expect that question from them.