Thread: WorldNetDaily-Backed Super PAC Gave No Money to Candidates

WorldNetDaily-Backed Super PAC Gave No Money to Candidates

Posted: 01/30/2015 11:02 am EST Updated: 01/30/2015 12:59 pm EST

In an email sent in March 2014 to WorldNetDaily's mailing list, WND editor Joseph Farah did his best to talk up the new super PAC he became involved with, Takeover Super PAC.

Farah and his employee, birther extraordinaire Jerome Corsi, are on the advisory board for the super PAC, which claims a mission to "challenge America's new political establishment and party bosses to restore limited government as described in the U.S. Constitution." Farah gushed:

A new organization, Takeover Super PAC, has been created by a group of people I trust. They're shrewd and solidly-conservative patriots. I believe Takeover Super PAC will launch the next, and LAST, American revolution.

They will challenge America's new political establishment and party bosses to restore our Constitution.

Remember how we overpowered Obama and his comrades in 2010? The Tea Party proved we ARE the majority. Now it's time to make our voices heard once again!

I'm putting everything behind Takeover Super PAC.

If you're like me, you're tired of supporting people and organizations who bargain away our rights. We elect alleged conservatives who go to Washington D.C. and become turncoats. Over and over again, we win elections but lose our country.

It's time to stop pretending we can win by losing. Takeover Super PAC won't let you down. I trust this PAC 100%.

Of course, Farah also put everything behind his birther obsession, and as a result nobody believes WND. Pretty soon his "everything" won't mean much.

And it wouldn't be a Farah project if he wasn't asking people for money (which tells us that he is not, in fact, putting everything behind his super PAC), and Farah's email linked to a donation page, asking, "Will you draw a line in the sand with me NOW and donate $3 to Takeover Super PAC?"

Like a lot of things Farah says, his email turned out to contain numerous false claims.

According to the Center for Responsive Politics' Open Secrets website, Farah put virtually nothing behind the Takeover Super PAC. Of the $56,181 the super PAC has reported raising, $30,000 of it -- more than half -- came not from Farah but from WND itself. The super PAC received only two other donations of more than $200, none of which came from Farah.

As the 2014 election drew even closer, the super PAC's fundraising abilities deteriorated even further. A post-election report Takeover Super PAC filed with the Federal Election Commission covering activity in October and November 2014 states that it received only $1,588 in additional donations.

Despite Farah's claim that the Takeover Super PAC was designed to "topple the establishment," not only did it do nothing of the sort, but it didn't even attempt to do so.

According to Open Secrets, the super PAC donated no money to candidates, nor did it engage in any independent expenditures for or against a candidate or a party. Nearly all of its spending went toward administrative expenses.

The super PAC's top expense, $12,895, went to a company called Sullivan & Associates. An identical amount was spent on "Accountants, compliance & legal services," so one may assume that's where the money went. The second-largest expense, $11,796 -- a quarter of the money raised -- was paid to Tom Freiling, a longtime right-wing activist who serves as the executive director and treasurer of the super PAC.

The super PAC's post-election FEC filing confirms that it spent no money toward candidates or elections; it spent an additional $398 on operating expenditures and paid an additional $150 to Freiling.

Curiously, the FEC statement portrays WND's contributions to the super PAC as interest-free, unsecured loans. While $10,000 of that was due to be paid back to WND at the end of 2014, the remaining $20,000 has a due date of December 2025.

According to the FEC filing, Takeover Super PAC had just over $10,000 on hand as of the end of November. Is that money earmarked to be returned to WND for that apparent loan?

ConWebWatch contacted Farah for comment on the super PAC, but he did not respond.

Freiling's performance with the Takeover Super PAC seems to put him in the category of activists who are more interested in using super PACs to feather their own nests than in providing any genuine aid to the conservative causes they claim to support. Politico has reported on the prevalence of such "scam PACs" on the right.

Sounds about right. Ot sure looks like the donors to Takeover Super PAC were scammed, because they got nothing for the money they donated. Except, of course, for Freiling, who paid a fifth of the donations to himself, and for WND, which appears to have a claim on any future donations.

An extended version of this post is available at ConWebWatch.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/terry-...b_6579814.html

What are Super PACs?

A Super PAC is an organization that can raise unlimited amounts of money for spending on federal elections.

While candidates and regular PACs (political action committees) are only permitted to raise a few thousand dollars from any one individual, a Super PAC can accept unlimited contributions from any US citizen or corporation.

There’s a hitch, though: Super PACs can’t give any money directly to political candidates or coordinate with campaigns. Instead, they spend heavily on their own independently-produced ads promoting their preferred candidates, which is why the official term for a Super PAC is an "independent-expenditure only committee." Super PACs must disclose all of their funders to the Federal Election Commission. They spend most of their money on advertisements — usually television ones.

Prominent Super PACs from the 2012 election include Restore Our Future (pro-Romney), Priorities USA (pro-Obama), American Crossroads (a group identified with Karl Rove, supporting Republicans), and Majority PAC (supporting Democratic Senate candidates).

http://www.vox.com/cards/super-pacs-...are-super-pacs