Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 35
Like Tree11Likes

Thread: Why is Senator $Harry Reid$ so concerned with a local Nevada rancher?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member HAPPY2BME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    17,895

    Why is Senator $Harry Reid$ so concerned with a local Nevada rancher?

    Fox News
    Wayne Allen Root
    April 16, 2014

    Why did this assault become the #1 priority of government only days after a senior political advisor to Nevada Senator Harry Reid took over BLM? Coincidence?

    Government appeared completely uninterested in backing down for days on end… and completely unconcerned with instigating a deadly confrontation like Waco or Ruby Ridge. Then suddenly Senator Reid’s involvement was brought up by conservative web sites across the Internet. INSTANTLY, out of the blue, within hours of Reid’s name being attached to the raid, the BLM decided to back down, pack up and walk away. Don’t you think that this timing was a tad too coincidental?
    Why is US Senator Harry Reid so concerned with a local Nevada rancher?





    I live in Las Vegas. I live and breath Nevada politics. Something is very wrong. Something smells rotten in the Nevada desert. And Senator Harry Reid’s fingerprints are all over it.

    I am of course referring to the Bundy Ranch siege. This was a dispute between a Nevada ranching family with rights to the land in question for 140 years and the BLM (Bureayu of Land Management).


    The government claims they haven’t paid grazing fees for 20 years. The result was a government assault on the ranch- including snipers with assault rifles, SUV’s, helicopters, airplanes and over 200 heavily armed troops. No matter whether you come down on the side of the government or the ranch family, I think all of us can agree this was excessive force.
    Doesn’t it strike anyone as strange that the U.S. Senate Majority Leader is so obsessed with a small rancher who hasn’t paid grazing fees?

    But forget all that. I believe the more important question is, why is this case so important to United States Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid? And what was his involvement in this controversial assault?

    Let’s start with Harry Reid’s obsession with the case. Just on Monday evening he weighed in again, promising, “This isn’t over.”

    Doesn’t it strike anyone as strange that the U.S. Senate Majority Leader is so obsessed with a small rancher who hasn’t paid grazing fees? Does New York Senator Chuck Schumer get involved publicly when a New York company is late paying rent to the U.S. government?

    Doesn’t the Senate Majority Leader have anything more important to think about?
    There are almost 100 million working-age Americans no longer working. More Americans are today on entitlements than working in the private sector. More Americans are on food stamps than the number of women working in America. Iran is building a nuclear bomb. Russian jet fighters are threatening American ships. Yet Harry Reid obsesses about a rancher late on his rent? Something smells fishy folks.

    There are other questions raised about Reid’s involvement. Why did this assault become the #1 priority of government only days after a senior political advisor to Nevada Senator Harry Reid took over BLM? Coincidence?

    Government appeared completely uninterested in backing down for days on end…and completely unconcerned with instigating a deadly confrontation like Waco or Ruby Ridge. Then suddenly Senator Reid’s involvement was brought up by conservative web sites across the Internet. INSTANTLY, out of the blue, within hours of Reid’s name being attached to the raid, the BLM decided to back down, pack up and walk away. Don’t you think that this timing was a tad too coincidental?

    It has been pointed out by journalists intent on covering for Reid that a $5 billion Chinese solar project backed by Reid was recently shelved. But what they forgot to mention is Reid’s involvement in multiple solar and wind projects across the Nevada desert. Only days ago, Senator Reid was featured in a photo at a groundbreaking ceremony for a new solar project. Where is that project located? Just 35 miles from the Bundy ranch in Bunkerville, Nevada.

    Senator Reid’s fingers are in virtually every solar and wind project in the Nevada desert. Green energy is his obsession. Green energy is his baby. His vision is turning the Nevada desert into the “Green Energy Capital of America.”

    Who benefits from that vision? Democratic donors who run green energy companies. Who stands in the way of that vision- Nevada’s ranchers, farmers and property owners- almost all of whom are diehard Tea Party conservatives and patriots who despise Reid.

    Reid and the BLM needed a “cover story” to take the land away from the ranchers. So they claim it’s about protecting the “endangered” desert tortoise.

    But if the protection of the desert tortoise was so important to the BLM, why did the same BLM kill hundreds of desert tortoises last fall?


    If protecting the tortoises was so important, why has the BLM constantly waived rules protecting the desert tortoise for multiple solar and wind projects? If cattle are a danger to tortoises, why are solar panels and wind turbines not a danger?
    There’s much more to this story folks. My educated guess is that someone in the government already has big plans lined up for the Bundy Ranch. Someone is going to make a financial killing with this forceful land grab. Someone powerful in government wants the Bundy family off their land (after 140 years).

    What's good for the goose is good for the gander. It was U.S. Senator Harry Reid who famously made a guess about Mitt Romney's taxes. He guessed wrong. No one seemed to mind. So now it's time for all of us to ask questions about Senator Reid's involvement in this scandal and government land grab. It’s time for the media to investigate.

    I'm only guessing…but something smells very rotten in Nevada.

    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2014/...d=NL_morninghl
    Join our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & to secure US borders by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member HAPPY2BME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    17,895
    Why does federal government own 84% of Nevada and what can Reid do to give it back?

    April 16, 2014 by Jonathon Moseley 188 Comments

    Many say Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid could easily arrange for his home state to get back most of the 84 percent of Nevada territory owned and controlled by the federal government. So does the Democrat represent the interests of Nevada, or does he put the interests of the U.S. government and the Democratic Party over his own state’s needs?

    Nevada would get what it deserves if Reid drafted a measure to treat Nevada the same way as other states. The Republican-led U.S. House of Representatives would eagerly vote to treat Nevada like a grown-up. Instead, Reid runs the U.S. Senate with an iron fist, to the detriment of his own voters.

    Renegade rancher Cliven Bundy raised a question during the hair-raising show-down between the Bureau of Land Management and the militia supporting the cattle rancher. Bundy says he was paying grazing fees to Clark County, but that the county stopped accepting his payments. Bundy insists that Nevada, not the U.S. government, owns the land where his cattle graze.

    According to the ranchers’ argument, the federal government “owned” or controlled every territory before it became a state, but once statehood was reached, the land became the property of the new state.

    So how is it that the U.S. government owns 84 percent of Nevada? It certainly looks like Nevada citizens are being treated unfairly. It is almost as if Washington, D.C., is treating Nevada like a child that can’t manage itself.


    Photo: WND Facebook

    Many Western states were treated unequally when they joined the Union. Unlike Eastern states, Congress reserved vast amounts of federally-owned land in the “Enabling Acts” for statehood in the West. Article 4, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution requires an act of Congress to create a state. Keeping the majority of land in federal control seems in conflict with the very concept of statehood. The second paragraph of Section 4 appears to authorize this bizarre practice. But on closer inspection, that is far from clear.

    The Nevada Constitution includes an “Ordinance” section that adopts the requirements of the congressional Enabling Act. A second rewrite of the state constitution was approved by voters on Sept. 7, 1864. Nevada became the 36th state on Oct. 31, 1864. Nevada agreed to let the federal government own “unappropriated land” within the state, “unless otherwise provided by the Congress of the United States.”

    Las Vegas Review Journal reported in December:
    Some Nevadans, particularly from the rural areas of the state, have been pushing the idea of a state takeover of federal lands for years.
    Supporters were successful in the 2013 session of the Nevada Legislature in getting a measure passed to allow for a study of the concept.

    The group created by Assembly Bill 227, the Nevada Land Management Task Force, has been charged with evaluating whether the state should consider taking over control of some of the public lands now managed by federal agencies, including the Bureau of Land Management, which controls 76 percent of the land in the state.

    The task force will submit its findings to the Legislative Committee on Public Lands by Sept. 1.

    All these years later, Congress could easily right this discriminatory wrong. As the leader of the U.S. Senate, Reid could propose a change reverting the property to Nevada’s control, and Republicans in the House would enthusiastically agree.
    Nevada voters should tell the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House to end the discrimination against Nevada and release the “unappropriated territory” to the management and ownership of their own state government.

    http://www.bizpacreview.com/2014/04/...it-back-112757
    Join our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & to secure US borders by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    Another update





    Bundy Ranch: The Land and its Masters Revealed (sync fixed)



    Bundy Ranch: The Land and its Masters Revealed



    NextNewsNetwork·2,576 videos


    Published on Apr 16, 2014
    Since the Bundy Ranch story broke last week and culminated in a tense standoff with Federal agents on Saturday resulting in the release of the Bundy Ranch cattle we have been following the money. On the 10th we reported the Militia arrived in the area and cited a former BLM volunteer and Nevada Land Broker who revealed to us the true value of the land and the parties interested in it. In our on-going investigation into the money behind the Bundy Ranch Land Grab we present former BLM Volunteer Rusty Hill's Records Research detailing his first hand experience in the Bunkerville area, its value to the Military Industrial complex - and most notably the corporations that bear Harry Reid's own name in Bunkerville,- bordering USA lands and the Bundy Ranch.

    So why do they want this land? Water, access to land, privacy and mineral rights - notably Magnesium Dolomite with one of its military applications as solid rocket fuel found in Tomahawk cruise missiles - friends it is much more than Chinese solar power.

    In this investigation we provide the historical context to the lands around the Bundy Ranch, the mineral value of the land and it's application in weapons manufacturing.

    But here is where it get's interesting. Using the public records from Clark County we disclose irregularities and anomalies in the public record of the sale prices of land surrounding the Bundy Ranch owned by the BLM, Cedar Development Corp, Zion Bank Corp, Bunkerville Compound LLC, AND Reid Bunkerville LLC who you will discover "paid nothing for the land"

    This research reveals the highly suspicious activity surrounding the Bureau of land management, Cedar Development Corp, Zion Bank Corp and Reid Bunkerville LLC.

    Due to the use of government force to remove Bundy "trespass cattle" and the lands that Reid Bunkerville LLC received at ZERO cost we can draw a line to their desire to run him off his land for their own gain - an American whose family settled that land over 100 years ago.

    It's time for a congressional investigation.

    Gary Franchi reporting for the Next News Network.

    Download your free Next News "Heroes & Villains" Poster here: http://nextnewsnetwork.com/the-2013-h...

    Donate USD: http://nnn.is/donate-dollars
    Donate BTC: http://nnn.is/donate-bitcoin

    LIVE: http://NextNewsNetwork.com
    Facebook: http://Facebook.com/NextNewsNet
    Twitter: http://Twitter.com/NextNewsNet
    Sub: http://NNN.is/the_new_media
    Meet the Next News Team: http://youtu.be/2QnNKwQ2WkY
    Hashtag: #N3

    Military Footage Courtesy:
    MiitaryNotes YouTube Channel:
    https://www.youtube.com/user/Military...
    Video by Spc. Neil Stanfield. 03.27.2011
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmhuQ...

    Research mapping footage courtesy Google Earth
    Records Courtesy: Clark County Records
    Research by Russell Hill
    Studio Camera: Devin Hansen
    Producer Reporting: Gary Franchi


    Last edited by kathyet2; 04-18-2014 at 09:35 AM.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    Indicted Businessman Names Harry Reid as Alleged Recipient of Massive Bribe

    Posted on 17 April, 2014 by AmyElizabeth

    A Utah businessman is rocking both state and national politics after claiming Utah Attorney General John Swallow helped him broker a deal with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to make a federal investigation into his company quietly disappear, the Salt Lake Tribune reports.

    Jeremy Johnson was allegedly told that the price would be $600,000, and claims to have made an initial payment of $250,000 when he was slapped with a federal lawsuit. Now he says he wants his money back.
    The Salt Lake Tribune points out that Johnson has no way of knowing whether the funds actually made it to Reid, even if he did make a massive payment to Reid’s alleged intermediary.
    The Salt Lake Tribune continues, explaining how the bribe supposedly came to be in 2010:
    At the time, Johnson was largely known in Utah as a wealthy philanthropist who spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to ferry supplies into Haiti after the devastating 2010 earthquake.
    Then, with the FTC investigation continuing, Johnson said Swallow suggested Reid could make problems with regulators go away — for a price.
    “I said, ‘OK, what do I need to do?’ He’s like, ‘OK, it costs money,’ ” Johnson said, who claimed Swallow was adamant he make a deal.
    “I think he told me, ‘Richard Rawle has a connection with Harry Reid,’ ” Johnson said.
    He said Swallow at first wanted $2 million to enlist Reid’s help. But [his company] I Works was no longer profitable and he did not have the money, Johnson said, so they eventually agreed on $300,000 upfront and $300,000 later.
    Swallow put Johnson in contact with Rawle, whose company has operations in Nevada…
    Rawle, who died of cancer last month, had contributed to Reid’s 2010 re-election bid and later bragged to Johnson that the Nevada Democrat helped him delay new federal payday-loan regulations, Johnson said.
    “Richard [Rawle] is traveling to LV tomorrow and will be able to contact this person, who he has a very good relationship with. He needs a brief narrative of what is going on and what you want to happen. I don’t know the cost, but it probably won’t be cheap.”
    On Oct. 7, Johnson emailed Rawle, insisting there was “rock solid proof” the FTC allegations against I Works were false. “We will do whatever it take[s] to get Senator Reid on our side and hopefully you can help make it happen. Let me know.”
    Johnson spent 96 days in jail and has released a number of emails and statements seemingly corroborating parts of his story. However, Swallow insists that Johnson is making “false and defamatory accusations” and that any role he may have played was merely for lobbying purposes.
    “There’s nothing wrong with that,” Swallow stated. “As long as I’m not interfering with a government agency as a government official, there’s nothing wrong with me being involved.”
    But Johnson told a judge he’s felt guilty about the situation from the start: “The truth is the worst thing I think I’ve done was I paid money knowing it was going to influence Harry Reid…So I’ve felt all along that I’ve committed bribery of some sort there.”
    Though the connection to Reid remains unverified, some are remembering how Reid claimed on the Senate floor that Mitt Romney hadn’t paid his taxes for ten years based on far less evidence.
    A Las Vegas Review-Journal blog jokes about how Reid might address the situation, if looking in from the outside:
    I have a “source” that says that Harry Reid takes bribes all the time. In fact, if you want anything done out of his office, you must come with a suitcase of cash just to get an audience. That’s how he’s gotten so rich on a senator’s salary. He stashes his money in an offshore bank account. And, as a sidebar for Salt Lake church execs, he hasn’t tithed on that bribe money.
    Senator Harry Reid’s office has declined to comment.



    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013...n=ShareButtons


    It's about money it is always about the money!!!!!
    Last edited by kathyet2; 04-18-2014 at 09:42 AM.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    Charles Koch Leads Harry Reid in Potential 2016 Matchup

    BY: Andrew Stiles // April 17, 2014 1:51 pm

    Harry Reid (millionaire) and Charles Koch (billionaire)



    Iowa voters would back libertarian philanthropist Charles Koch by a hefty margin over Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.) in a hypothetical 2016 presidential race, according to a new Washington Free Beacon poll:


    The results are in keeping with earlier polls showing that Charles and his brother David Koch are more popular than Reid, despite the majority leader’s breathless campaign to portray the libertarian philanthropy barons as “un-American” and “against everything that’s good for America.” Voters may have tired of Reid’s deranged bluster about the Koch brothers trying to “buy our democracy” while his Super PAC raises money from a handful of liberal billionaires.
    Voters in 2016 may not get the Koch-Reid presidential matchup many are hoping for, but it is reassuring to know that Iowans would prefer the successful businessman who has created tens of thousands of jobs, donated hundreds of millions of dollars to charity, and dedicated his life to preserving the principles of economic freedom in this country, over the multi-millionaire whose first election to political office predates the moon landing.

    http://freebeacon.com/blog/charles-k...-2016-matchup/

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    Stockman: Obama's Actions at Bundy Ranch Illegal




    NextNewsNetwork·2,598 videos


    Published on Apr 18, 2014
    After Reid declared Bundy supporters as Domestic Terrorists, Congressman Steve Stockman of Texas is now accusing President Obama of illegal actions in the wake of the standoff at the Bundy Ranch.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546

    SPECIAL REPORT-White House: Your Confrontational Children Could Be "Terrorists"

    TheAlexJonesChannel·15,877 videos







    Published on Apr 18, 2014
    David Knight hosting the Alex Jones show presents Alex's special report concerning the growing police state in America and how its reaching a tipping point.
    http://www.infowars.com/federal-judge...
    http://www.infowars.com/white-house-c...
    Follow Alex on TWITTER - https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones
    Infowars on G+ - https://plus.google.com/+infowars/
    Like Alex on FACEBOOK - https://www.facebook.com/AlexanderEme...

    :Web:
    http://www.infowars.com/
    http://www.prisonplanet.com/
    http://www.infowars.net/

    :Subscribe for exclusive reports from the Infowars Nightly News:
    http://www.prisonplanet.tv
    http://www.InfowarsNews.com


    Visit http://www.InfowarsLife.com to get the products Alex Jones and his family trust, while supporting the growth of our expanding media operation.



    Control over you and yours from the cradle to the grave.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    Witness To The Stand-Off




    TheAlexJonesChannel·15,877 videos







    Published on Apr 18, 2014
    David Knight takes the studio helm during the Alex Jones show this April 18, 2014. He begins the show by recalling in detail what it was like in the moments before and during the now legendary Bundy Ranch stand-off. Knight discusses how it was the BLM who were the violent aggressors and not the activists who risked their lives to uphold our American values and freedom.
    http://www.infowars.com/federal-judge...
    http://www.infowars.com/harry-reid-ca...

  9. #9
    Senior Member HAPPY2BME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    17,895


    Harry Reid DOUBLES DOWN, claims Bundy doesn’t pay taxes and calls supporters “domestic violent terrorist wannabes”

    Posted on Apr 18
    By The Right Scoop


    Earlier today Harry Reid was asked to explain why he called the supporters of Cliven Bundy domestic terrorists. He said the following:

    Bundy doesn’t believe that the American government is valid, he believes that the United States is a foreign government.
    He doesn’t pay his taxes. He doesn’t follow the law. He doesn’t pay his fees.
    And if anyone thinks by any figment of their imagination what happened up there last week was just people rallying to somebody that was oppressed — 600 people came in, armed. They had practiced, they had maneuvered, they knew what they were doing. They set up snipers in strategic locations with sniper rifles. They had assault weapons. They had automatic weapons. And they boasted about the fact that they put women in children — in fact one retired sheriff from Arizona boasted that he put women and children so that they would get hit first.
    So, 600 people. If there were ever an example of people who were domestic, violent terrorist wannabes, these are the guys. And I think that we should call it that way.
    Last edited by HAPPY2BME; 04-18-2014 at 06:29 PM.
    Join our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & to secure US borders by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  10. #10
    Senior Member HAPPY2BME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    17,895
    Fund: Reid Calling Bundy Supporters ‘Domestic Terrorists’ Part of Dems’ Effort to Rally the Base

    By NRO Staff
    April 19, 2014 7:34 PM



    http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...rally-base-nro
    Join our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & to secure US borders by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •