Results 11 to 20 of 32
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
03-21-2008, 11:41 AM #11
AmericanMe wrote:
These 3 candidates represent America at it's very worst!!!"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**
Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttps://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
03-21-2008, 02:24 PM #12
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Posts
- 214
Originally Posted by MW
He sure would make a damn good VP for McCain. I might actually be able to pull the lever for McAmnesy if that were the case.
-
03-21-2008, 09:03 PM #13
I would at this point throw my vote away and pull the lever for Nader.
Is there any feasable way to write in (Tancredo/ or Ron Paul0 at this point? I have legs and can deliver fliers. I'm sure a lot of others out there can too.
We have been blocked out of the main stream media but xerox ciopes are cheap.
The pen is mightier than the sword or gun.
Let's see if it still holds.
-
03-21-2008, 10:09 PM #14
A couple of Libertarian activists I spoke with after my debate on illegal aliens a few weeks ago claim that Bob Barr is going to get the LP nod. If that's the case, then I'll be voting for him-presuming, of course, that he's on the New York ballot.
OT, has anyone posted the story about a Colombian women who was coerced into sex in order to obtain a green card?Reporting without fear or favor-American Rattlesnake
-
03-21-2008, 11:54 PM #15
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Posts
- 492
Originally Posted by MW
In regard to the Demas..........Maybe Jim Webb (Virginia) or Shuler (the Save ACT Dem from NC---I think NC).
-
03-21-2008, 11:56 PM #16
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Posts
- 492
Originally Posted by 5
-
03-22-2008, 08:47 AM #17
I'm Ron Paul all the way. He is still in the race and hopefully when McCain fails his psychological evaluation, Paul will get the nomination.
-
03-22-2008, 12:38 PM #18
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 1,009
Constituion Party
Originally Posted by BearFlagRepublic
I will not consider voting for the Libertarian's Party's candidate. The Libertarian Party essentially believes in unlimited legal immigration. It opposes the enactment of further sanctions against employers that hire illegal aliens.
-
03-22-2008, 01:13 PM #19
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- Fenton, MI
- Posts
- 727
Originally Posted by Shapka
I will not stay home. That is perfectly acceptable to the elitists that run the country.
All of us should be out in our neighborhoods, helping get local candidates elected too. Turn out is far higher in an Presidential election year than it is in an off year."Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost." -- John Quincy Adams
-
03-22-2008, 01:22 PM #20
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- Fenton, MI
- Posts
- 727
Originally Posted by Dolly3275
I suspect that he won't sign it because it moves to increase government surveillance on the citizens. Paul believes that a government that protects freedom and liberty is the higher priority.
We understand you disagree with him. We however, believe that his plan is better - reduce the size of government welfare, and they'll go home.
In short, the SAVE act increases the size of government and also the scope of their power. We small government types don't like that solution, when there are better ways.
Paul is not going to run, so it is not revelant anyway.
THe Libertarian platform is open borders. I won't support that.
The Constitution Party has some First Amendment issues that trouble me, but I could consider them because I don't think the SCOTUS would uphold any legislation they managed to pass.
If Bob Barr runs, I will probably vote for him."Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost." -- John Quincy Adams
Laura Loomer - Woke up this morning to a @nytimes article...
03-27-2024, 11:36 PM in General Discussion