Welcome to Illegal Immigration: Americans Fighting Back

 Create an AccountHome | Your Account | Privacy Policy | *Contribute/Join* | Volunteer | Our Platform | Executive Members | ALI-PAC Action Panel  

Join the ALI-PAC Email Alert List

Main Menu
· Home
· Discussion Groups
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

ALI Member Login
Nickname

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Current Group Discussions

 AZ-MCSO uncovers Phoenix drop house, dozens of people found
 D.C. Paper Publishes Real Border Map
 AL-Immigrant who was shot appeals denial of victims benefits
 MI-Workers' compensation for illegal immigrants?
 ONE County Spends $600 Mil On Welfare For Illegal Immigrants
 Lawmaker: I went skinny-dipping with teen
 Immigration leaders come to W.H.
 Obamas health reform horror

Illegal Immigration: Americans Fighting Back Forums


Site Traffic
We received
186054032
page views since September 11 2004

  
Help support ALIPAC - Donate Today!

illegal immigration debate :: View topic - Immigration Stalemate
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Immigration Stalemate

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    illegal immigration debate Forum Index -> News Stories from ALIPAC Members
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
GirlGeek
ALIPAC Apprentice 2
ALIPAC Apprentice 2


Joined: May 30, 2006
Posts: 125
Location: Delaware

PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 5:55 am    Post subject: Immigration Stalemate Reply with quote

http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB115750314424954584-PBjfcOTbC4QhO7k4d72C6OpVobo_20061005.html?mod=tff_main_tff_top

Immigration Stalemate

Congress's Failure to Resolve Issue
Feeds Ire of Activists on Both Sides
By JUNE KRONHOLZ
September 6, 2006; Page A6

Riverside, N.J., passed an ordinance this summer that would bar illegal immigrants from holding a job or renting an apartment there. When Riverside's Latino community held a prayer vigil to protest the measure a few weeks later, counterdemonstrators showed up to chant "go home" and "scram."

One demonstrator waved a Confederate flag, and a few people gave Nazi salutes. "It was shameful," says the Rev. Miguel Rivera, who organized the vigil and adds that he knows who to blame: Congress.

By raising illegal immigration as a political and national-security issue -- and then doing nothing about it -- Congress has given new life to an anti-immigrant movement that had long been relegated to the political fringes, say some policy watchers and think tanks.

"The conduct of members of Congress has given it license and credibility," Rev. Rivera says. With a national election around the corner, and control of Congress at stake, "nobody from Washington wants to respond to these words being hammered against us."

Congress's failure to stem illegal immigration "may well flare up in unpleasant ways," agrees Mark Krikorian, director of the Center for Immigration Studies in Washington, which favors immigration restrictions and enforcement. But he adds that pro-immigration groups have responded with questionable behavior of their own, including the "We were here first" signs some Hispanics toted at rallies this spring, and charges of racism leveled at those who call for tougher border enforcement.

The problem was created, he and others say, when the House and Senate passed starkly different immigration bills. The Republican-proposed House bill calls for a fence along the border and makes illegal immigration a felony; it currently is a misdemeanor. The Senate bill, which attracted more support from Democrats than Republicans, would let most illegal immigrants stay in the U.S. after paying fines and back taxes, and largely reflects President Bush's calls for a law that supplies the economy with the workers it needs.

Congressional negotiators never met to iron out their differences, and final passage now seems unlikely before the November elections. Republicans are split between the party's pro-immigrant business wing and its anti-immigrant cultural conservatives. Democrats see political benefit in letting the issue simmer while they tar Republicans as anti-Hispanic for passing the House bill.

The high-profile debate has rallied immigration supporters, with many native-born Americans joining hundreds of thousands of immigrants at rallies calling to overhaul immigrant laws. But those rallies and the debate over the House and Senate bills also have focused public attention on the fast-growing illegal population and fanned fears of terrorists easily crossing U.S. borders.

The deadlock in Congress corresponds with several huge demographic trends. The U.S. is adding one million immigrants a year, a historical high. Half are illegal entrants, who tend to be poor, uneducated and Hispanic.

In the past, most immigrants settled in a half-dozen "gateway" states. But the growth in low-skilled jobs in the South and Midwest is luring them to states that aren't used to large numbers of foreigners.

That has captured the attention of state and local governments, which complain that they are carrying the health-care, education and other social costs of illegal immigration. Local leaders are "frustrated by the lack of federal action, so they're looking for things they can do," says Ann Morse, who tracks immigration for the National Conference of State Legislatures.

State legislators introduced 550 bills aimed at illegal immigration this year, Ms. Morse says, with most restricting access to driver's licenses, unemployment pay, elder care and other benefits.

City and town councils also have gotten into the act by barring day-labor centers and passing ordinances that go after employers and landlords who hire or rent to illegal residents. The Riverside measure is modeled on one that passed the Hazleton, Pa., city council and has been widely copied.

The Hazleton ordinance, which hasn't been implemented, contends that "illegal immigration leads to higher crime rates," and then bars any business caught hiring an illegal worker from obtaining city permits or contracts for at least five years.

Polls show a hardening attitude toward immigrants -- even legal ones. In three Wall Street Journal/NBC and Pew Research Center polls this spring, nearly half those asked said immigration hurts the U.S. by taking jobs, burdening public services or threatening "customs and values."

The rising passion is creating a climate that allows politicians to "rather commonly" say things that only hate groups once uttered, says Mark Potok, who monitors those groups for the Southern Poverty Law Center in Montgomery, Ala. "When politicians and other leaders speak in this way, rank-and-file people feel they've been freed to do the same and worse," he adds.


Republican Sen. George Allen of Virginia has denied he was tapping anti-immigrant sentiments last month with his "Welcome to America" remarks to a rival's campaign worker -- a second-generation Indian-American -- who was videotaping an Allen campaign event. Other lawmakers are less subtle.

Republican Rep. Steve King of Iowa regularly accuses illegal immigrants of committing sex crimes against "eight little girls" a day as part of "a slow-motion terrorist attack."

A recent Democratic Party ad juxtaposed a video clip of Hispanics scaling a border fence with images of Osama bin Laden and North Korean President Kim Jong Il -- equating illegal immigrants with terrorists, according to Hispanic groups. A Republican Party ad warns that Steve Laffey, the Cranston, R.I., mayor challenging Sen. Lincoln Chafee in the Republican Senate primary, "accept[s] Mexican ID cards" and that the cards "can threaten our security" by allowing immigrants in planes and government buildings.

The debate has energized anti-immigrant or immigration-restrictionist groups. Congress's focus on immigration has "helped create the terrain" for groups like the 18-month-old Minuteman Civil Defense Corps, which patrols the U.S.-Mexico border for illegal crossers and has raised money for a border fence, says Devin Burghart of the Center for New Community, a Chicago policy group that monitors a dozen groups aiming to restrict immigration.

But it also has prompted the governors of New Mexico and Arizona to declare states of emergency because of illegal immigration -- a move that Mr. Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies calls "political theater" aimed at showing a response to a public frustration.

Write to June Kronholz at june.kronholz@wsj.com
_________________

"When you get to the end of your rope, tie a knot and hang on." - Franklin D. Roosevelt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    illegal immigration debate Forum Index -> News Stories from ALIPAC Members All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Problems, questions, or comments? Please send Feedback to William Gheen at WilliamG@alipac.us


Paid for by Americans for Legal Immigration AMERICANS FOR LEGAL IMMIGRATION PAC
Post Office Box 30966, Raleigh, NC 27622-0966
Tel: (919) 787-6009 Toll Free: (866) 703-0864
FEC ID: C00405878

illegal Immigration Crisis in America! Americans for Legal Immigration fighting against illegal immigration
illegal, immigration, campaigns, Americans, Mexico, Legal, aliens, immigrants, gangs, ALIPAC
Fight Illegal Immigration - Americans for Legal Immigration

Looking for more information about illegal immigration? Check out...

End Illegal Immigration

Americans Against Illegal Immigration

Join ALIPAC on Twitter!

Join ALIPAC on FACEBOOK!

Join ALIPAC on MYSPACE!

Join ALIPAC on YOUTUBE!

Sitemap


Page Generation: 1.11 Seconds