Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Super Moderator GeorgiaPeach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    21,835

    Pat Buchanan: Why the CFR is Apopletic

    http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/why-the-cfr-is-apoplectic/

    Please post the article at the link. Thank you,
    Matthew 19:26
    But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
    ____________________

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)


  2. #2
    Super Moderator GeorgiaPeach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    21,835
    Alipac has expressed concern over CFR and over those connected to the group, such as Heidi Cruz, wife of Senator Ted Cruz.
    Matthew 19:26
    But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
    ____________________

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)


  3. #3
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    NEW WORLD DISORDER
    Why the CFR is apoplectic

    Pat Buchanan cites intervention decisions 'most Americans wish we could take back'
    Published: 1 day ago

    Pat Buchanan was twice a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination and the Reform Party's candidate in 2000. He is also a founder and editor of The American Conservative. Buchanan served three presidents in the White House, was a founding panelist of three national TV shows, and is the author of 10 books. His latest book is "The Greatest Comeback: How Richard Nixon Rose From Defeat to Create the New Majority."

    “Isolationists must not prevail in this new debate over foreign policy,” warns Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations. “The consequences of a lasting American retreat from the world would be dire.”

    To make his case against the “Isolationist Temptation,” Haass creates a caricature, a cartoon, of America First patriots, then thunders that we cannot become “a giant gated community.”

    Understandably, Haass is upset. For the CFR has lost the country.

    Why? It colluded in the blunders that have bled and near bankrupted America, and that cost this country its unrivaled global pre-eminence at the end of the Cold War.

    No, it was not “isolationists” who failed America. None came near to power. The guilty parties are the CFR crowd and their neocon collaborators, and liberal interventionists who set off to play empire after the Cold War and create a New World Order with themselves as Masters of the Universe.

    Consider just a few of the decisions taken in those years most Americans wish we could take back.

    After the Soviet Union withdrew the Red Army from Europe and split into 15 nations, and Russia held out its hand to us, we slapped it away and rolled NATO right up onto her front porch.

    Enraged Russians turned to a man who would restore respect for their country. Did we think they would just sit there and take it?

    How did bringing Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia into NATO make America stronger, safer and more secure? For it has surely moved us closer to a military clash with a nuclear power.

    In 2014, with John McCain and U.S. diplomats cheering them on, mobs in Independence Square overthrew a pro-Russian government in Kiev that had been democratically elected and installed a pro-NATO regime.

    Putin’s response: Secure Russia’s naval base at Sevastopol by retaking Crimea, and support pro-Russian Ukrainians in Luhansk and Donetsk who preferred secession to submission to U.S. puppets.

    Fortunately, our interventionists failed to bring Georgia and Ukraine into NATO. Had they succeeded, we almost surely would have been in a shooting war with Russia by now.

    Would that have made us stronger, safer, more secure?

    Like the reporting you see here? Sign up for free news alerts from WND.com, America’s independent news network.

    After the attack on 9/11, George W. Bush, with the nation and world behind him, took us into Afghanistan to eradicate the nest of al-Qaida killers.

    After having annihilated some and scattered the rest, however, Bush decided to stick around and convert this wild land of Pashtuns, Hazaras, Tajiks and Uzbeks into another Iowa.

    Fifteen years later, we are still there.

    And the day we leave, the Taliban will return, undo all we have done and butcher those who cooperated with the Americans.

    If we had to do it over, would we have sent a U.S. army and civilian corps to make Afghanistan look more like us?

    Bush then invaded Iraq, overthrew Saddam, purged the Baath Party and disbanded the Iraqi army. Result: a ruined, sundered nation with a pro-Iranian regime in Baghdad, ISIS occupying Mosul, Kurds seceding and endless U.S. involvement in this second-longest of American wars.

    Most Americans now believe Iraq was a bloody trillion-dollar mistake, the consequences of which will be with us for decades.

    With a rebel uprising against Syria’s Bashar al-Assad, the U.S. aided the rebels. Now, 400,000 Syrians are dead, half the country is uprooted, millions are in exile, and the Damascus regime, backed by Russia, Iran and Hezbollah, is holding on after five years.

    Meanwhile, we cannot even decide whether we want Assad to survive or fall, since we do not know who rises when he falls.

    Anyone still think it was a good idea to plunge into Syria in support of the rebels? Anyone still think it was a good idea to back Saudi Arabia in its war against the Houthi rebels in Yemen, which has decimated that country and threatens the survival of millions?

    Anyone still think it was a good idea to attack Libya and take down Moammar Gadhafi, now that ISIS and other Islamists and rival regimes are fighting over the carcass of that tormented land?

    “The Middle East is arguably the most salient example of what happens when the U.S. pulls back,” writes Haass.

    To the CFR, the problem is not that we plunged headlong into this maelstrom of tyranny, tribalism and terrorism, but that we have tried to extricate ourselves.

    Hints that America might leave the Middle East, says Haass, have “contributed greatly to instability in the region.”

    So, must we stay indefinitely?

    To the CFR, America’s role in the world is to corral Russia, defend Europe, contain China, isolate Iran, deter North Korea, and battle al-Qaida and ISIS wherever they may be, bleeding our country’s military.

    Nor is that all. We are also to convert Syria, Iraq, Libya, Yemen and Afghanistan into pro-Western preferably democratic countries and embrace “free trade,” accepting the imported merchandise of all mankind, even if that means endless $800 billion trade deficits, bleeding our country’s economy.

    Otherwise, you are just an isolationist.

    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/why-the-c...AST54JKrO1R.99
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Similar Threads

  1. Pat Buchanan: A Brief for Whitey
    By SicNTiredInSoCal in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-15-2013, 01:09 PM
  2. Pat Buchanan ~ Why are we still in Korea?
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-29-2010, 12:57 AM
  3. The New GOP by Patrick J. Buchanan
    By Texas2step in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-27-2009, 10:32 PM
  4. Pat Buchanan
    By Mamie in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 04-26-2006, 07:14 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •