Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Husker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    the Christian Holy Town of Gretna, NE
    Posts
    790

    OSHA 2007-0032 could END ammunition sales

    I am shocked that this has TOTALLY gone under the radar. Public comment on this ends on the 12th (Thursday).

    OSHA wants to classify ammunition, powder and primers as explosives.

    In general terms, this means that gun ownership has been neutralized in the US (if this stands).

    There are some VERY big problems looming. Things like no ammo sales in an establishment selling guns?!?!? (NO S------T).

    Just thought I would toss this one out.

    (UPDATE), It appears that a 60 day extension has just been allowed. Now the extension will be until Sept 10 (hmm, what a date).

    I know this post is a little off topic for ALIPAC, but once our fire arms are gone, so is the country).

    H.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,087
    OSHA to revise explosives rule

    OSHA has issued a notice of proposed rulemaking to revise the Explosives and Blasting Agent standard and is accepting public comment on the proposed standard

    until July 12, 2007.

    The standard covers employees working in the manufacturing, storage, sale, transportation, handling and use of explosives. The proposal updates and clarifies the regulatory language, revises the standard to be consistent with other federal regulations, incorporates updated consensus standards, and provides the regulated community with more flexibility.

    Significant changes in the proposed rule include:

    Updating the definition of explosives so it is consistent with the Department of Transportation (DOT) definition
    Incorporating the DOT/United Nations-based classification system in the explosives definition
    Updating references to DOT regulations
    Requiring package labels to be in accordance with OSHA’s Hazard Communication standard and to use the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS)
    Eliminating storage magazine requirements because the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has adopted and enforces such regulations
    Adding provisions to ensure that employees are properly trained in hazard recognition and safe work practices
    Comments may be submitted electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, the Federal Rulemaking portal; by sending three copies to the OSHA Docket Office, Room N-2625, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210; or by fax to (202) 693-1648. Comments must include the docket number OSHA-2007-0032.

    http://www.cbia.com/hr/SafetyAndHealth/

    Don't know how you are supposed to comment on something you can't find! But will look further.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Husker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    the Christian Holy Town of Gretna, NE
    Posts
    790
    Here is a link http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Read.aspx?ID=3151

    There are many that can be found.

    H.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Ron Paul Land
    Posts
    1,038
    now this is scary and corsi talked about this last night that the 2nd amendment would be neutralized to disarm the american public..of course, this is a simple way to do it without actually amending the constitution...

  5. #5
    Senior Member SOSADFORUS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    IDAHO
    Posts
    19,570
    HUSKER IS THERE A LINK FOR THIS? WHERE DID THE STORY COME FROM?
    Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)

  6. #6
    Senior Member Husker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    the Christian Holy Town of Gretna, NE
    Posts
    790
    Black powder has been classified as a low grade explosive for a while, and within a year of that "change", it was about impossible to find it. There are some EXTREME rules for handling shipping and storing of BP. Yes, BP has been "replaced" with other "non-explosive" propellants (pyrodex, etc). However, the proposed changes will most likely impact ALL small arms ammunition sales much like it did with BP, and there will be NO replacement designed.

    Things such as you can not have possession of firearms in a commercial facility containing explosives will result in most firearms stores not being able to sell ammo. There are other significantly bad things to go along with this.

    This is EXACTLY what the UN is wanting to do to simply strip the guns out of US citizens hands (in other words, "F the 2nd amendment" in the UN's eyes).

    Time to stock up, for sure.

    H.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Husker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    the Christian Holy Town of Gretna, NE
    Posts
    790
    Quote Originally Posted by SOSADFORUS
    HUSKER IS THERE A LINK FOR THIS? WHERE DID THE STORY COME FROM?
    I just heard this on local talk radio. Link was provided above to NRA-ILA's write up. They just posted this new page today (the extension must have JUST happened, as I was doing some research while writing my original post).

    Google this: ohsa explosive ammunition
    or go to
    http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Read.aspx?ID=3151

    The proposed regs can be found at:

    http://www.nraila.org/media/PDFs/OSHA200700320001.pdf

    (NOTE the pdf is not from the osha site, but from NRA's site).


    H.

  8. #8
    Senior Member SOSADFORUS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    IDAHO
    Posts
    19,570
    Thanks husker!!

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    fedupinwaukegan needs help check out this link!!If you are anywhere near the conference great time to meet William from ALIPAC
    http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=F ... ic&t=68140

    National Organization Announces 'Shop in Waukegan Day' to Counter Illegal Alien Boycott

    http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=F ... ic&t=73007
    Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    1,149
    Docket ID OSHA-2007-0032
    Long Title EXPLOSIVES
    Document Information
    Document ID OSHA-2007-0032-0018
    Document Title Explosives; Extension of Comment Period
    How to Comment You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. OSHA-2007- 0032, by any of the following methods: Electronically: You may submit comments and attachments electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions on-line for making electronic submissions. Fax: If your comments, including attachments, do not exceed 10 pages, you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-1648. Mail, hand delivery, express mail, messenger or courier service: You must submit three copies of your comments and attachments to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. OSHA-2007-0032, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-2625, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202) 693-2350 (OSHA"s TTY number is (877) 889-5627). Deliveries (hand, express mail, messenger and courier service) are accepted during the Department of Labor"s and Docket Office"s normal business hours, 8:15 a.m.-4:45 p.m., E.T. Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and the docket number for this rulemaking (Docket No. OSHA-2007-0032). All comments, including any personal information you provide, are placed in the public docket without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA cautions you about submitting personal information such as social security numbers and birthdates. For further information on submitting comments, plus additional information on the rulemaking process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. Docket: To read or download comments and materials submitted in response to this Federal Register notice, go to Docket No. OSHA-2007- 0032 at http://www.regulations.govor at the OSHA Docket Office at the address above. All comments and submissions are listed in the http:// http://www.regulations.govindex, however, some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly available to read or download through that Web page. All comments and submissions, including copyrighted material, are available for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. For information on accessing exhibits referenced in the Explosives proposal, see the Public Participation heading in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. Electronic copies of this Federal Register document are available at http://www.regulations.gov. Copies also are available from the OSHA Office of Publications, Room N-3101, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202) 693-1888.This document, as well as news releases and other relevant information, also are available at OSHA"s Web page at http://www.osha.gov.
    you can go here to comment:
    http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main
    * in the first drop down list select OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health)
    * in the second drop down list select proposed rules
    *then hit the submit button
    You'll see a list of about 3 or 4 items, *select under the comments column on the third one down for Explosives, extended...
    *to add your comment.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Rockfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    From FLA to GA as of 04/01/07
    Posts
    6,640
    This will be the test to see if the Supreme Court will step up and defend the Constitution and our right to bear arms (they may say, sure, you can own guns, but where will amo for them come from?) Our Constitution must remain a higher authority than any external entity like the UN or any court appointed by the NAU. This is nothing short of a conspiracy and those architects should all be hung out to dry. The FTA and OSHA should be guided by the Constitution and not the UN, that's the problem right there.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •