Thread: The United States of America is wounded and Liberals, Muslims,Homosexuals & Communist

The United States of America is wounded and Liberals, Muslims,Homosexuals & Communists want to finish her off – Part Two

RichardAnthony •10/22/2014 News, Opinion, Politics

In part one , I spoke about how useful idiots like liberals were doing their part to drag America down.
In this part I’ll talk about how Muslims and Homosexuals want to accomplish this .
Now, what I find most interesting about these two groups is, that they both have more in common with each other than either one realizes. But here is one major common factor that they both can agree on ; they BOTH want to destroy Christianity in the United States.
Muslims are more open in their approach, their religion teaches them to either CONVERT people not of their faith..or, simply KILL them if they will not submit to Islam. Homosexuals, on the other hand, are more insidious about their methods, they put up a false narrative about how they simply want their “rights”. To be honest…I have more respect for the Muslim Jihadist’s , with them at least there are no mistakes as to their intentions. There is no subterfuge with Muslims, they say openly and proudly that it is their duty to convert the entire world to Islam and they’ve been attempting in one way or another , to do this since the 7th Century AD.
Muslims also want to be able to practice Sharia Law where ever they are . Sharia law is not compatible with most European democracy’s, neither is it compatible with our own Constitution. Muslims believe that Sharia is the only “law” and all other law, is invalid.
Interestingly enough, most LGBT groups, or gay activist’s are virtually silent when it comes to Islam , homosexuals always go after the softer target of Christianity and Christians. Because they know that if they openly attack Islam, or Sharia , the consequences could be fatal . Islam does NOT “tolerate” homosexuality under any circumstance. In fact in most Muslim countries,homosexuals are put to death by hanging, stoning, or are beheaded. If a so-called “gay activist” wanted to impress me as to the validity of his or her “struggle”, they would openly fight against both Islam and Sharia law.

But, strangely they don’t. They know that to do so, would be a death sentence. No , LGBT’s go after the softer targets, like little old ladies and Christian pastors . We’ve seen evidence of exactly that kind of persecution recently in Houston Texas. The lesbian mayor of that city is unlawfully attacking the Christian clergy there, because they dare to disagree with her.
Both groups are doing everything in their power to destroy the religious and moral fabric of the United States of America. Because, no matter what Barack Hussein Obama says, WE ARE A CHRISTIAN NATION. Muslims didn’t build SQUAT in America, they moved in after the fact. And no matter what LGBT’s say…”Marriage” is, and always HAS been, between a MAN and a WOMAN.
But, thanks to assistance from liberals, progressives and the DNC, “tolerance” for both Islam and homosexuality, is not only being forced down our throats at the point of a court order or a gun, but they have managed to infiltrate out educational system and they are “teaching” this blasphemy to our children in our own public school system. Homosexuals, as a rule cannot “breed” (except lesbians), so they have to “recruit”. So , the “grooming” process has to start when our children are young and at their most impressionable. Islam has also infiltrated our school system and thanks to Islamic front groups like CAIR, they are using our own Constitution to THEIR advantage (of course muslims and homosexuals are getting help from liberal activist judges).
And let’s not forget…BOTH groups are also getting plenty of assistance from Barack Hussein Obama.
Make no mistake ladies and gentlemen, Islam and homosexuals do NOT want to simply “coexist” with us ,they BOTH only have one goal …total destruction and complete submission of Christianity and the American people. A place where no dissent is allowed, or will be tolerated.
Muslims want to turn America into a Caliphate, where Sharia is the only law and homosexuals want to turn America into a giant gay bath house, where every sexual perversion and sexual deviancy is considered absolutely “normal”.


Next time in part 3, I’ll delve into how Communism is playing it’s part in the destruction of America .

http://universalfreepress.com/the-un...-off-part-two/

Federal judge swims upstream: No constitutional right to gay 'marriage'

Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com) Thursday, October 23, 2014

The Windsor opinion did not create a fundamental right to same gender marriage nor did it establish that state opposite-gender marriage regulations are amenable to federal constitutional challenges. If anything, Windsor stands for the opposite proposition: it reaffirms the States’ authority over marriage, buttressing Baker’s conclusion that marriage is simply not a federal question.

A federal judge and his court decision have given new hope that traditional marriage will survive legal attacks by homosexual activists and sympathetic judges.
What is the strongest legal argument against homosexual 'marriage'?

Marriage not in Constitution so it's a state issue'Equal protection' doesn't mean two men can get marriedCreates a 'no boundaries' precedent (e.g., polygamy)
VoteView Results

U.S. District Court Judge Juan Perez-Gimenez, in fact, suggested that other judges have taken liberty with the Windsor decision that was used by the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act.


Perez-Gimenez

Reading from the judge's rule, Ryan Anderson of The Heritage Foundation pulled out the following quote in a Daily Signal story:

The Windsor opinion did not create a fundamental right to same gender marriage nor did it establish that state opposite-gender marriage regulations are amenable to federal constitutional challenges. If anything, Windsor stands for the opposite proposition: it reaffirms the States’ authority over marriage, buttressing Baker’s conclusion that marriage is simply not a federal question.

Joe Grabowski of the National Organization for Marriage says a favorite quote from the judge's ruling is that it takes "inexplicable contortions of the mind, or perhaps even willful ignorance…to interpret Windsor's endorsement of the states' control of marriage as eliminating the states' control of marriage."

The left responded in a predictable manner, such as left-wing website Slate calling the decision "a comically inane opinion."



Perez-Gimenez also questioned if loosening marriage laws would allow more liberal norms of marriage, such as polygamy, a point which was also mocked by the left. But a Joel Pollack story at Breitbart News reported the federal judge addressed such criticism in his ruling:

Such questions do not arise from "cruel discrimination and ridicule," [the judge] says, but are legitimate and demand that proponents of a "right" to gay marriage "render reasons justifying the change and articulate the principles that they claim will limit this newly fashioned right."

Perez-Gimenez is only the second federal judge out of approximately 30 to rule in favor of state marriage laws. Homosexual activists have won overwhelmingly with the argument that such laws "discriminate" against gays, which they argue violates the Equal Protection Clause.

Graboski says Puerto Rico is in the First Circuit Court of Appeals, which will likely rule on the judge's findings.

OneNewsNow has reported in recent months that pro-family groups and homosexual activists expect the U.S. Supreme Court to eventually rule on the issue.

http://onenewsnow.com/legal-courts/2...e#.VEocZxZqkus