Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
1. No ALIPAC is not BOYCOTTING the 9/12 events in DC. Just because we decide not to throw a Rally Against Amnesty event near the date in DC, at an approximate expense to us of $10,000, does not mean we are boycotting the events. We support the 9/12 individuals and groups that are against illegal immigration and any form of amnesty, including Bush's Guest Worker Amnesty and Obama's Comprehensive Immigration Reform Amnesty like ALIPAC is.
2. We did not say we were not going to DC because there are pro-amnesty groups involved with 9/12. We said we were not going to do a rally because of a "host of reasons". Since the false claim is being made that we are not going because of the Open Borders groups and leaders, we will tell you a few of the "host of reasons" are costs, lack of time to prepare, permits, logistics, etc....
3. We did not slight Glenn Beck in our e-mail. We support Glenn Beck and have supported Glenn Beck for years. We have spoken out publicly in support of Glenn Beck and Lou Dobbs for years and have recently been fighting against those trying to get Lou and Glenn fired. We regret that some people have chosen to interpret our notice about the pro-Amnesty groups as a offense offered to Glenn Beck.
4. Partisanship? ALIPAC is going to present our supporters with the facts without regard to partisan issues. When Democrats like Obama, Reid, and Pelosi are on the wrong side of the immigration debate then ALIPAC will point that out. When Republicans like George Bush, Lindsey Graham, and John McCain are on the wrong side of the immigration debate, ALIPAC will point that out. If anyone is trying to make the suggestion that ALIPAC should temper our responses based on partisan concerns, save your breath.
5. We will provide you with more information about the positions of the groups and leaders that are conducting and sponsoring the 9/12 events soon. We did not provide that information in today's email because 1. There's lots of information to compile and research to complete and 2. The details of the pro-amnesty groups and leaders involved with 9/12 and Tax Day Tea Party events deserves its own e-mail and focus of attention when ready.
We are not boycotting, we are not telling people not to go to DC, we are not bashing Glenn Beck, we are not bashing 9/12 or Tax Day Tea Party supporters, we are not bashing all groups and leaders involved with these things.
You have some real pro-Amnesty Open Borders types that are involved and those of us who are against Amnesty and for secure borders need to know who is who among the wolves in Washington, DC.
The Open Borders Lobby is a bipartisan group of Global corporations, Democrats, Republicans, non profits, think tanks, etc....
Illegal immigration, Amnesty for illegals, and the Open Borders plans are the biggest threat to the United States. Excessive taxation, loss of freedoms, attacks on free speech, and attack on all constitutional rights are part of the plan to bring American citizens and laws into "harmonization" with Canada and Mexico and a more Global community.
The Open Borders Lobby elitists want to capture the popular uprising in this nation.
We all have to be very careful here, and there should be no tears over the fact it won't be as cut and dry as Democrat Vs. Republican or supporting Obama or not.
The Open Borders Lobby has proven itself successful in forcing Americans into elections all across our nation where you have to chose between an Open Borders pro-Amnesty Democrat and an Open Borders pro-Amnesty Republican.
Any and all of you going to Washington, DC this month need to know that you are stepping into their territory.
Whatever your most important issues are, be they taxation, freedoms, rights, health care, cap and trade, it won't matter anymore, if the Open Borders Lobby Democrats and Republicans turn 15 million illegal aliens into new voters, as they intend to later this year.
If that happens, your issues won't mean anything anymore because you will have been replaced with illegal aliens who have turned into voters that have been given a chunk of your nation in return for their services.
We will release our information on the pro-Amnesty people involved with the 9/12 movement soon, but if you must have a tidbit to tide you over just Google "Grover Norquist, Americans for Tax Reform, immigration."
And since we must anticipate some expected criticisms for releasing this information, let us make it clear that we are not just focusing on one person and one group. There are several other pro-AMNESTY, Open Borders Lobby, leaders and groups that are on the payrolls of foreign governments involved.
If anyone has any concerns or questions please direct them to me personally. Or, if you prefer you can post your comments, questions, feedback, or concerns beneath this thread on our website..
http://www.alipac.us/ftopicp-947226.html#947226
At your service,
William Gheen
President, Americans for Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC)
WilliamG@alipac.us www.alipac.us _________________ Vox populi vox Dei
Ad majorem Dei gloriam
Joined: Sep 18, 2005 Posts: 115 Location: Los Angeles
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:10 pm Post subject:
William, I have no doubt that you've done your homework on this, but nevertheless something seems a little strange here. I have never met anyone who opposes Obama's attempt to control our health care and various other parts of our lives who was in favor of amnesty. Of course that doesn't mean there are none, because there are exceptions to every rule, but could you do a little more elaborating on just what made you decide that going to the 9/12 event on behalf of Alipac wasn't a good idea? _________________
I'd like to know the names/groups that are Tea Party groups or 9/12 that are for open borders. _________________ "The American people are slow to wrath, but when their wrath is once kindled, it burns like a consuming flame." ~Teddy Roosevelt~
Joined: Aug 05, 2008 Posts: 12828 Location: PARADISE (San Diego)
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:21 pm Post subject:
Grover Norquist, Americans for Tax Reform: Immigration is the usa's competitive advantage. (FROM JIM ROBB) Why are Republican activists Tamar Jacoby, ...
www.alipac.us/ftopicp-931016.html - Cached - Similar
Grover Norquist, Americans for Tax Reform: Immigration is the USA's competitive advantage. Competitve advantage against what? China? India? ...
www.newenglishreview.org/blog_email.cfm/blog.../22162 - Cached - Similar
NumbersUSA - For Lower Immigration Levels
Grover Norquist, Americans for Tax Reform: Immigration is the USA's competitive advantage. (FROM JIM ROBB) Why are Republican activists Tamar Jacoby, ...
Joined: Sep 03, 2009 Posts: 4 Location: North Carolina
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:30 pm Post subject:
HI to all of you:
I don't think that regular readers of the ALI-PAC site would have much confusion over what William stated here. Most of us should realize that not all citizens groups are against illegal immigration, just because they are opposed to higher taxes doesn't make them supporters of "Legal Immigration" by a long shot. This was what he was pointing out to us readers... not everyone supports this concept. Some folks are motivated by a specific topics, like higher taxes, or Health care reform. Illegal Immigration may be a serious threat to some folks, and others support "open borders". It's not a party issue for many voters, some no issue at all. They want everyone to come to the USA! We don't need a Rocket Science degree to figure this out, do we??
I'm confused. If someone is against higher taxes, how could that not be against illegal immigration? _________________ "The American people are slow to wrath, but when their wrath is once kindled, it burns like a consuming flame." ~Teddy Roosevelt~
When I read the first email, I wonder why you needed to be invited, thinking that if you wanted to be apart of this event, you would get in on it. I am most certainly sure no one would have been "rejected".
That email did appear this group leaders are angry or upset over "not being invited".
I am disspointed that this group did not do what it needed to do to be there!
Joined: Aug 05, 2008 Posts: 12828 Location: PARADISE (San Diego)
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:44 pm Post subject: RELATED
RELATED
Today's White House Meeting on Comprehensive Immigration Reform
Release Date: August 20, 2009
For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
Contact: 202-282-8010
“Today’s meeting on comprehensive immigration reform was an important opportunity to hear from stakeholders and build on
the significant time I’ve spent on the Hill meeting with members of Congress on this critical subject. I look forward to working with
President Obama, my colleagues in Congress and representatives from law enforcement, business, labor organizations, the
interfaith community, advocacy groups and others as we work on this important issue.”
Declaraciones De La Secretaria De Seguridad Nacional Janet Napolitano Sobre La Reunión Sobre La Reforma Integral De La Inmigración
“La reunión de hoy sobre la reforma integral de la inmigración fue una oportunidad importante para escuchar a las partes
interesadas y sumar al tiempo significativo que he pasado en el Capitolio reunida con miembros del Congreso sobre este
importante tema. Anticipo con entusiasmo trabajar con el Presidente Obama, mis colegas del Congreso y los representantes
de las agencias de la ley, empresas, sindicatos, grupos religiosos, grupos que abogan por la comunidad, y otros a medida que
trabajamos sobre este importante asunto.”
Participants in Today’s Meeting:
AFL CIO, Paul Almeida
AFL CIO, Ana Avendano
AFL CIO, Arlene Baker
Agriculture Coalition for Immigration Reform, Monte Lake
American Civil Liberties Union, Chris Calabrese
America’s Voice, Frank Sharry
American Farm Bureau, Ron Gaskill
American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, T.J. Donner
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Paul Booth
American Immigration Lawyers Association, Crystal Williams
American Jewish Committee, Chelsea Hanson
American Meat Institute, J. Patrick Boyle
Arizona Latino Commission, Eve Nunez
Asian American Justice Center, Karen Narasaki
Associated General Contractors, Katherine Knott
Building and Construction Trades Department, AFL-CIO, Robert Pleasure
Casa de Maryland, Gustavo Andrade
Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Mark Franken
Cato Institute, Dan Griswold
Center for American Progress, Angela Kelley
Center for Community Change, Gabe Gonzalez
Change to Win, Anna Burger
Christians for Comprehensive Immigration Reform, Allison Johnson
Church World Service, Jen Smyers
Citigroup, Paul Thornell
Compete America, Rebecca Peters
Compete America, Bo Cooper
Esperanza USA, Mary Clark
Essential Worker Coalition, Laura Reiff
Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, Jon Adler
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society/Interfaith Immigration Coalition, Mark Hetfield
Hewlett Packard, Gina Bancroft
Immigration Equality, Julie Kruse
Immigration Policy Center, Mary Giovagnoli
Information Technology Industry Council, Dean Garfield
Intel, Ryan Triplette
Interfaith Worker Justice, Kristin Kumpf
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Terry Yellig
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, John Coli
International Chiefs of Police, Russell Laine
International Federation of Professional & Technical Engineers, Paul Shearon
International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craft workers, James Boland
Irish Apostolate, Geri Garvey
Jesuit Refugee Service, Shaina Aber
Laborers' International Union of North America, Bevin Albertani
League of United Latin American Citizens, Rosa Rosales
Legal Momentum, Lisalyn Raquel Jacobs
Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services, Leslie Velez
Major City Chiefs, Dean Keuter
McDonalds, Bo Bryant
Mennonite Central Committee, Tammy Alexander
Mexican American Legal Defense Fund, Dini Karasik
Microsoft, Bill Kamela
Migration Policy Institute, Marc Rosenblum
National Association of Asian Law Enforcement Commanders, John Lee
National Association of Evangelicals, Galen Carey
National Association of Homebuilders, Jenna Hamilton
National Association of Police Organizations, Andrea Mournighan
National Baptist Convention, Rev. L.B. West
National Council of Jewish Women, Elissa Froman
National Council of La Raza, Clarissa Martinez
National Day Laborers Network, Chris Newman
National Electrical Contractors of America, John Grau
National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, Rev. Dr. Angel Nunez
National Immigration Forum, Jeanne Butterfield
National Immigration Forum, Ali Noorani
National Immigration Law Center, Marielena Hincapie
National Korean American Service & Educational Consortium, Eun Sook Lee
National Latino Peace Officers Association, Arturo Venegas
National League of Cities, Ricardo Gambetta
National Restaurant Association, Beth Johnson
National Sheriffs Association, Ann Yom
National Urban League, Valerie Wilson
New Democratic Network, Simon Rosenberg
Oracle, Dejan Pavlovic
PICO National Network, Jared Rivera
Police Executive Research Foundation, Chuck Wexler
Police Foundation, Hubert Williams
Presbyterian Church USA, Julia Thorne
Rights Working Group, Jumana Musa
Service Employees International Union, Eliseo Medina
Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Marc Norberg
