Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012

    WHITE HOUSE CLAIMS POWER TO REGULATE, TAX INTERNET WITHOUT CONGRESS

    WHITE HOUSE CLAIMS POWER TO REGULATE, TAX INTERNET WITHOUT CONGRESS

    by CHRISS W. STREET16 Jan 2015Newport Beach, CA

    The White House dropped a bombshell on Thursday byannouncing that FCC already has the authority to take over regulating and taxing the Internet without Congressional approval.

    Under “network neutrality” proceedings, the FCC could extend its 16.1% fee on interstate telecommunications services and relay fees to the Internet. The action would more than double the “universal service” revenue it collected in 2014, from $8 billion to $16 billion.

    Although Congress has mandated the general nature of the federal universal service fund and telecommunications relay services, it is the FCC that has the sole authority to set the budget size and the fee structure to perform its regulatory mandate.
    The FCC last year announced an ambitious multi-billion program to connect schools and libraries with Wi-Fi. Other advocates are also seeking expansion of low-income subsidies for the “Obamaphone” to include Internet access programs.

    But the FCC had not moved forward on its social agenda due to a perceived lack of congressional jurisdiction, and due to the need for a significant revenue source to defray the huge costs.

    Implementing network neutrality proceedings without addressing huge opposition from congressional conservatives and personal liberty advocates would be a game changer.

    “In terms of legislation, we don’t believe it’s necessary given that the FCC has the authorities that it needs under Title II,” a White House official told Reuters. “However, we always remain open to working with anyone who shares the president’s goal of fully preserving a free and open internet now and into the future.”

    FCC control of how Internet service providers (ISPs) manage web traffic on their networks is supposedly an effort to ensure that the ISPs treat all of the Internet’s content “fairly.” But it is the potential for political bias in interpreting what “fairly” actually means that is at the heart of the debate over the legal authority to set regulations and fees.

    President Obama urged the FCC to begin strictly regulating ISPs under a section of the communications laws known as Title II, which would treat them as public utilities. Broadband companies and venture capitalists vehemently oppose the White House plan, claiming intrusive regulatory burden would stifle innovation and tank investment.

    New Republican Chairmen of the Senate and House Commerce Committees, John Thune (SD) and Fred Upton (MI), respectively, were working toward a legislative deal with Democrats that would adopt some net neutrality principles, but without resorting to extending the Title II framework to the Internet.

    As a show of a good-faith bipartisan approach, Senator Thune released a list of the net neutrality principles he would pursue as new legislation, which closely echoed the President’s call for bans on cable ISPs and others blocking or throttling websites. But the arrogance of the Obama administration’s comments will spike the ability of moderate Democrats to cooperate with the Republicans.

    FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler, an Obama appointee, indicated no interest delaying an FCC vote scheduled for February 26 and seems determined to impose the President’s new net neutrality rules. FCC spokeswoman Kim Hart said in a prepared statement, “Chairman Wheeler believes it is important to move forward as quickly as possible to protect consumers, innovation and competition online.”

    The White House’s dismissal of any negotiations with Republicans in setting the “basic rules” governing Internet access is a slap in the face to the private sector, whose innovations created Internet demand. President Obama effort to turn the Internet into just another telephone service is demonstrating his faith in an intrusive public sector that thrives on high taxes, heavy-handed controls and the status quo.

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...hout-congress/


  2. #2
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Similar Threads

  1. White House Looks To Regulate Cow Flatulence As Part Of Climate Agenda
    By kathyet2 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-29-2014, 11:05 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-28-2014, 08:26 PM
  3. House to examine plan for United Nations to regulate the Internet
    By kathyet in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-26-2012, 11:12 AM
  4. White House Power Grab that Congress and America Doesn’t S
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-13-2010, 10:44 AM
  5. Cyber attack? The Internet power grab by the Obama White Hou
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-03-2009, 06:41 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •