Thread: Washington's Weakness Invites Mexican "Refugee" In

Washington's Weakness Invites Mexican "Refugee" Invasion
By Brenda Walker

Any Mexican considering a run for El Norte must be watching with interest the preparations of American authorities for a possible meltdown of our southerly narco-state neighbor.

Washington is not fortifying the US perimeter, as common sense and the national interest would indicate—it’s fluffing the pillows and heating the coffee. From afar, it must look downright welcoming.

In Austin, Texas state officials have expressed public concern about whether they have sufficient chow should a couple million Mexicans show up for lunch. More generally, Washington is now repackaging as a “refugeeâ€

Washington is not fortifying the US perimeter, as common sense and the national interest would indicate—it’s fluffing the pillows and heating the coffee. From afar, it must look downright welcoming.

Any fortification of the border will not be congruent with the formation of the NAU. Interests want any excuse to merge our 3 nations, if not then 2, in order to capture an endless stream of cheap labor, among other reasons.

Naturally, the Mexes are happy to blame America first, last and always. It's traditional among Mexicans that their country refuses to take responsibility for its failings..

It has been this way since we paid a very bitter Mexico for the SW area in the United States after we won that war. They will remain bitter and in a state of denial until they over run us. Of course, that will never happen, but what's scary is that is the part that most of our leaders deny or fail understand..

This language spin conforms to the new Obama administration's Mr. Softee approach to everything that poses a threat. For example, Homeland Security Chief Napolitano proclaimed recently that "terrorism" was too harsh a term. She prefers to say "man-caused disasters." (Isn’t that sexist?) She wants to move away from the "politics of fear," you see. Likewise, the President has redubbed the "war on terror" as an "overseas contingency operation."

Do these people sound like responsible adults, capable of protecting the country?

No, they sound like a bunch of fumbling idiots running around with their political correct heads cut off. These pathetic traitiors we have as leaders are protecting the agenda of the powers that really are. They will do and say anything to protect that agenda without coming out and saying so.

This country has been without a President since the aasinationo of JFK.

Does the President really think that being Senor Nice Guy with Mexico will help on the border chaos, or is it all play-acting for his domestic Mexican base?

Obama did leave open the possibility of militarization later on, so he perhaps understands that a Mexican stampede would not be popular among voters.

Hence, the need to dilute dissenters via more amenable voter replacement.

Still, it's hard to imagine the kumbaya President launching a military campaign that would infuriate millions of Spanish-speaking constituents.

These three quotes illuminate(at least for me)the underlying rationale of this President. Might I add, could this have been any more predictable?