Thread: Romney endorsements

Originally Posted by ALIPAC

These endorsements are one of the main reasons Romney is not on our AMNESTY list yet. That combined with the fact we owe him for lighting the fire in the debates by attacking Rudy on immigration and the return fire accusations about sanctuary mansion are weak.

We have also left Romney on the viable list, for now, because we want to deliver a defeat to Huckster (who was up 10 points before we started) and show the power of this issue before we approach the campaigns again.

That being said, Romney's stances and record are about to go under intense scrutiny from ALIPAC and it remains to be seen if the Romney campaign will be added to or remain off of the AMNESTY list.

W

I take it that you are not toooo much of a Romney fan.

-Rep. Jack Kingston of Georgia (career grade A+ from Numbers) has also endorsed Romney.

http://grades.betterimmigration.com/tes ... &VIPID=208


-Bay Buchanan (sister of Pat and Tancredo's campaign advisor) also endorsed Romney.

And don't forget that the National Review endorsed Romney, as well as David Keene, President of the American Conservative Union. The NR played a big role in helping to defeat the amnesty bill this past summer.

Originally Posted by Populist

And don't forget that the National Review endorsed Romney, as well as David Keene, President of the American Conservative Union. The NR played a big role in helping to defeat the amnesty bill this past summer.

Excellent points!

Originally Posted by Populist

-Rep. Jack Kingston of Georgia (career grade A+ from Numbers) has also endorsed Romney.

http://grades.betterimmigration.com/tes ... &VIPID=208


-Bay Buchanan (sister of Pat and Tancredo's campaign advisor) also endorsed Romney.

Good points Populist.

Originally Posted by BrightNail

tancredofan,

why are all your posts about Romney - and why is his name in ALL your subject lines. Its getting sorta weird.

I know you are supporting him because tancredo is endorsing him, but is this considered "general news" or what?

I don't know. I can post a hundred times with Headlines about Ron Paul and what is going on with events and such, but I abstain from being too overbearing...

I mean, can you honestly say you do not have agenda with what you are doing? I am not trying to create issue - I am just very curious as to your motivation.

I think Tancredofan is ignoring you Brightnail!!

It appears now that Bay Buchanan has become a spokes person
for Romney

I have seen her on several news shows promoting him this weekend

Originally Posted by usanevada

It appears now that Bay Buchanan has become a spokes person
for Romney

I have seen her on several news shows promoting him this weekend

It's good to see that Bay Buchanan is supporting Gov. Romney.

Yes and Judd Gregg senator from my state of NH has also endorsed Mitt. You all remember Judd Gregg? He was one of the few who still voted for amnesty even after many people jumped shipped after we overloaded the switchboards and voicemail boxes.

Everyday for at least the last week, Judd Gregg has been running full page ads in the local NH paper endorsing Romney. To me, that only hurts Romney with people who are truly against amnesty. You think the campain would be smarter.

Nicole

Originally Posted by Bren4824

Originally Posted by ALIPAC

These endorsements are one of the main reasons Romney is not on our AMNESTY list yet. That combined with the fact we owe him for lighting the fire in the debates by attacking Rudy on immigration and the return fire accusations about sanctuary mansion are weak.

We have also left Romney on the viable list, for now, because we want to deliver a defeat to Huckster (who was up 10 points before we started) and show the power of this issue before we approach the campaigns again.

That being said, Romney's stances and record are about to go under intense scrutiny from ALIPAC and it remains to be seen if the Romney campaign will be added to or remain off of the AMNESTY list.

W

I'm curious.......Are you also going to examine Ron Paul's stances and record??

Particularly the fact that he has NO plans on going after employers or holding them accountable-----ESPECIALLY based on his past voting records!!!

He voted against Duncan Hunters' 2005 fence/border security bill.

Also, look at this.............This should DEFINITELY be of concern, being that he currently has no plans for going after employers or holding them accountable in any way!!

Nearly doubled H-1B foreign
high-tech workers in 1998
Rep. Paul helped the House pass H.R.3736. Enacted into law, it increased by nearly 150,000 the number of foreign workers high-tech American companies could hire over the next three years. Although the foreign workers receive temporary visas for up to six years, most historically have found ways to stay permanently in this country. Rep. Paul voted for more foreign workers even though U.S. high tech workers over the age of 50 were suffering 17% unemployment and U.S. firms were laying off thousands of workers at the time.


Voted in 1998 to allow firms to lay off Americans
to make room for foreign workers
Before the House passed the H-1B doubling bill (H.R.3736), Rep. Paul had an opportunity to vote for a Watt Substitute bill that would have forbidden U.S. firms from using temporary foreign workers to replace Americans. Rep. Paul opposed that protection. The substitute also would have required U.S. firms to check a box on a form attesting that they had first sought an American worker for the job. Rep. Paul voted against that. The protections for American workers fell 33 votes short of passing.

Here we go again.....