Sisters of Mercy, Regina McKillip
Society for Human Resource Management, Mike Aitken
Sojourners, Rev. Jim Wallis
South Asian American Leading Together, Deepa Iyer
Southeast Asia Resource Action Center, Helly Lee
Tech America, Jeff Lande
Tyson, Nora Venegas
U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Angelo Amador
U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, Ryan Dwyer
U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, David Ferreira
UNITE HERE, Brenda Carter
United Farm Workers, Arturo Rodriguez
United Food and Commercial Workers, Joe Hansen
University of Texas, Dr. Ray Marshall
Wal-Mart, Adam Hemphill
World Relief, Jenny Hwang
Moderators
White House Domestic Policy Council, Melody Barnes
White House Domestic Policy Council, Heather Higginbottom
White House National Economic Council, James Kvaal
White House Office of Public Engagement, Tina Tchen
White House Office of Public Engagement, Buffy Wicks
Department of Homeland Security, Marco Lopez
Department of Homeland Security, David Martin
Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas
Department of Homeland Security, John Morton
Department of Homeland Security, Esther Olavarria
Department of Justice, Juan Osuna
###
This page was last reviewed/modified on August 20, 2009.
HomeContact UsSite MapPrivacy PolicyPlug-InsImportant NoticesFOIAUSA.govGobiernoUSA.govThe White House
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Joined: Sep 03, 2009 Posts: 4 Location: North Carolina
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:49 pm Post subject:
Well maybe this isn't clear enough. Not everyone who is against higher taxes sees Illegal Immigration as part of that problem. Some folks only see a narrow view and not a comprehensive picture of a government or political situation. Many do not understand that Illegal Immigration is a big part of the negatives: rising taxes, healthcare, prison populations, drugs, crime etc and other gov't problems we have. They pigeon-hole this issue and cannot see the correlation between it and other problems.
I don't know ANYBODY I have met in the 912 movement, or any freedom/lower taxes movement that is for illegal immigration, I know business owners that need to have some sort of migrant worker system (our agriculture system) but only because nobody else will do it. But they are for a legal system of ANY sorts, most I know WANT to get illegals out, they tell me criminal illegals cause problems with legals that here, (and with illegals just trying to work).
Being for legal immigration does not imply being for illegal immigration.
I think anybody screaming freedom and lower taxes, but is for illegal immigration is sorely mistaken that they can take place.
A disproportioned amount of our taxes, Federal/State/County/Local go to illegal immigrants through a myriad of costs.
This is so easy to show, one cannot argue against this point fruitfully.
I took the first email to mean that ALIPAC wasn't going to be represented at the 912 Project. _________________ This country needs a leader and not someone that thinks he's an American Idol!
William, I have no doubt that you've done your homework on this, but nevertheless something seems a little strange here. I have never met anyone who opposes Obama's attempt to control our health care and various other parts of our lives who was in favor of amnesty. Of course that doesn't mean there are none, because there are exceptions to every rule, but could you do a little more elaborating on just what made you decide that going to the 9/12 event on behalf of Alipac wasn't a good idea?
LAPhil,
The name of the game in DC is that nobody is for AMNESTY. It's the Amnesty that is not and Amnesty game.
ALIPAC considers Amnesty anything that changes the existing laws to allow illegal aliens already in the country to become citizens and vote.
We have given you one big example with Grover Norquist. More examples will follow when our research is complete and our presentation is ready.
The people you are meeting in these movement are against Amnesty. Some of the elite DC insider groups and politicians with millions of dollars at their disposal, much of which is coming from foreign government's or foreign nationals in China and Saudi Arabia, have a DIFFERENT PLAN.
We have already listed five or six reasons we decided against this rally at this time.
W _________________ Vox populi vox Dei
Ad majorem Dei gloriam
I'm confused. If someone is against higher taxes, how could that not be against illegal immigration?
