Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
Joined: Aug 17, 2007 Posts: 4443 Location: Indiana, formerly of Northern Cal
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:23 pm Post subject:
I fear no action will be taken. Everything is closed Monday and the inauguration is tuesday. Once this takes place, no amount of evidence will make any difference. Our government has failed us in one of its most primary duties. _________________ Proud American and wife of a wonderful <strong>LEGAL</strong> immigrant from Ireland.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing." -Edmund Burke (1729-1797)
Officials at Occidental College in Los Angeles, Calif., have been served with a demand to produce records concerning Barack Obama's attendance there during the 1980s because they could document whether he was attending as a foreign national – in one of three fronts now established by those contesting the president-elect's constitutional eligibility for the Oval Office.
Also in that same article is something I mentioned earlier today on another forum:
The lawsuit on which USJF is working was filed on behalf of presidential candidate Alan Keyes and others, and describes the potential damage an ineligible president could create.
“Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void,” argues a case brought on behalf of Ambassador Alan Keyes, also a presidential candidate. “Americans will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal.”
Joined: Aug 17, 2007 Posts: 4443 Location: Indiana, formerly of Northern Cal
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:36 am Post subject:
I no longer care about the outcome of these challenges, only that they are heard and proof is given. IF Obama is indeed a natural born citizen, so be it. If not, he has no right to the white house. IF he is not a citizen at all, we will need to revisit EVERYTHING HE EVER VOTED ON, BOTH IN THE SENATE AND IN THE ILLINOIS GOVERNMENT to see if his vote changed the outcome. On items that it did, the sticky mess of failure to vent will be undoing the harm.
Unfortunately, if he is not a citizen at all, and he is found to be an illegal immigrant, deportation is NOT an option. We will have to support him in federal prison for the rest of his life, he already has had too many top secret briefings. _________________ Proud American and wife of a wonderful <strong>LEGAL</strong> immigrant from Ireland.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing." -Edmund Burke (1729-1797)
Joined: Apr 10, 2006 Posts: 31507 Location: Texas - The Lone Star State
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:09 am Post subject:
But...but... what about all the parties and the hyped up media coverage for the inauguration? What a disapointment it will be to all the Hollywood party goers if the inauguration doesn't get ramed through.
The only other recourse is impeachment and I don't believe this congress of Liberals will do it. Besides that, who doesn't like a puppet that you can tell to dance or else? Obama is entering office with strings attatched.
Dixie _________________ Englishmen, who have no right in this kingdom of France, the King of Heaven sends you word and warning...depart into your own country... Joan of Arc.
Joined: Nov 29, 2008 Posts: 624 Location: Portland, ME
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:12 am Post subject:
Regarding impeachment, it may not be necessary. Only people in office can be impeached. If he's an imposer and a usurper, he never gets the title passed along to him, so he's really not in office.
Joined: Aug 17, 2007 Posts: 4443 Location: Indiana, formerly of Northern Cal
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:25 am Post subject:
I think if the truth came out, too many powerful heads would roll, so even those not initially involved are all closing ranks to see that the truth is never known. Cheney, a Republican "forgetting?" to call for objections, the chief justice and his private chat ect No the truth will not be known until we are all dead and gone _________________ Proud American and wife of a wonderful <strong>LEGAL</strong> immigrant from Ireland.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing." -Edmund Burke (1729-1797)
Joined: Apr 01, 2007 Posts: 660 Location: Sturgis S Dakota
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:36 am Post subject:
That is why Col. Hollisters lawsuit MUST be heard and ADDRESSED!
The President is the Commander in Chief of ALL our Military, for Gods Sake, HE HOLDS THE MISSLE CODES!
Personally, I can not remember a United States President with so many ALIAS NAMES!!!
Barry Dunham ? Barry Soetoro ? Barry Obama ? Barack Obama ?
(MOD EDIT), LET THEIR BE JUSTICE! _________________
MY eyes HAVE seen the GLORY... And that GLORY BELONGS to US... We the PEOPLE!
Joined: Nov 29, 2008 Posts: 624 Location: Portland, ME
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 12:21 pm Post subject:
cayla99 wrote:
I think if the truth came out, too many powerful heads would roll, so even those not initially involved are all closing ranks to see that the truth is never known. Cheney, a Republican "forgetting?" to call for objections, the chief justice and his private chat ect No the truth will not be known until we are all dead and gone
It appears there has been one huge cover-up going on, and yes, they will circle the wagons to protect their own misdeeds.
But they all need to get fired (MOD EDIT). We elect them to do a job for us - not themselves.
Joined: Nov 29, 2008 Posts: 624 Location: Portland, ME
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 12:24 pm Post subject:
[quote="PatriotofPast"]That is why Col. Hollisters lawsuit MUST be heard and ADDRESSED!
The President is the Commander in Chief of ALL our Military, for Gods Sake, HE HOLDS THE MISSLE CODES!
Personally, I can not remember a United States President with so many ALIAS NAMES!!!
Barry Dunham ? Barry Soetoro ? Barry Obama ? Barack Obama ?
{Mod Edit}
, there are other alternatives. You might look at The Committees of Safety (http://www.committeesofsafety.org/) a solution promoted by Edwin Vieira and very workable. Just takes people to make it happen.
It's kind of interesting how the Democratic majority and Obama did a flip-flop on the Roland Burris controversy. First they weren't going to seat him because he was "tainted" by the process that named him (translation: Blago is a crooked shake-down artist) and then they reverse course and decide they will seat him. According to Rahm Emanual on today's Meet the Press, it was all about the Illinois Secretary of State reversing course and signing the paperwork. (Insert pause, to smile up sleeve, as we pretend "as if" the Illinois SOS wasn't taking instructions from higher up.)
But consider this ... coming from Roland Burris whose only NECESSARY qualification for U.S. Senate is that he be a CITIZEN of requisite age and period of residency ...
GONZALEZ, SAGGIO, HARLAN
VIA FACSIMILE (217) 557-7599
Barbara Flynn Currie
Chairperson
Speciaí Investigative Committee
Illinois House of Representative
300 State Capitol Building
Springfield, IL 62706
January 5, 2009
Re:Senator Roland Burris' Subpoena before the Special Investigative Committee.
Dear Chairperson Currie:
As you have discussed with Timothy Wright, Senator Burris has sworn the attached Affidavit reciting the events leading up to his appointment as United States Senator by Governor Blagojevich.
The Affidavit is not intended to be a substitute for testimony before your Committee, but may be useful to you pending the Senator's actual appearance.
Thank you for the consideration the Committee has extended to Senator Burris.
Very truly yours,
Emmitt C. House
An Attorney for Senator Roland W. Burris
GONZALEZ,SAGGIO AND HARLAN, L.L.C.
Attorneys at Law
35 East Wacker Drive
Suite 500
Chicago. IL 60601
(312)236-0175
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2
01-O5-09;03:20PI
STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY OF COOK
AFFIDAVIT OF ROLAND W. BURRIS
I, ROLAND W. BURRIS, being first sworn on oath, depose and state that the following is true to the best of my knowledge and recollection:
1. I am the Senator-Designate for the State of Illinois.
2. I am a resident of the State of Illinois, at least 30 years of age and a natural-bom citizen of the United States of America.
3. On Friday, December 26, 2008, I received a telephone call from Sam Adams, Jr., ("Mr. Adams, Jr.") an attorney employed by Rod Blagojevich, the Governor of the State of Illinois ("Governor Blagojevich").
4. During the December 26, 2008 telephone conversation with Mr. Adams, Jr., he asked if he couid come to my residence to discuss a matter with me.
5. At my residence Mr. Adams Jr. asked if l had an interest in accepting Governor Blagojevioh's appointment to fill the Senate seat left vacant by President-Elect Barack Obama. I responded to Mr. Adams, Jr. that I needed a couple of days to confer with friends and family and that I would inform him of my decision within a couple of days.
6. On Sunday, December 28,2008, Mr. Adams Jr. contacted me by telephone and then visited me at my home to ask me if I had reached a decision with respect to accepting or rejecting Governor Blagojevioh's appointment to the United States Senate.
7. I told Mr. Adams Jr. that, should Governor Blagojevich offer the appointment to the United States Senate, I would accept.
8. On Sunday, December 28, 2008, at approximately 4:00 p.m., Governor Blagojevich personally contacted me by telephone, praised my public service record and offered to appoint me to the United States Senate to fill the Senate seat left vacant by President-Elect Barack Obama.
9. During the December 28, 2008 telephone conversation with Governor Blagojevich, I formally accepted the appointment to the United States Senate. Governor Blagojevich then indicated that he would formally announce my appointment at a press conference within the next couple of days. The telephone call then ended.
10. Other than greetings, Governor Blagojevich praising my public service record, his offer and my acceptance of the appointment to the United StatesSenate, and the discussion of the future press conference to announce my appointment, Governor Blagojevich and I discussed no other topics or subject matter during the December 28, 2008 telephone conversation.
11. Prior to the December 26, 2008 telephone call from Mr. Adams, Jr., there was not any contact between myself or any of my representatives with Governor Blagojevich or any of his representatives regarding my appointment to the United States Senate.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT.
ROLAND W. BURRIS
Senate-Designate for the State of Illinois
Subscribed and sworn to me this___ day of January, 2009
OFFICIAL SEAL
DARYL TOM
Notary Public -State of Illinois
My Commisslnn Expiras Jun 18, 2012
Mr. Burris was once the state Attorney General for Illinois, and he held some other positions in state government. One has to wonder if there is a birth certificate hanging out in Illinois files somewhere which he has seen. After all, Obama would have applied for a driver's license, and possibly through a local county office for a passport (remember, he took Michelle to Kenya to visit his relatives in the early 1990's either before they got married in 1992 or shortly after).
When someone uses a pointed reference to "natural born" in an affidavit, and for an office which doesn't require that the office-holder even be "natural born", you have to think that the long trail of actions potentially taken under threat of "blackmail" (picking Biden of Senate Intelligence Committee fame as running mate, Clintonista appointments up to the rafters) just got a little longer.
Joined: Aug 17, 2007 Posts: 4443 Location: Indiana, formerly of Northern Cal
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 1:16 pm Post subject:
Freedomfirst,
I will bet my kids college funds that this is just the tip of the iceberg. _________________ Proud American and wife of a wonderful <strong>LEGAL</strong> immigrant from Ireland.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing." -Edmund Burke (1729-1797)
Joined: May 16, 2006 Posts: 1941 Location: Getyourassoutahere, Texas
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 9:35 pm Post subject:
Has anyone noticed that the date for review the case of Obamas's eligibility keeps getting pushed out? Now it's 23 Jan? I am convinced now that we are only seeing "the tip of the iceberg". Elected government officials, one after another, covering up for each other on a grand scale. Can we afford the luxury of sitting idly by and watching this charade, purporting to be our government of "we the people", unfold in front of us like a bad dream? _________________ ...I call on you in the name of Liberty, of patriotism & everything dear to the American character, to come to our aid...
William Barret Travis
Letter From The Alamo Feb 24, 1836
Joined: Nov 29, 2008 Posts: 624 Location: Portland, ME
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:35 pm Post subject:
TexasBorn wrote:
Has anyone noticed that the date for review the case of Obamas's eligibility keeps getting pushed out? Now it's 23 Jan? I am convinced now that we are only seeing "the tip of the iceberg". Elected government officials, one after another, covering up for each other on a grand scale. Can we afford the luxury of sitting idly by and watching this charade, purporting to be our government of "we the people", unfold in front of us like a bad dream?
We can't afford to sit by. We need to take back our country, state by state.
Please look at The Committees of Safety (http://www.committeesofsafety.org/) a solution promoted by Edwin Vieira and very workable.
Just takes people to make it happen. Get involved. Sign up today!
Joined: May 16, 2006 Posts: 1941 Location: Getyourassoutahere, Texas
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:14 pm Post subject:
Cayla, I have similar fears. Our government hasn't just failed us in one of it's most primary duties...they will have ignored and violated the law of the land, our constitution! Additionally, ask yourself, what precedent will this episode set if Obama is allowed to take the oath of office???? Will U.S. attorney's be allowed to run rough shod over our constitutional protections since our own president was allowed to?? In my opinion we are approaching some very dangerous waters for this country!
cayla99 wrote:
I fear no action will be taken. Everything is closed Monday and the inauguration is tuesday. Once this takes place, no amount of evidence will make any difference. Our government has failed us in one of its most primary duties.
_________________ ...I call on you in the name of Liberty, of patriotism & everything dear to the American character, to come to our aid...
William Barret Travis
Letter From The Alamo Feb 24, 1836
Joined: Aug 17, 2007 Posts: 4443 Location: Indiana, formerly of Northern Cal
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 8:12 pm Post subject:
I just heard on local radio about the lightfoot case before the courts on friday. One of the more than 50 co-plaintiffs is a BLOOD RELATIVE of Obama's and allegedly has pictures of the birth and newborn that another relative had given this person decades ago. They would not go into any more detail, but said that the pictures are in a sealed part of the file for the request of writ and that the court will have no doubts by Friday as to whether or not these are nonsense cases. What they decide to do about the writ we won't know until Friday or monday. _________________ Proud American and wife of a wonderful <strong>LEGAL</strong> immigrant from Ireland.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing." -Edmund Burke (1729-1797)
Importance of Obama’s swearing-in
Written by Macharia Munene
January 20, 2008: Today, January 20th 2009, Barrack Obama takes the oath of office as the 44th president of the United States and 39 former presidents will be watching from wherever it is that people go when they die.
Many will wonder what happened, some may think it is a logical progression while others might question that logic. The inauguration is the final defeat of Tuskegee thinking. Given the nature of the deliberations in the summer of 1787 at Philadelphia, they might wish they had included a “grandfather clause.”
In closed meetings, 55 elite white men had haggled about the structure of government that would be strong enough to protect their general interests while leaving the locals to worry about routine and peculiar issues.
Among the peculiarities was slavery and the issue was how to reconcile slavery with liberty under one roof. For the purposes of taxes and possible representation in a state, a slave was three-fifths of a man.
Several of those brilliant men were slave owners. To avoid a populist bamboozling poor voters into electing him, they created an Electoral College of supposedly wise men who knew how to look after the interests of their states. These would therefore decide the right person even if it is against the wishes of the people.
Similarly, foreigners were kept out by requiring that a candidate be natural born American. Most likely the president would always be a white male, preferably of Protestant religious inclination.
They generally had low opinion of black people who claimed to be free and so removing “free” blacks from the United States became a preoccupation. They acquired territory in West Africa, called it Liberia, and urged blacks to go and be “free” in Africa.
Because white people were fighting in the civil war, Abe Lincoln argued, blacks should move and settle outside the United States. After his Gettysburg Address in 1863 and a bullet in 1865, Lincoln was transformed into a “saint”.
Inducing blacks to leave the United States partially explains American involvement in the Berlin Conference of 1884-85 where white powers agreed on rules of grabbing territories in Africa.
Although exporting blacks failed, they could be taught to be subservient and not aspire to be policy makers. Subsequently, Booker T. Washington in Tuskegee, Alabama, got a lot of money from “philanthropists” to teach blacks technical work, but not to engage in serious thinking.
His political clout among blacks increased when President Theodore Roosevelt invited him for tea at the White House. A believer in white supremacy, Roosevelt encouraged Britons to make East Africa “white man’s country” and to handle natives with firmness.
He wanted Tuskegee type of education for Africans whom, he believed, “can never ... know enough” to be clerks let alone govern.
Roosevelt could never imagine a descendant of one of those “Africans”, with his slave descended wife, in the White House, not for ceremonial tea, but as the official residents. There is plenty of blame to go around for what went wrong.
The culprits include the NAACP for challenging official racism, civil rights activists, anti-colonial politicians in Kenya who encouraged Africans to go for American university education, and the increased access to quality education that black youth everywhere started getting. Obama the father and Obama the son were beneficiaries of the rejection of Tuskegee thinking.
There are many unhappy people who regret this development and attempted to stop the inauguration. It indicates that had some constitution drafters projected 2009, they might have inserted a “grandfather clause” like those of the post civil war south.
This would have required that presidential candidates, their parents, and all grandparents be natural born. That way, an African student would not have sired a potential president before returning to Africa.
Munene is a professor of history and international relations at USIU.
===============
Hard to know where to begin with attacking this guy's P.O.V. and revisionist history. So let's start with the American Colonization Society and the variety of motives it had in spending money to support freeing slaves and providing transport to the newly founded Liberia.
Maybe "Professor" Munene could devote some of his "research attention" to the topic of how more dominant African tribes were often the folks who rounded up weaker African tribes to sell them into slavery at the ports frequented by the European slave traffickers. Or how Christianity, the religion of the "white people" he so obviously dislikes, tended to be the "religious force" which brought slavery into disfavor. Interesting finding from this next source:
What is also seldom remembered is that many black Americans in the 19th Century owned slaves. For example, according to the United States census of 1830, in just the one town of Charleston, South Carolina, 407 black Americans owned slaves themselves.
Joined: Aug 17, 2007 Posts: 4443 Location: Indiana, formerly of Northern Cal
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:19 am Post subject:
I find it funny how Kenya claims him as one of their own. The Irish, including my hubby, consider my baby boy to be a "yank". They do not consider him to be Irish. The Irish also consider BOTH Reagan and Kennedy to be "yanks" although they are proud of them coming from the Irish line. When these two presidents are referred to in Ireland, they are called "Irish-American" with the emphasis on American, not once will you hear them say that we have an Irish president. Since both are former holding of England and have a strong English influence, When Kenya calls someone a Kenyan, I tend to believe they mean just that, this man was born in Kenya. My son holds duel citizenship, and I do not feel that he should ever be president because of it. _________________ Proud American and wife of a wonderful <strong>LEGAL</strong> immigrant from Ireland.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing." -Edmund Burke (1729-1797)
I just heard on local radio about the lightfoot case before the courts on friday. One of the more than 50 co-plaintiffs is a BLOOD RELATIVE of Obama's and allegedly has pictures of the birth and newborn that another relative had given this person decades ago. They would not go into any more detail, but said that the pictures are in a sealed part of the file for the request of writ and that the court will have no doubts by Friday as to whether or not these are nonsense cases. What they decide to do about the writ we won't know until Friday or monday.
I wonder if this is the evidence I referenced in this earlier post of mine Cayla
.As for the sealed lawsuit......I wonder if this has anything to do with the comment I read on Phil's site awhile back from his assistant. She could not mention specifics, of course, but there was something mentioned about some apparent doozie of evidence which had been obtained by someone, the implication being that when it finally comes to light, it's going to impact this thing big time.
And, if there is an obama blood relative out there, I wonder if THEY have requested his BC? Doesn't Hawaiin law say that these can be requested by a blood relative? Also isn't there some political wife or another who is alleged to be a blood relative to him?
Maybe I'm being pig-headed about this but as I stated in another topic.....I just cannot shake the feeling that....despite how everything might appear at the moment.......there is much more going on here than meets the eye and something IS going to happen.
Joined: May 16, 2006 Posts: 1941 Location: Getyourassoutahere, Texas
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:53 pm Post subject:
AZ, my wife keeps telling me to just move on and stop talking about this issue. She says that Obama has been vetted already and that he would never have been allowed this far if he indeed does have a problem with his birth status. I told her that he has NOT been vetted and THAT is the problem! In the past, the media has largely taken the mantle of vetting candidates but in this case they have given him a complete pass. Sometimes I feel that I have fallen in with conspiracy theorists but I have to say, in this case, something is Rotten in Denmark!!!
azwreath wrote:
cayla99 wrote:
I just heard on local radio about the lightfoot case before the courts on friday. One of the more than 50 co-plaintiffs is a BLOOD RELATIVE of Obama's and allegedly has pictures of the birth and newborn that another relative had given this person decades ago. They would not go into any more detail, but said that the pictures are in a sealed part of the file for the request of writ and that the court will have no doubts by Friday as to whether or not these are nonsense cases. What they decide to do about the writ we won't know until Friday or monday.
I wonder if this is the evidence I referenced in this earlier post of mine Cayla
.As for the sealed lawsuit......I wonder if this has anything to do with the comment I read on Phil's site awhile back from his assistant. She could not mention specifics, of course, but there was something mentioned about some apparent doozie of evidence which had been obtained by someone, the implication being that when it finally comes to light, it's going to impact this thing big time.
And, if there is an obama blood relative out there, I wonder if THEY have requested his BC? Doesn't Hawaiin law say that these can be requested by a blood relative? Also isn't there some political wife or another who is alleged to be a blood relative to him?
Maybe I'm being pig-headed about this but as I stated in another topic.....I just cannot shake the feeling that....despite how everything might appear at the moment.......there is much more going on here than meets the eye and something IS going to happen.
_________________ ...I call on you in the name of Liberty, of patriotism & everything dear to the American character, to come to our aid...
William Barret Travis
Letter From The Alamo Feb 24, 1836
Joined: Aug 17, 2007 Posts: 4443 Location: Indiana, formerly of Northern Cal
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 5:43 pm Post subject:
Today I saw a very dear friend of mine put on life support. I don't think, barring a miracle she will survive. There have been many signs of her illness for a long time now, but they have gone on basically being ignored. I was told just yesterday that she is not nearly as bad off as I thought, but I could not and still can not shake the feeling that the grim reaper is standing over her bed. Many people have been charged with taking care of her and seeing that she came to no harm, but they ignored her cries for help. At a little past noon today, she collapsed. Her name is the US Constitution. As time goes on, remember how wonderful she was. I will miss her dearly. _________________ Proud American and wife of a wonderful <strong>LEGAL</strong> immigrant from Ireland.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing." -Edmund Burke (1729-1797)
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:47 pm Post subject: FREEDOM!!!! NEVER GIVE UP!!!!
cayla99 wrote:
Her name is the US Constitution.
Cayla, the Lord raised up this nation from a bunch of English and other European settlers who came to the New World with little more than their faith in the Lord Jesus Christ and their guns, axes, and farm implements. Only He could have put together a document that Americans have seen to be all but divinely inspired in its power, efficacy, and scope. The U.S. Constitution covers eventualities that no man could have foreseen 222 years ago, and when it is not thwarted, it works. Its enemies have tried to turn it into "a living document," and failing that, they try to "kill its original intent," and that will fail too.
I put no more faith in the Supreme Court than in the Congress or the military.
But God...
Listen to highlanderjuan, to azwreath, to FreedomFirst, to TexasBorn, to CCUSA, to those who fight for freedom and are not defeated! The devil's best weapons are apathy and discouragement. The rest of the nation does care about the Constitution; they just don't care enough to defend it. Don't listen to the whines of despair from those who have lost freedom's spirit while they yet have breath!
For us who do care, it is our task to reject discouragement, to not lose heart, to take courage, to keep the faith, and to keep on keeping on. We are on the side of the truth and the right. We are the soldiers of law and order and justice. We are beacons of light dispelling the darkness of the "Fairness" doctrine, gag orders, and political correctness.
We are protectors of our native land against illegal invaders, unlawful usurpers, and forbidden foreign influence. Even if those enemies were to defeat us, which they will not, they are not able to defeat the light and the truth and the right, law and order and justice. Those are principles which outlive all their human foes. Those mere mortals know they have assaulted an impregnable defender, because there is no way they can overcome light and truth and justice.
Those forces of futility know they cannot overwhelm us directly: nearly all Americans want the Constitution upheld. So these "futile fighters" come at us freedom fighters with wet blankets for weapons, with disinformation for doctrine, with legal technicalities to thwart the authoritative U.S. Constitution, with huff and puff and bluff to intimidate those who stand upon that Constitution, to scare law-abiding citizens into following mob rule into the abyss. But we do not, we will not, we can not forsake the rule of law to follow the misguided into anarchy!
"Never! Never! Never give up!" My apologies to Sir Winston Churchill.
Jesus said, "at all times they ought to pray and not to lose heart..."
Never doubt that you are doing good by defending and upholding the U.S. Constitution.
"And let us not grow weary while doing good, for in due season we shall reap if we do not lose heart." - Gal 6:9 _________________ One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow we may wake up as illegals.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum