Thread: Our Re-Focused Strategy?

Now that the elections are over, we all have to refocus our energies into our primary cause of ensuring that Legal Immigration is enforced. I am asking these questions so that all of us may gain some serious guidance and insight from other ALIPACers and so that we may press forward. We need to protect our borders and we need to stop the economic vampirism that has been perpetrated by Mexico's refusal to develop its own jobs and resources for its people.

1. How should we best approach the Obama Administration in regard to the issues of Illegal Immigration at hand?

2. Do you feel that the Obama Administration will open our borders and give away our Social Security and if so, how may we best best counteract any such measures through our Congressional leaders if such measures are proposed or enacted?

3. Do you feel that the Obama Administration will sanction a North American Union that will enable Mexico to pass laws over us and if so, how do we counteract such a sanction through our Congressional leaders if they are proposed or enacted?

4. Is ALIPAC archiving as much information as possible in regard to criminal activities of Illegal Aliens and is this information being compiled for reports or propositions? If so, what can ALIPACers do to assist?

5. What can we do to stop ongoing harrassment by LaRaza and other racist organizations who are concerned only with moving ahead with their Socialist/Marxist agendas? Should we be in more direct contact with our Congressional Leaders in regard to it all? Should we make the actions of such organizations more public?

These are only a few questions I have at this point, but I should like other ALIPACers to make as many suggestions as possible so that we may continue to forge ahead with our concerns and cause.

Thank you.

I started a thread earlier that relates to yours if that helps too but im with you we need to evolve in the way the public perceives our message. I mean that's how obama won it wasn't what he has done or what he will do it was the way people perceived his ideas! You can get anyone to eat a crap sandwich as log as you change their perception of it!

http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-137248.html

The economy will be the first priority, with businesses laying off and closing, insourcing and outsourcing. I am sure Obama realizes the relationship between decreasing job opportunities and increasing population pressure. No matter what was said on the campaign trail, in the next few weeks he and his team will get a good idea of what has been going on behind closed doors with the GWB gang.
I am glad he has hit the ground running and the most important thing we can do is pound on the economy-population point.

1. The Obama administration will be heavily influenced by groups like: unions, ethnic organizations, liberal religious groups, academics. They think they have achieved "Unity" that will wash away every hurt......don't think so! If they could see what the outcome of this new Supersociety is----1 billion US residents by 2100, planning and replanning of neighborhoods and communities, huge impact on natural resources---they might think twice. There are better ways to do things, believe me. A lot of ordinary people in these groups don't swallow all of this c==p, but the leaders practically demand it. But let's see how fast Obamamania burns out.
2. I think there will be pressure on the Social Security system. We need to let people know that programs like SSI are already being pillaged and that totalization with Mexico is VERY risky. Too risky.
3. This a touchy area. A certain level of cooperation might be very beneficial. But even liberal groups, which usually oppose NAFTA, might get alarmed at this. Technically and officially NAFTA opponents don't condone mass immigration---despite compulsions to assist it--- and many have gone on record against the SPP and NAU. I even picked up a flyer recently from one group. On paper they oppose NAFTA-caused immigration but it is all intertwined with their human rights and justice views.
4. Just for a suggestion: I have been utilizing official news releases from ICE and Customs and Border PAtrol.
http://www.ice.gov/pi/news/newsreleases/
http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/newsroom/news_releases/
But there is a lot more info out there. Also usdoj.gov/dea has info on drug fugitives.
5. I think get acquainted with laws that protect you. I am not sure, in a society that protects vigorous debate, just where the lines are drawn. This would be a subject worth exploring--by experts who should know.

Hope that helps.

Originally Posted by vortex

The economy will be the first priority, with businesses laying off and closing, insourcing and outsourcing. I am sure Obama realizes the relationship between decreasing job opportunities and increasing population pressure. No matter what was said on the campaign trail, in the next few weeks he and his team will get a good idea of what has been going on behind closed doors with the GWB gang.
I am glad he has hit the ground running and the most important thing we can do is pound on the economy-population point.

There you go. It's the economy stupid. You bring in more people and Americans are laid off and out of work, do you think Obama and Pelosi is that stupid to undermine the American citizen? Obama, MAYBE no. Pelosi is that stupid so is Menendez.

Not that it will cause him to rethink his mushy-middle positions, but I'm going to send the following piece to Hewitt, if nothing else, to irritate him - President Obama, Thanks George: www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=773

Originally Posted by POTUS

Not that it will cause him to rethink his mushy-middle positions, but I'm going to send the following piece to Hewitt, if nothing else, to irritate him - President Obama, Thanks George: www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=773

I assume you're referring to name-dropper extraodinaire Hugh Hewitt. If so, good Send it along!

Hewitt is weak on illegal immigration, and is now pushing Paul Ryan to lead the GOP in the House. From what I can tell, at least in terms of illegal immigration, Ryan would not be the best choice.

Originally Posted by Populist

Originally Posted by POTUS

Not that it will cause him to rethink his mushy-middle positions, but I'm going to send the following piece to Hewitt, if nothing else, to irritate him - President Obama, Thanks George: www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=773

I assume you're referring to name-dropper extraodinaire Hugh Hewitt. If so, good Send it along!

Hewitt is weak on illegal immigration, and is now pushing Paul Ryan to lead the GOP in the House. From what I can tell, at least in terms of illegal immigration, Ryan would not be the best choice.

Absolutely, Populist, Hugh the "respectable conservative" Hewitt, who is absolutely clueless as to why the GOP's fortunes have been dropping like a rock. The fact that he's backing someone who is weak on the immigration issue for House leadership, is consistent with where he's always really been on this issue.

So basically, Mr. Hewitt is part of the globalist Open Borders Lobby then? Doesn't sound like a conservative to me. Sounds like a neocon.

Originally Posted by patbrunz

So basically, Mr. Hewitt is part of the globalist Open Borders Lobby then? Doesn't sound like a conservative to me. Sounds like a neocon.

I think that's an accurate assessment, Pat. Hewitt practically has a hissy fit, anytime a caller brings up the North American Union scheme, which he declares is non-existent, and he refused to have Jerome Corsi on to discuss his book on Obama, saying that the book wasn't accurate, and calling Corsi a "nutter" because Corsi believes the NAU is real.