Because some people are against paying more in taxes but all for the extra profits they make replacing American workers with excessive numbers of legal and illegal immigrants that will work for a fraction of the existing market wage.
Average American citizens are against both high taxes and illegal immigration.
Those profiting from illegal immigration support it and support Amnesty.
W _________________ Vox populi vox Dei
Ad majorem Dei gloriam
When I read the first email, I wonder why you needed to be invited, thinking that if you wanted to be apart of this event, you would get in on it. I am most certainly sure no one would have been "rejected".
That email did appear this group leaders are angry or upset over "not being invited".
I am disspointed that this group did not do what it needed to do to be there!
I guess it is in the eye of the beholder. I didn't interpret that way at all. I understood it the first time just as William explained it in the second email. _________________ "The American people are slow to wrath, but when their wrath is once kindled, it burns like a consuming flame." ~Teddy Roosevelt~
Grover Norquist has always stuck his nose in conservative circles ....while pushing his open borders, pro Islam, destroy America agenda. He is a slime ball of the worst kind ....read Paul Sperry's book "infiltration"
The first letter, in my opinion, was a little abrupt. I have been with ALIPAC for a number of years, and am involved in the tea party movement since its inception on 2/27/2009, and will continue to be. I firmly support both causes, and will, of course, continue to do so.
I am no spokesman, certainly, but the tea party movement does not have one single cause under its umbrella, but, rather, many. Lately, at least in California, it has added a few local concerns. ALIPAC has one, an important one, for sure. I do know, that in my limited experience in 4 tea parties and 1 townhall meeting, immigration has not been at the forefront.
I do know that ALIPAC has interests in other areas and its hands in some, but the focus has been on immigration.
When I read:
"our cause is conspicuously absent from the 9/12 efforts even though we know Glenn Beck is against Amnesty. Or at least he was over the last few years. "
it seems somewhat bitter that there was no recognition or invite.
Personally, Glenn Beck is not a spokesman for the Tea Parties, he does not represent them and this may be one area of misplaced focus. I wouldn't want him to be a spokesman anymore than I would want FOX to be a supporter, necessarily. The movement is headless, without a recognizable leader, and perhaps that's how it should stay.
When I read, "Several of the groups that are featured in the 9/12 events are pro amnesty and are GOP groups that are responsible for the continued invasion of our nation over eight years of the Bush administration. "
it appears to diminish the movement by division, inadvertently.
When I read "We will provide you with more details about that in a few days. "
I am expecting an expose on the movement, to critique it.
In my opinion, I don't think it is the right time to launch an expose a week before 9/12, as any information distributed would only be useful for any opposition, media or otherwise, who might attempt to divide either movement further. I represent only myself when I say this.
When I read
"but it appears some of the top leadership of the 9/12 events are parts of the Open Borders Lobby which is a fusion of Democrat and Republican groups that favor unlimited or barely limited legal and illegal immigration.
I feel that the categorization between Democrat and Republican, even if merged, seems more pronounced that the issues. The partisan divide, again, rears is ugly head.
The tea party movement and ALIPAC are non-partisan, grass-roots movements. In my opinion, it doesn't matter who is Republican or Democrat or Independent or whatever. The issues are the focus.
Besides, you are now talking about a conglomeration of groups, including even the central valley farmers in California, who have teamed up with Republicans, in Sacramento, to fight for water, against environmental regulation. Unheard of.
Should anyone be "excluded" because of their beliefs in causes?
That's a slippery slope and certainly something to think about.
I don't know ANYBODY I have met in the 912 movement, or any freedom/lower taxes movement that is for illegal immigration, I know business owners that need to have some sort of migrant worker system (our agriculture system) but only because nobody else will do it. But they are for a legal system of ANY sorts, most I know WANT to get illegals out, they tell me criminal illegals cause problems with legals that here, (and with illegals just trying to work).
Being for legal immigration does not imply being for illegal immigration.
I think anybody screaming freedom and lower taxes, but is for illegal immigration is sorely mistaken that they can take place.
A disproportioned amount of our taxes, Federal/State/County/Local go to illegal immigrants through a myriad of costs.
This is so easy to show, one cannot argue against this point fruitfully.
BS. There is no job that Americans won't do. If our government would quit allowing people to receive welfare when they could be working then these jobs would be filled. _________________ "The American people are slow to wrath, but when their wrath is once kindled, it burns like a consuming flame." ~Teddy Roosevelt~
Well maybe this isn't clear enough. Not everyone who is against higher taxes sees Illegal Immigration as part of that problem. Some folks only see a narrow view and not a comprehensive picture of a government or political situation. Many do not understand that Illegal Immigration is a big part of the negatives: rising taxes, healthcare, prison populations, drugs, crime etc and other gov't problems we have. They pigeon-hole this issue and cannot see the correlation between it and other problems.
Does not compute. _________________ "The American people are slow to wrath, but when their wrath is once kindled, it burns like a consuming flame." ~Teddy Roosevelt~
Last edited by jinky on Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:23 pm; edited 1 time in total
I don't know ANYBODY I have met in the 912 movement, or any freedom/lower taxes movement that is for illegal immigration, I know business owners that need to have some sort of migrant worker system (our agriculture system) but only because nobody else will do it. But they are for a legal system of ANY sorts, most I know WANT to get illegals out, they tell me criminal illegals cause problems with legals that here, (and with illegals just trying to work).
Being for legal immigration does not imply being for illegal immigration.
I think anybody screaming freedom and lower taxes, but is for illegal immigration is sorely mistaken that they can take place.
A disproportioned amount of our taxes, Federal/State/County/Local go to illegal immigrants through a myriad of costs.
This is so easy to show, one cannot argue against this point fruitfully.
Grover "open borders" Norquist is the head of the lower taxes movement.....he is a phony and a fake while sucking in conservatives, with his low taxes message
The first letter, in my opinion, was a little abrupt. I have been with ALIPAC for a number of years, and am involved in the tea party movement since its inception on 2/27/2009, and will continue to be. I firmly support both causes, and will, of course, continue to do so.
I am no spokesman, certainly, but the tea party movement does not have one single cause under its umbrella, but, rather, many. Lately, at least in California, it has added a few local concerns. ALIPAC has one, an important one, for sure. I do know, that in my limited experience in 4 tea parties and 1 townhall meeting, immigration has not been at the forefront.
I do know that ALIPAC has interests in other areas and its hands in some, but the focus has been on immigration.
When I read:
"our cause is conspicuously absent from the 9/12 efforts even though we know Glenn Beck is against Amnesty. Or at least he was over the last few years. "
it seems somewhat bitter that there was no recognition or invite.
Personally, Glenn Beck is not a spokesman for the Tea Parties, he does not represent them and this may be one area of misplaced focus. I wouldn't want him to be a spokesman anymore than I would want FOX to be a supporter, necessarily. The movement is headless, without a recognizable leader, and perhaps that's how it should stay.
When I read, "Several of the groups that are featured in the 9/12 events are pro amnesty and are GOP groups that are responsible for the continued invasion of our nation over eight years of the Bush administration. "
it appears to diminish the movement by division, inadvertently.
When I read "We will provide you with more details about that in a few days. "
I am expecting an expose on the movement, to critique it.
In my opinion, I don't think it is the right time to launch an expose a week before 9/12, as any information distributed would only be useful for any opposition, media or otherwise, who might attempt to divide either movement further. I represent only myself when I say this.
When I read
"but it appears some of the top leadership of the 9/12 events are parts of the Open Borders Lobby which is a fusion of Democrat and Republican groups that favor unlimited or barely limited legal and illegal immigration.
I feel that the categorization between Democrat and Republican, even if merged, seems more pronounced that the issues. The partisan divide, again, rears is ugly head.
The tea party movement and ALIPAC are non-partisan, grass-roots movements. In my opinion, it doesn't matter who is Republican or Democrat or Independent or whatever. The issues are the focus.
Besides, you are now talking about a conglomeration of groups, including even the central valley farmers in California, who have teamed up with Republicans, in Sacramento, to fight for water, against environmental regulation. Unheard of.
Should anyone be "excluded" because of their beliefs in causes?
That's a slippery slope and certainly something to think about.
I did not mean for it to sound bitter.
Just factual.
Hell, I wish they had Roy Beck of Numbers or even Dan Stein from FAIR in this thing. Or how about 9/11 Families for a Secure America?
Not one single group or leader from our movement on the radar yet multiple pro amnesty Open Borders groups and leaders displayed in bright lights.
What other conclusion does this suggest? They included the OBL's but just happened to accidentally leave out their opponents from our team?
I have but one concern and that is winning this battle against illegal immigration and when I see our opponents in the leadership on something like this and our side virtually excluded I'm going to ask questions.
I've been asking those questions and we have found some things out that all you need to know and will know when it is ready for presentation.
W _________________ Vox populi vox Dei
Ad majorem Dei gloriam
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:32 pm Post subject: People Just Don't Get It
I would find it completly impossible to be part of a rally against federal taxation without mentioning that the first and foremost reason taxes are being raised is the escalating costs of illegal immigration.
Illegal immigration is not being discussed enough or hardly at all at these state-wide and nation-wide tea party rallies. Looking at the plan of events for the National Tea Party there are several Latino interests being represented.
It is amazing to me that millions of intelligent Americans don't see plain as day that illegal immigration is the number one crisis in the country. Illegal immigration and has lead up to every major problem that lies before us to include unemployment, bankrupt city, county, state and federal budgets, broke school systems, overcrowded and over budget prison systems, out of sight health care costs - and all the rest as you know.
Tea party participants deserve our respect and our support. Those of us who are against Amnesty and illegal immigration just need to work harder at enlightening half the free world about what has brought us to this breaking point in history.
Joined: Aug 05, 2008 Posts: 12828 Location: PARADISE (San Diego)
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 pm Post subject:
Lobbying career
Grover Norquist has represented various corporate interests, including American Express, and Microsoft. Records show that Microsoft paid Grover Norquist $60,000 in 1999.
I'd like to know the names/groups that are Tea Party groups or 9/12 that are for open borders.
I have been an ALIPAC member for 3 years and have not been very active with the organization for the past several months. I have devoted my time to organize the Central Ohio 912. We currently have 970 members. I have contacts with 912 groups all over the U.S. and I know of none that are for open borders. You can't be a 912er if you are!
The immigration issue is a symptom of of a larger issue, the abandoment of our constitution.
William Gheen has been a role model for the steps that I have taken so far. He advised me on PAC'S and 501(c)4's and the result was the creation of the Ohio Liberty Council which is quickly becoming the model for the TEA Party movement across the country.
It is just impossible to be a 912er or a tea party patriot and be open borders!!
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:54 pm Post subject: Re: People Just Don't Get It
mlretail wrote:
Illegal immigration is not being discussed enough or hardly at all at these state-wide and nation-wide tea party rallies. Looking at the plan of events for the National Tea Party there are several Latino interests being represented.
That could be construed as "PANDERING". That has been a big problem from the beginning. _________________ "The American people are slow to wrath, but when their wrath is once kindled, it burns like a consuming flame." ~Teddy Roosevelt~
It is just impossible to be a 912er or a tea party patriot and be open borders!!
I'm glad to hear that. I agree that illegal immigration is a symptom of what ails our country. That symptom is costing us a lot of money. _________________ "The American people are slow to wrath, but when their wrath is once kindled, it burns like a consuming flame." ~Teddy Roosevelt~
All times are GMT - 4 Hours Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Next
Page 1 of 6
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum