Thread: Election Fraud? Obama Won More Than 99 Percent Of The Vote In More Than 100 Ohio Prec

Election Fraud? Obama Won More Than 99 Percent Of The Vote In More Than 100 Ohio Precincts

By Michael, on November 11th, 2012

Barack Obama received more than 99% of the vote in more than 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio on election day. In fact, there were a substantial number of precincts where Mitt Romney got exactly zero votes.

So how in the world did this happen?

Third world dictators don’t even get 99% of the vote.

Overall, Mitt Romney received 30.12% of the vote in Cuyahoga County. There were even a bunch of precincts in Cuyahoga County that Romney actually won. But everyone certainly expected that Cuyahoga County would be Obama territory. And in most of the precincts that is exactly what we saw – large numbers of votes for both candidates but a definite edge for Obama. However, there are more than 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County where the voting results can only be described as truly bizarre.

Yes, we always knew that urban areas would lean very heavily toward Obama, but are we actually expected to believe that Obama got over 99% of the votes in those areas? In more than 50 different precincts, Romney received 2 votes or less. Considering how important the swing state of Ohio was to the national election, one would think that such improbable results would get the attention of somebody out there. Could we be looking at evidence of election fraud hidden in plain sight?

Perhaps if there were just one or two precincts where Obama got more than 99% of the vote we could dismiss the results as “statistical anomalies” and ignore them.

But there were more than 100 precincts where this happened in the most important swing state in the nation.

Maybe there is some rational explanation for the numbers that you are about to see. If there is, I would really love to hear it.

What makes all of this even more alarming is that there were reports of voting machine problems during early voting in Ohio. It was being reported that some voters were claiming that they tried to vote for Romney but that the voting machines kept recording their votes as votes for Obama…

“I don’t know if it happened to anybody else or not, but this is the first time in all the years that we voted that this has ever happened to me,” said Marion, Ohio, voter Joan Stevens.

Stevens said that when she voted, it took her three tries before the machine accepted her choice to vote for Romney.

“I went to vote and I got right in the middle of Romney’s name,” Stevens told Fox News, saying that she was certain to put her finger directly on her choice for the White House.

She said that the first time she pushed “Romney,” the machine marked “Obama.”

So she pushed Romney again. Obama came up again. Then it happened a third time.

“Maybe you make a mistake once, but not three times,” she told Fox News.

The numbers that you are about to see are quite dramatic. They come straight from the website of the Cuyahoga County board of elections. Once again, I am not alleging that election fraud has actually taken place. What I am saying is that these numbers look very, very strange and that somebody needs to start asking some questions.

Posted below are voting results from the presidential election from various precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio. If you wish to verify these numbers, you can do so right here. In each case, the specific precinct is identified first, followed by the number of votes for Obama and then the number of votes for Romney.

In this first set of Cuyahoga County precincts, Mitt Romney received exactly zero votes in each instance…

0154 CLEVELAND -02-Q: 542 - 0
0192 CLEVELAND -04-L: 388 - 00204 CLEVELAND -05-E: 597 - 00205 CLEVELAND -05-F: 483 - 00206 CLEVELAND -05-G: 257 - 00219 CLEVELAND -05-T: 386 - 00228 CLEVELAND -06-H: 405 - 00232 CLEVELAND -06-L: 70 - 00233 CLEVELAND -06-M: 419 - 00241 CLEVELAND -06-U: 118 - 00248 CLEVELAND -07-F: 361 - 00273 CLEVELAND -08-J: 472 - 0
0280 CLEVELAND -08-Q: 49 - 00285 CLEVELAND -09-B: 414 - 00288 CLEVELAND -09-E: 478 - 00523 EAST CLEVELAND -04-C: 486 - 0Are we actually supposed to believe that not a single person wanted to vote for Mitt Romney in any of those precincts?

But wait, there’s more.

In this next set of results we get to see many of the precincts where Mitt Romney received exactly one vote…

0118 CLEVELAND -01-A: 438 - 10144 CLEVELAND -02-G: 532 - 1
0183 CLEVELAND -04-C: 548 - 1
0185 CLEVELAND -04-E: 522 - 10190 CLEVELAND -04-J: 434 - 10200 CLEVELAND -05-A: 364 - 10217 CLEVELAND -05-R: 357 - 1
0240 CLEVELAND -06-T: 148 - 10272 CLEVELAND -08-I: 473 - 10274 CLEVELAND -08-K: 382 - 1
0276 CLEVELAND -08-M: 492 - 1
0279 CLEVELAND -08-P: 378 - 10284 CLEVELAND -09-A: 320 - 1
0287 CLEVELAND -09-D: 394 - 10289 CLEVELAND -09-F: 468 - 10290 CLEVELAND -09-G: 400 - 10303 CLEVELAND -10-C: 471 - 10312 CLEVELAND -10-L: 363 - 10314 CLEVELAND -10-N: 340 - 10315 CLEVELAND -10-O: 473 - 10512 EAST CLEVELAND -02-D: 437 - 10513 EAST CLEVELAND -02-E: 359 - 11040 WARRENSVILLE HTS -02-A: 523 - 11041 WARRENSVILLE HTS -02-B: 514 - 1Do these numbers look believable to anyone out there?

Now let’s look at some of the Cuyahoga County precincts were Mitt Romney received exactly two votes…

0120 CLEVELAND -01-C: 531 - 20128 CLEVELAND -01-K: 470 - 20136 CLEVELAND -01-S: 635 - 20147 CLEVELAND -02-J: 541 - 2 0148 CLEVELAND -02-K: 632 - 20149 CLEVELAND -02-L: 531 - 20153 CLEVELAND -02-P: 564 - 20155 CLEVELAND -02-R: 509 - 2
0187 CLEVELAND -04-G: 491 - 20188 CLEVELAND -04-H: 508 - 20194 CLEVELAND -04-N: 520 - 20211 CLEVELAND -05-L: 461 - 20213 CLEVELAND -05-N: 324 - 20222 CLEVELAND -06-B: 637 - 20225 CLEVELAND -06-E: 505 - 20226 CLEVELAND -06-F: 342 - 20234 CLEVELAND -06-N: 244 - 20236 CLEVELAND -06-P: 438 - 2
0249 CLEVELAND -07-G: 446 - 20250 CLEVELAND -07-H: 358 - 20251 CLEVELAND -07-I: 445 - 20253 CLEVELAND -07-K: 429 - 20256 CLEVELAND -07-N: 433 - 20262 CLEVELAND -07-T: 363 - 2
0269 CLEVELAND -08-F: 463 - 20270 CLEVELAND -08-G: 516 - 20278 CLEVELAND -0: 405 - 20302 CLEVELAND -10-B: 452 - 20311 CLEVELAND -10-K: 476 - 20511 EAST CLEVELAND -02-C: 319 - 20515 EAST CLEVELAND -03-A: 359 - 20516 EAST CLEVELAND -03-B: 459 - 20519 EAST CLEVELAND -03-E: 293 - 20526 EAST CLEVELAND -04-F: 517 - 20625 HIGHLAND HILLS -00-A: 377 - 2 These numbers look even more bizarre when you start comparing them with the overall results from the rest of Cuyahoga County that you can find right here.

The results from most of the precincts look very much like what you would expect from a competitive national election.

But there are more than 100 precincts where the results look incredibly suspicious. Here are some more precincts where Barack Obama won more than 99% of the vote…

0119 CLEVELAND -01-B: 558 - 40121 CLEVELAND -01-D: 452 - 30122 CLEVELAND -01-E: 671 - 50123 CLEVELAND -01-F: 704 - 60124 CLEVELAND -01-G: 543 - 30126 CLEVELAND -01-I: 674 - 40127 CLEVELAND -01-J: 687 - 40130 CLEVELAND -01-M: 781 - 40132 CLEVELAND -01-O: 615 - 40133 CLEVELAND -01-P: 733 - 50134 CLEVELAND -01-Q: 753 - 60135 CLEVELAND -01-R: 697 - 5
0142 CLEVELAND -02-E: 434 - 30145 CLEVELAND -02-H: 571 - 30150 CLEVELAND -02-M: 503 - 40151 CLEVELAND -02-N: 601 - 3
0152 CLEVELAND -02-O: 621 - 30156 CLEVELAND -02-S: 471 - 40157 CLEVELAND -03-A: 489 - 30184 CLEVELAND -04-D: 576 - 3
0186 CLEVELAND -04-F: 572 - 3
0189 CLEVELAND -04-I: 503 - 30191 CLEVELAND -04-K: 508 - 40193 CLEVELAND -04-M: 497 - 40195 CLEVELAND -04-O: 599 - 30196 CLEVELAND -04-P: 443 - 30199 CLEVELAND -04-S: 686 - 50203 CLEVELAND -05-D: 569 - 40207 CLEVELAND -05-H: 341 - 30210 CLEVELAND -05-K: 427 - 30212 CLEVELAND -05-M: 340 - 30216 CLEVELAND -05-Q: 461 - 40218 CLEVELAND -05-S: 515 - 50221 CLEVELAND -06-A: 701 - 30223 CLEVELAND -06-C: 462 - 40227 CLEVELAND -06-G: 401 - 30230 CLEVELAND -06-J: 475 - 40254 CLEVELAND -07-L: 447 - 40261 CLEVELAND -07-S: 449 - 40271 CLEVELAND -08-H: 552 - 40275 CLEVELAND -08-L: 499 - 30282 CLEVELAND -08-S: 517 - 40292 CLEVELAND -09-I: 423 - 40294 CLEVELAND -09-K: 445 - 4
0307 CLEVELAND -10-G: 428 - 40317 CLEVELAND -10-Q: 446 - 30320 CLEVELAND -10-T: 654 - 50510 EAST CLEVELAND -02-B: 401 - 40518 EAST CLEVELAND -03-D: 374 - 30520 EAST CLEVELAND -03-F: 457 - 30521 EAST CLEVELAND -04-A: 453 - 41045 WARRENSVILLE HTS -04-B: 598 - 41049 WARRENSVILLE HTS -06-B: 480 - 4Once again, perhaps there is a rational explanation for all of this.

But I find it really hard to believe that one candidate would get more than 99% of the vote in more than 100 precincts in one of the most important counties in the most hotly contested swing state of the 2012 election.

Unfortunately, we may never know the truth about these election results. We are just told that we can trust the voting machines and that we can trust whatever results they end up spitting out at us.

Look, I don’t know what the truth is, but where there is smoke there is usually fire. Voters reported tens of thousands of voting problems on election day, and it will be an absolute disgrace if those complaints are brushed under the rug now that the election is over.

Setting aside who won or who lost, the legitimacy of our elections if of the utmost importance. If we cannot even trust the ballot box, what do we have left?

I sincerely hope that authorities in Ohio and in the other swing states will investigate some of the voting “irregularities” that are being reported.

Millions of Americans are watching, and if all of this just gets swept under the rug there are going to be a whole lot more people that will lose faith in these voting machines.
I know that I already have.




Election Fraud? Obama Won More Than 99 Percent Of The Vote In More Than 100 Ohio Precincts

It looks like they didn't count everything....
Week later, more than 300,000 Ohio votes remain uncounted

November 13, 2012 | 2:13 pm

The presidential election results in Ohio were close: According to still-unofficial figures from the Secretary of State, Barack Obama won the state with 2,690,841 votes to Mitt Romney’s 2,583,582 votes — a winning margin of 107,259 votes for the president. In percentage terms, that is 50.18 percent of the vote for Obama, and 48.18 percent for Romney.

But those numbers will change. Remember when, before the election, many observers discussed the possibility the results could be decided by the large number of provisional ballots that might be cast in Ohio? Well, those provisional ballots were cast, and they have not yet been counted. Neither have a significant number of absentee ballots. Together, the number of uncounted ballots is larger than Obama’s margin of victory.

According to the Secretary of State, there are 204,927 uncounted provisional ballots and 119,535 absentee ballots, for a total of 324,462 ballots. That is roughly three times the president’s 107,259-vote winning margin.

“The official canvass starts on the 17th of this month,” says Matt McClellan, a spokesman for the Ohio Secretary of State. “There will be no updated numbers until the counties have certified their results, which could be as late as the 27th.” That means no provisional or absentee ballots will be counted until at least the 17th, and no announcements until days after that. In fact, some absentee ballots are still being received; Ohio law says they will be counted if they arrive by November 16, as long as they were postmarked by November 5.
Not all provisional or absentee ballots will be counted. They are subject to challenge and often contain mistakes made by voters or poll workers. In 2008, Ohio issue 206,859 provisional ballots, and in the end 166,870 were counted. If that rate were to hold this year, that would mean the same number of provisional ballots, about 165,000, will be added to the vote totals.

As for absentee ballots, in 2008 the state issued a total of 1,744,753 of them, and 1,717,256 were counted — a fairly high percentage of valid ballots.

So this year, if the number of outstanding ballots is greater than Obama’s victory margin, it is at least theoretically possible that the Ohio results could change. A look at the location of those outstanding ballots, however, suggests the outcome will stay the same.
The largest number of outstanding ballots, about 60,000, is in Cuyahoga County, which Obama won by 69 percent to 30 percent. Another 49,000 ballots are out in Franklin County, which went for Obama 60 percent to 38 percent. In Hamilton County, which Obama won by 52 percent to 47 percent, there are about 25,000 outstanding ballots.

Romney-friendly counties have fewer outstanding votes. Butler County, for example, which Romney won 62 percent to 36 percent, has about 9,000 provisional and absentee ballots. Clermont County, which Romney won 67 percent to 31 percent, has about 4,000 outstanding ballots. Licking County, which Romney won 56 percent to 42 percent, has about 5,000 outstanding ballots. There do not appear to be enough outstanding ballots in pro-Romney places for Romney to make significant progress in the final count, and in the end Obama’s lead might actually increase.

You can check the numbers for county-by-county turnout as well as absentee and provisional ballots here
http://www2.sos.state.oh.us/pls/enrp...5891004::NO:::
and here.
http://www2.sos.state.oh.us/pls/enrp...dent,Statewide


Week later, more than 300,000 Ohio votes remain uncounted | WashingtonExaminer.com