Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 3:30 pm Post subject: Internet Scrub of Obama Birth Documents is Underway
Quote:
[They must be worried that Dr. Orly Taitz's case in California on Monday morning could result in discovery,
and thus expose their own false testimony and obstruction of justice at FighttheSmears.com.]
It was a little over a year ago that Atlas broke the story that Obama's certification of live birth was a "horrible forgery". I ran a 28 page forensic digital analysis meticulously prepared by a forensic digital examination specialist exposing the fraud. Obama hired five law firms to fight the release of the vault copy. It has never seen the light of day, despite numerous calls by hundreds of thousands of concerned Americans to release it.
Interestingly, in the past week, Obama's secret police have been massively scrubbing the net of any and all copies of the COLB. Even vaporizing the copies on the "wayback machine". You can see the documents he has erased here. Mighty strange. Or not.
Just last week I was reviewing them online for a piece I was researching. So this is very new.
Check out all the Atlas birth documentation coverage going back to June 10th here.
Kapi'olani Hospital Scrubs Their Website The Obama File
What a difference a day makes. Just yesterday, I posted a page (cursor down) from the Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children that featured a letter from the White House affirming the hospital as Obama's birthplace (see next item).
Well, today, the letter is gone -- scrub-a-dub-dub!
Why would they remove the letter? This is getting absurd.
Bogus POTUS 7/9/09
Massive Internet Scrub In Progress
Yesterday's item, "Fight the Smears Disappears," documented the changes that have recently been made to Obama's high-profile Internet site, "Fight the Smears," and also to the Internet Archive, also known as the "WayBackMachine.com" -- Obama has removed his bogus Certification of Live Birth from the Internet -- at the same time, the Internet Archive just happened to "lose" its archived copy.
What's really ironic is that FactCheck.org is so invested in their defense of Obama's bogus bona fides, that they just can't dig themselves out of the hole they dug themselves into. FactCheck now stands alone as a defender of the indefensible.
In the last 24 hours, further evidence of an, organized, massive scrubbing of the Internet has been discovered.
Evidence of this extraordinary campaign was posted on this site on June 18th. Sometime between June 8, 2009, and June 18, 2009, the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL) changed the requirements for identification that they maintained for over 100 years. All of a sudden, Hawaii will now accept Certifications of Live Birth (COLB) as proof of identification and residency, and will no longer require the certified "Certificates of Birth" -- although Hawaii says that they will still take the traditional birth certificates.
On June 7th, this website reported that the Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu posted on its website a letter on White House stationery dated January 24th (since scrubbed), in which Obama wrote, "As a beneficiary of the excellence of Kapi'olani Medical Center -- the place of my birth -- I am pleased to add my voice to your chorus of supporters" -- even though Obama himself has previously claimed to have been born at Queen's Medical Center in Honolulu, a claim backed up by his sister Maya.
Until June 7th, even United Press International (UPI) and Snopes.com contained statements that Obama was born at the Queen's Medical Center in Honolulu. Here is a screen capture from Snopes.com that says, "[Barack Hussein Obama was born at the Queen's Medical Center." Today, Snopes.com claims that "Barack Hussein Obama, was born on 4 August 1961 at the Kapiolani Medical Center." Snopes claims they made the change because Wikipedia made the change.
Here is the UPI screen capture that claims Obama was born at Queens -- but now the UPI claims Kapiolani. Remember, Obama, himself, told UPI that he was born at Queens.
So, because someone at the White House sent a letter to Kapiolani, all the websites that have been covering for Obama are now scrambling to scrub content that they have claimed as accurate for the last couple of years.
Over one year ago, I wrote the following for the "Biography" page:
On the Internet, there is an organized, systematic cleansing of Obama-related content.
Every couple of days I get an email telling me this link, or that link, connects to a "Page not found -- 404 error." The extensive body of Obama web-knowledge, that has evolved over the last 20 years, is shrinking. Stuff that's considered an Obama smear or unflattering is sent to the Obama '08 cyber shredding machine. And the campaign is getting help from some really big web service providers.
A good example is Kristof's famous New York Times article, in which Kristof quotes Obama saying that the Muslim call to prayer is "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth" and in which Obama recited the Muslim call to prayer, the Adhan, "with a first-class [Arabic] accent" -- that's gone -- from The New York Times -- but it's here though.
And, the Trinity UCC website has completely changed. Now, it's all sweetness and light. Gone are all those great Rev. Wright "God ... America" videos and anti-Israeli Trumpet magazine excerpts.
There's less on the web every day. In time, the entire Obama body of knowledge will consist of Obama's 3 bogus novels -- "Dreams From My Father" -- "The Audacity of Hope" -- and the latest -- "Change We Can Believe In" -- all written by Barack Hussein Obama or his "ghost-writers."
Obama has lived for almost 50 years without leaving any footprints -- none! There is no Obama documentation -- no bona fides -- no paper trail -- nothing. Just Obama's ... story.
Original, vault copy birth certificate -- Not released (lawyers' fees = $2,000,000 ~ birth certificate = $15 [$10 if you pick it up at the office])
Certification of Live Birth -- Released -- Counterfeit
and here and here
Obama/Dunham marriage license -- Not released (if one exists)
Obama/Dunham divorce -- Released (by independent investigators)
Kindergarten records -- Records lost (this is a big one -- see here -- read two frames)
Soetoro/Dunham marriage license -- Not released
Soetoro adoption records -- Not released
Fransiskus Assisi School School application -- Released (by independent investigators)
Punahou School records -- Not released
Soetoro/Dunham divorce -- Released (by independent investigators)
Selective Service Registration -- Released -- Counterfeit
Occidental College records -- Not released
Passport -- Not released and records scrubbed clean by Obama's terrorism and intelligence adviser.
Columbia College records -- Not released
Columbia thesis -- "Soviet Nuclear Disarmament" -- Not released
Harvard College records -- Not released
Harvard Law Review articles -- None
Illinois Bar Records -- Not released.
Baptism certificate -- None
Medical records -- Not released
Illinois State Senate records -- None
Illinois State Senate schedule -- Lost
Law practice client list -- Not released
University of Chicago scholarly articles -- None
And the political Left and the press, the supporters of the Usurper-in-Chief, have the gall to attack anyone that questions this EVIDENCE of a conspiracy as a kook, a nut -- as a "Birther." _________________ One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow we may wake up as illegals.
The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!
Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC on Mon Jul 13, 2009 3:49 pm; edited 1 time in total
What makes the Daily Kos image so important? It is the original from which FactCheck, FightTheSmears, Politfact, etc., derived the images they published later. The Daily Kos image has random dust specks at specific locations, for example, below the "E" in the "CERTIFICATION OF LIVE BIRTH" heading, at (x,y) = (893,185). Those random dust specks appear at the same locations on the other images, showing that they are copies of the first Daily Kos image.
________________________
Quote:
FATHER'S RACE
AFRICAN
This is an anachronism. It is out of place on a 1961 document. The term used then was "Negro", or perhaps "Colored". "African-American" was an unknown term forty or fifty years ago.
Besides, "African" is not a race; it is a native or resident of the continent of Africa. "African" includes significant populations which are Negro, Caucasian or white, Mongoloid or Mongolian, Polynesian, Hispanic, Semitic (Arab or Hebrew), Aryan or Hindu, penguins, and probably anything else except Eskimo and Native American.
________________________
Quote:
DATE FILED BY REGISTRAR
AUGUST 8,1961
The forger made a mistake and left out the space between the comma and "1961". "AUGUST 8, 1961" (note the additional space) is how this date should appear, and that is how the date does appear on other Hawaiian Certifications of Live Birth.
________________________
At the upper right of the form, the Certificate No. is redacted or blacked out. The warning at the bottom reads,
Quote:
ANY ALTERATIONS INVALIDATE THIS CERTIFICATE
This Certification is invalid or VOID; it cannot be used for any legal purposes. (Although it does seem to have been used for illegal purposes.)
________________________
Genuine Certifications are horizontally centered on the paper, with no more than 15 pixels variation. This forgery of a Certification was "printed" 75 pixels off center toward the left, more than 5 times the high side variation for the genuine article.
________________________
The printed security border is not like real security borders printed between 2006 and 2008. The forged copy is not one continuous border, but a patchwork of pieces, each 240 pixels long, cut-and-pasted together to simulate an authentic 2007 security border, so as to match the "JUN 6 - 2007" date stamp.
Dr. Ron Polarik (pseudonym) wrote:
"However, both the embossed Seal and the State Registrar’s Signature stamp do not match the same elements found on a real 2007 COLB, but perfectly match those found on a real 2008 COLB; or, in other words, something that would never happen in real life.
________________________
The Daily Kos image has dimensions, 2427 x 2369. The printed security border has dimensions, 2372 x 2312. So the image is nearly square, 97½% square, to be more exact. But the printed security border is skewed on the paper, 15 pixels higher on the right side than on the left, and 3 pixels further left at the top than at the bottom. A vertical difference of 15 pixels in the right and left sides would normally indicate a paper misfeed by the printer, normally resulting in a paper jam, or at least wrinkling of the paper.
If the border were 97½% square like the image, it would be skewed 3.077 pixels higher and 3 pixels further left, 15 pixels higher and 14 5/8 pixels further left, or anywhere between, proportionately. But it isn't. The skew is 15 and 3. Therefore, this printed image does not have right angled corners, not even in the computer program that supposedly generated it for Hawaii Vital Records. In the real world, programmers do not create trapezoidal official documents. This document is not the real world, folks. It is fantasy world.
________________________
The Hawaii Div. of Vital Records policy is to release Certifications only as laser printer hard copy. But "printed" above is in quotes because this image did not originate as a paper copy printed on a laser printer. Rather, the forger generated it, or at least manipulated it, as an image in Photoshop. Opening the image file in a text editor reveals that the image file header has the following characters of EXIF identification data:
Quote:
[Software ] = Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh
[DateTime ] = 2008: 06:12 08:42:36
In other words, the image was filed on a Macintosh computer using Adobe Photoshop CS3 software at 8:42 AM on 6/12/08, the date that Daily Kos published the computer image on their website. It is no longer the original scanner file scanned from an Hawaii Div. of Vital Records paper copy.
________________________
The Hawaii Div. of Vital Records policy also is to only release Certifications with a date stamp, the Registrar's signature stamp, and the embossed seal of the State of Hawaii Department of Health, all on the reverse side. For whatever reason, Daily Kos did not provide an image of the reverse side. I shall not presume to know why they didn't; you can draw your own conclusions.
Normally, there is bleedthrough of the date stamp; the Daily Kos image has JUN - 6 2007 from the reverse side plainly visible on the front. Sometimes, but not always, there is some slight bleedthrough of the Registrar's signature stamp; there is none on the Daily Kos image, and that is OK. Often, but not always to cursory examination, the seal embossed on the reverse side is noticable on the front; not so on the Daily Kos image.
However, under sufficient magnification and with edging enhancement to bring out the embossing, an imaging professional can show up the deformations of the anti-counterfeiting green bars in the front side background, caused by the embossing on the back. This green paper is very thin by design, and any embossing on the back inevitably causes some deformation on the front. I do not see any crimping whatsoever at 3X magnification, and that is suspicious. Even with edging enhancement, those bits of a seal that can be brought out are fuzzy and look like a blurred 3rd or 4th generation copy, not crisp like an original.
________________________
It is also Hawaii Div. of Vital Records policy to only release Certifications that are folded twice horizonally for mailing in a standard letter envelope. The Daily Kos image has a horizontal crease through the State Seal as evidence of the upper fold. There should be a horizontal crease near "MOTHER'S RACE CAUCASIAN" as evidence of a lower fold. Maybe you can find it; I couldn't. That's because it's not there, and it's not anywhere else, either.
Couldn't this copy - just this one - have left Vital Records without a second fold? Not possible, says Vital Records. Every Certification is double-folded and placed in a letter envelope. Every one. Without exception.
Unless it didn't come from Vital Records.
________________________
The image has other flaws and errors.
The seal of the State of Hawaii at the top is not a sharp original printing, but a blurry, pixelated copy from another COLB.
Text is overlaid by cut-and-paste rather than printed on the anti-counterfeiting green patterned background. The result is pattern mismatches, stray pixels, "haloes" of pixelization around the cut-and-pasted letters, and between letters, white space where the green pattern should be.
________________________
On AtlasShrugs.com , TechDude wrote:
Upon very close inspection portions of the security border also repeat every 240 pixels. By mapping this repeating pattern it becomes apparent that the pattern is laid out as a 240 x 240 pixel square that can be accurately extrapolated to the next position by simply counting 240 pixels. This type of tiling effect is commonly seen when an image has been modified by filling an area using an image editing application’s tile or pattern fill function.
. . .
The (Daily) KOS image security border pattern does not match any known specimen from any known year. It does not match the pre-2006 nor does it match the post-2006 certificate patterns. The placement of the text in all of the pre-2006 and post-2006 certificates are almost identical pixel location matches while the image's text placement does not match any known specimen from any known year. The shape and kerning of the fonts used in the 2006 through 2008 certificates are identical while the shape and kerning of the fonts used in the image does not match any known specimen. The KOS image shows clear signs of tampering such as the mismatch in RGB and error levels, visible indications of the previous location of the erased security border, easily detectable patterns of repeating flaws around the new security border, EXIF data that says the image was last saved with Photoshop CS3 for Macintosh, and finally a technician from Hawaii who confirms it just looks wrong.
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/07/atlas-exclusive.html
_________________ One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow we may wake up as illegals.
On Monday, July 13, 2009, at 3:49 PM EDT, Debra3401 posted:
Obama eligibility case will be heard on merits!!
GREAT NEWS ALERT!!
Obama eligibility case will be heard on merits !!
Please distribute everywhere.
Just got off the phone with Orly Taitz, the attorney in Keyes v. Obama.
At the hearing today at the Federal Court building in Santa Ana, [California,] [U.S. District] Judge [David O.] Carter said the following:
1. There will be a trial.
2. It will be heard on the merits.
3. Nothing will be dismissed on procedural issues. [Mr. Obama's 3 law firms have used "lack of standing to bring suit" to get 48 previous lawsuits dismissed without presentation or hearing on the merits.]
4. The trial will be expeditious, and the judge pledged to give case priority.
5. Being a former Marine he realizes the importance of having a Constitutionally qualified POTUS/CINC.
6. Judge stated that if Obama isn’t Constitutionally qualified he needs to leave the White House.
The DOJ will be involved with the case also…. I wasn’t clear if they would be trying to get to the truth or they would just be blindly representing Obama.
Orly will be adding members of the military from California as plaintiffs also. This is from my interpretation of our conversation. Orly asked me to disseminate this information out for her, she will be doing a posting later after she gets some sleep.
Please say a prayer of protection for Orly, her family, and Judge Carter.
Please also pray that the truth will come to light regarding Obama and justice will be done.
Obama eligibility case will be heard on merits !!
Please distribute everywhere.
Just got off the phone with Orly Taitz, the attorney in Keyes v. Obama.
At the hearing today at the Federal Court building in Santa Ana, Judge Carter said the following:
1. There will be a trial.
2. It will be heard on the merits.
3. Nothing will be dismissed on proceedural issues.
4. The trial will be expeditious, and the judge pledged to give case priority.
5. Being a former Marine he realizes the importance of having a Constitutionally qualified POTUS/CINC.
6. Judge stated that if Obama isn’t Constitutionally qualifed he needs to leave the White House.
The DOJ will be involved with the case also…. I wasn’t clear if they would be trying to get to the truth or they would just be blindly representing Obama.
Orly will be adding members of the military from California as plaintiffs also.This is from what my interpretation of our conversation.Orly, asked me to disseminate this information out for her, she will be doing a posting later after she gets some sleep.
Please say a prayer of protection for Orly, her family, and Judge Carter. Please also pray that the truth will come to light regarding Obama and justice will be done.
Dr Orly Taitz, Esq site here!
WOOHOO!!! _________________ The difference between an immigrant and an illegal alien is the equivalent of the difference between a burglar and a houseguest.
U.S. Army Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook, set to deploy to Afghanistan, says he shouldn’t have to go.
His reason?
Barack Obama was never eligible to be president because he wasn’t born in the United States.
Actually, Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961, two years after it became a state.
Cook’s lawyer, Orly Taitz, who has also challenged the legitimacy of Obama’s presidency in other courts, filed a request last week in federal court seeking a temporary restraining order and status as a conscientious objector for his client.
In the 20-page document — filed July 8 with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia — the California-based Taitz asks the court to consider granting his client’s request based upon Cook’s belief that Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States and is therefore ineligible to serve as commander-in-chief of the U.S. Armed Forces.
Cook further states he “would be acting in violation of international law by engaging in military actions outside the United States under this President’s command. ... simultaneously subjecting himself to possible prosecution as a war criminal by the faithful execution of these duties.”
Cook, a reservist, received the orders mobilizing him to active duty on June 9.
According to this document, which accompanies Cook’s July 8 application for a temporary restraining order, he has been ordered to report to MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, Fla., on Wednesday. From there, the Florida resident would go to Fort Benning before deploying overseas.
A hearing to discuss Cook’s requests will take place in federal court here Thursday at 9:30 a.m. _________________ Work Harder Millions on Welfare Depend on You!
Joined: May 16, 2006 Posts: 1941 Location: Getyourassoutahere, Texas
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:26 pm Post subject:
Great news! Let's keep a close eye on this! _________________ ...I call on you in the name of Liberty, of patriotism & everything dear to the American character, to come to our aid...
William Barret Travis
Letter From The Alamo Feb 24, 1836
U.S. Army Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook, set to deploy to Afghanistan, says he shouldn’t have to go.
His reason?
Barack Obama was never eligible to be president because he wasn’t born in the United States.
Actually, Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961, two years after it became a state.
You have some proof that Obama was born in Hawaii? We've all been looking for it without success. _________________ 'No arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is as formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women.'- Ronald Reagan
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:07 pm Post subject: U.S. officer demands: Is Army "corps of chattel slaves?
BORN IN THE USA?
U.S. officer demands answer: Is Army 'corps of chattel slaves?' Court challenge demands conscientious objector status unless evidence provided
Posted: July 11, 2009
12:05 am Eastern
A U.S. Army Reserve major from Florida with orders to report for deployment to Afghanistan within days has filed a court demand to be classified as a "conscientious objector" because without proof of the commander-in-chief's eligibility for office, the entire army "becomes merely a corps of chattel slaves under the illegitimate control of a private citizen."
A hearing on the questions raised by Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook, an engineer who told WND he wants to serve his country in Afghanistan, already has been scheduled for July 16 at 9:30 a.m., according to California attorney Orly Taitz, who is handling the claim.
Cook told WND he's ready, willing and able to carry out the military needs of the United States, but he raised the challenge to Barack Obama's eligibility to be president because if he would be captured by enemy forces while serving overseas under the orders of an illegitimate president, he could be considered a "war criminal."
"As an officer in the armed forces of the United States, it is [my] duty to gain clarification on any order we may believe illegal. With that said, if President Obama is found not to be a 'natural-born citizen,' he is not eligible to be commander-in-chief," he told WND only hours after the case was filed.
"[Then] any order coming out of the presidency or his chain of command is illegal. Should I deploy, I would essentially be following an illegal [order]. If I happened to be captured by the enemy in a foreign land, I would not be privy to the Geneva Convention protections," he said.
The order for the hearing in the federal court for the Middle District of Georgia from U.S. District Judge Clay D. Land said the hearing on the request for a temporary restraining order will be held Thursday.
Cook said without a legitimate president as commander-in-chief, members of the U.S. military in overseas actions could be determined to be "war criminals and subject to prosecution."
He said the vast array of information about Obama that is not available to the public confirms to him that "something is amiss."
"That and the fact the individual who is occupying the White House has not been entirely truthful with anybody," he said. "Every time anyone has made an inquiry, it has been either cast aside, it has been maligned, it has been laughed at or just dismissed summarily without further investigation.
"You know what. It would be so simple to solve. Just produce the long-form document, certificate of live birth," he said.
He said he is scheduled to report for duty one day before his hearing, on July 15, and while other details are not public, he knows he is scheduled to deploy to Afghanistan as part of President Obama's plan to increase pressure of insurgent forces there.
He told WND he is prepared for a backlash against him as a military officer, since members of the military swear to uphold and follow their orders. However, he noted that following an illegal order would be just as bad as failing to follow a legal order.
"What I want to do is deploy to Afghanistan, do my job as an Army officer, engineer. I do not want to subject myself to the possibility that I might be violating the [Uniform Code of Military Justice]," he said.
Named as defendants in the case are Col. Wanda Good, Col. Thomas Macdonald, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and Obama, described as "de facto president of the United States."
According to the court filing, Cook affirmed when he joined the military, he took the following oath: "I, Stefan Frederick Cook, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the president of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to the regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."
According to the claim, "Plaintiff submits that it is implicit though not expressly stated that an officer is and should be subject to court-martial, because he will be derelict in the performance of his duties, if he does not inquire as to the lawfulness, the legality, the legitimacy of the orders which he has received, whether those orders are specific or general."
The military courts offer no option for raising the question, so he turned to civilian courts to consider "a question of paramount constitutional and legal importance: the validity of the chain of command under a president whose election, eligibility, and constitutional status appear open to serious question."
"Others may cynically ridicule this plaintiff when, as an officer responsible not only to obey those above him but to protect those under his command, he comes to this court asking for the right to establish the legality of orders received not only for his own protection, but for the protection of all enlisted men and women who depend on HIS judgment that the orders he follows are legal. Above all, when Plaintiff Major Stefan Frederick Cook submits and contends that he files and will prosecute this lawsuit and seeks an injunction or temporary restraining order against the enforcement of potentially illegal orders for the benefit of all servicemen and women and for the benefit of all officers in all branches of the U.S. military, he knows that those in power illegitimately may seek to injure his career. He knows that he risks all and he does so in the conscientious belief that he does so for not merely his own, but the general good," according to the court filing.
"Plaintiff files this suit to clarify how he can both obey all lawful orders and avoid dereliction of his duties so as to escape court-martial under the UCMJ if he does NOT question the legality of the orders he has received. Plaintiff seeks to avoid not only court-martial in this country, but also treatment as a war-criminal or terrorist, not eligible even for protection under the Geneva Convention, if he were found to be a merely mercenary soldier in a private army of slaves, 'owned' or controlled by an unconstitutional and therefore illegal commander, if he does not ask the question: 'is this order legal?'" the case pleading states.
"Is an officer entitled to refuse orders on grounds of conscientious objection to the legitimate constitutional authority of the current de facto Commander-in-Chief?" is the question that must be answered, the case contends.
"In the alternative, is an officer entitled to a judicial stay of the enforcement of facially valid military orders where that officer can show evidence that the chain-of-command from the commander-in-chief is tainted by illegal activity?
"The issue or question raised by this suit is uniquely federal and properly (and in fact necessarily) subject to the exercise of federal power: the question whether the constitutional legitimacy of the chain of command under a constitutionally legitimate commander-in-chief pursuant to Article II, §§1-2 of the Constitution is essential to the maintenance of balance of powers and separation of powers under the Constitution, and cannot be lightly dismissed in light of the plaintiff's evidence that the de facto president of the United States is not only constitutionally unqualified, but procured his election by fraudulent and illegitimate means which may constitute a pattern of racketeering utilizing the apparatus of corrupt organizations in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1961 et seq," it alleges.
Among the officer's arguments:
* "The evidence contained in Exhibit B shows that Barack Hussein Obama might have used as many as 149 addresses and 39 social security numbers prior to assuming the office of president."
* "Exhibit C, the expert affidavit of renowned forensic document examiner Sandra Ramsey Lines, states that the certification of live birth posted by Mr. Obama as verification of his legitimacy cannot be verified as genuine and should be presumed fraudulent. "
* "Hawaiian statute 338 allows foreign born children of Hawaiian residents to obtain Hawaiian birth certificates, that those birth certificates can be obtained based on a statement of one relative only without any corroborating evidence from the hospital; that 'late birth certificates' (i.e. non-contemporaneously, post-facto, in two words 'potentially fabricated') can lawfully, under this statute, be obtained at any time later in life.
* "Barack Hussein Obama’s original birth certificate was never provided by the state of Hawaii, but only a statement that there is an original 'long birth certificate' document on file. The statement repeatedly provided by Hawaiian officials is quite simply incomplete, evasive, and without explanation of critical details: namely, whether it is a foreign birth certification or one obtained based on a statement of one relative only, or a late certification or amended one, obtained upon adoption by his stepfather."
"In other words, plaintiff asks this court to rule, declare, and adjudge, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1988(a), that an officer of the Army of the United States (all officers!) must have the right to question apparently illegitimate authority in the courts or else in the course of his employment as an officer directly within the army chain of command or in both capacities and by both manners.
"Barack Hussein Obama, in order to prove his constitutional eligibility to serve as president, basically needs only produce a single unique historical document for the Plaintiff’s inspection and authentication: namely, the 'long-form' birth certificate which will confirm whether Barack Hussein Obama was in fact born to parents who were both citizens of the United States in Honolulu, Hawaii, in or about 1961," explains the complaint.
Taitz has filed multiple legal actions around the country alleging Obama does not meet the constitutional requirements to occupy the Oval Office.
...
Now a pleading has been submitted by Thomas P. O'Brein, Leon Weidman, Roger West and David DeJute, U.S. attorneys or assistants, claiming the federal government has an interest in the claim made against Obama's actions before he took office.
The lawyers claim it is "indisputable" that the government has an interest in actions Obama took prior to his inauguration, and, therefore, the government must be served with proper notice of the action. The attorneys claim that wasn't done.
In still another case, Taitz had submitted a request to the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the U.S. military to consider military justice code complaints filed by individual members of the military challenging Obama's eligibility.
In response, J.W. Crawford III, legal counsel for the chiefs, confirmed that he had forwarded her concerns and information to the "office of General Counsel, Litigation Counsel" for further review.
Multiple questions have been raised about what that would mean to the 2008 election, to the orders and laws Obama has signed and other issues, including whether he then is a valid commander-in-chief of the military. _________________ One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow we may wake up as illegals.
A modern American Military Hero—Major Stefan Frederick Cook
July 14, 2009 · Leave a Comment
Given what he is risking to do what he sees as his Patriotic Duty, Major Stefan Cook is as courageous a hero than I for one have EVER met. He is not a sunshine soldier or summertime Patriot, as Thomas Paine once wrote (1776) in Common Sense. These ARE the times that try men’s souls.
People who do not understand what it means for an officer to weigh his career against the possibilities of committing men under him to illegal wars and combat under an illegitimate leader have never learned and will never understand the lessons of history from Nuremberg or of [Adolf] Eichmann in Jerusalem. [snip]
It is my hope and opinion that Major Stefan Cook, if he is not crushed by social and political pressure, will make a more lasting impression on U.S. military history and foreign policy than anyone else over the past 30-50 years. An ethical army can only exist if we have conscious officers in command of our armed forces. The existence of a standing army under the virtually exclusive and discretionary control of the increasingly powerful executive branch in the United States constitutes a threat (recognized by the Founding Fathers) to the balance of powers and our Federal Republican form of government.
To counterbalance the nearly absolute power of the president the people must demand and support an officer corps with legal awareness and consciousness as well as strategic, tactical, and technical competence. The modern armed forces can move so quickly in this day and age that the ability to make “in the field” and “on base” legal judgments on the part of officers has become absolutely essential in this day-and-time.
I for one am proud to be a part of the legal team, with Dr. Orly Taitz, which tries to realize Major Stefan Frederick Cook’s hopes and dreams for a better world and a better America. The rule of Constitutional Law is paramount in this country, and confidence in the Constitutional qualifications and plain honest of our leadership is indispensable. I for one have little or no such confidence in the current administration, I will have no truck or dealings with anyone who impugns this military man’s great, unparalleled courage and dedication to principle.
It is an old joke that “army intelligence is an oxymoron.” Intelligence is sometimes characterized by an individual’s courage to change the things he can, the serenity to accept the things he cannot, and the wisdom to know the difference. Major Stefan Frederick Cook is taking a valiant chance here that he can change the transparency of his government’s leadership and their responsiveness to public concerns. Major Cook’s choice, his decision to risk all for conscience, his bravery, and acumen shown in his statement quoted on this blog below proves just high his “army intelligence” really is. _________________ One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow we may wake up as illegals.
Did he think he could avoid that obvious comment by visiting Ghana instead of Kenya?
Try neighboring Burkina Faso next time. Maybe they won't know what most other Africans know...
what everyone in Kenya knows. _________________ One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow we may wake up as illegals.
Did he think he could avoid that obvious comment by visiting Ghana instead of Kenya?
Try neighboring Burkina Faso next time. Maybe they won't know what most other Africans know...
what everyone in Kenya knows.
Will the American public really get the facts or just another forgery then told to shut up?!!! I mean you have to consider that this is all an elaborate show to just put it all to rest so that the powers that be can continue their NWO agenda?!! _________________ Work Harder Millions on Welfare Depend on You!
I tried to post or link this eyewash for blinded Obots at the LA Times blog.
But the LA Times wouldn't take it. "We're sorry. We cannot post this data."
For those with eyes to see and ears to hear...
1. John Jay advised George Washington specifically to eliminate any possibility of an English nobleman marrying
an American citizen and having a son become the President. The Framers of the Constitution understood a
"natural born Citizen" to be a citizen with no other loyalties at birth, that is, one born in the country of parents
who were then citizens. Every elected President born since 1787 was born on soil under U.S. jurisdiction,
of parents who were both U.S. citizens at the time of that birth.
Until now.
2. Barack Obama Snr., a Kenyan, was a British protected citizen, which made Barack Obama II also
a British protected citizen, whose "birth was governed by British law," as Mr. Obama wrote in his book.
Dual citizenship is prima facie NOT natural born citizenship.
Can anyone explain how a person whose birth was governed by British law could possibly be a natural born citizen
of the United States? We're waiting...
3. The last person who could vouch for Mr. Obama's Hawaiian birth, his Grandmother Dunham in Honolulu,
died the day before the election.
All we have left is a computer-generated image that two or three counterfeiting and forgery experts
have declared a fake. If you doubt their expert testimony, here is a list of a dozen flaws in the computer graphics.
Knock yourself out.
http://www.alipac.us/ftopic-137238-days0-orderasc-1376.html
4. Grandmothers don't lie, politicians do.
His paternal step-grandmother has testified that she was present at his birth in the hospital in Mombasa, Kenya.
His half-sister and half-brother have joined her in that claim. Everyone in Kenya knows he was born in Kenya.
On Nov. 5, the day after the election, the Kenyan National Assembly went on record stating, in reference to Kenyan
celebrations of Mr. Obama’s election victory, that a “Kenyan is ruling the USA,” and declared the day a national holiday.
No one was coming to work that day anyway.
The Kenyan Ambassador to the U.S., H. E. Peter Ogego, speaking of "President-elect Obama," said that his
birthplace [in Kenya] is well-known.
WRIF/Detroit - Fellhauer: “One more quick question, President-elect Obama’s birthplace over in Kenya,
is that going to be a national spot to go visit, where he was born?”
Ogego: “It’s already an attraction. His paternal grandmother is still alive.”
WRIF/Detroit - Fellhauer: “His birthplace, they’ll put up a marker there?”
Ogego: “It would depend on the government. It’s already well known.”
For those who still think Mr. Obama is a natural born citizen and as such is Constitutionally qualified
for the Presidency, your own Ronald Reagan had this to say,
"Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant;
it's just that they know so much that isn't so." _________________ One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow we may wake up as illegals.
Joined: May 16, 2006 Posts: 1941 Location: Getyourassoutahere, Texas
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 12:31 am Post subject:
Minuteman, as you have well indicated, Obama's cronies are busy cleaning and controlling the internet and media. This is pretty scary stuff and I wonder how many people even realize what's happening right under their noses?!
MinutemanCDC_SC wrote:
I tried to post or link this eyewash for blinded Obots at the LA Times blog.
But the LA Times wouldn't take it. "We're sorry. We cannot post this data."
For those with eyes to see and ears to hear...
1. John Jay advised George Washington specifically to eliminate any possibility of an English nobleman marrying
an American citizen and having a son become the President. The Framers of the Constitution understood a
"natural born Citizen" to be a citizen with no other loyalties at birth, that is, one born in the country of parents
who were then citizens. Every elected President born since 1787 was born on soil under U.S. jurisdiction,
of parents who were both U.S. citizens at the time of that birth.
Until now.
2. Barack Obama Snr., a Kenyan, was a British protected citizen, which made Barack Obama II also
a British protected citizen, whose "birth was governed by British law," as Mr. Obama wrote in his book.
Dual citizenship is prima facie NOT natural born citizenship.
Can anyone explain how a person whose birth was governed by British law could possibly be a natural born citizen
of the United States? We're waiting...
3. The last person who could vouch for Mr. Obama's Hawaiian birth, his Grandmother Dunham in Honolulu,
died the day before the election.
All we have left is a computer-generated image that two or three counterfeiting and forgery experts
have declared a fake. If you doubt their expert testimony, here is a list of a dozen flaws in the computer graphics.
Knock yourself out.
http://www.alipac.us/ftopic-137238-days0-orderasc-1376.html
4. Grandmothers don't lie, politicians do.
His paternal step-grandmother has testified that she was present at his birth in the hospital in Mombasa, Kenya.
His half-sister and half-brother have joined her in that claim. Everyone in Kenya knows he was born in Kenya.
On Nov. 5, the day after the election, the Kenyan National Assembly went on record stating, in reference to Kenyan
celebrations of Mr. Obama’s election victory, that a “Kenyan is ruling the USA,” and declared the day a national holiday.
No one was coming to work that day anyway.
The Kenyan Ambassador to the U.S., H. E. Peter Ogego, speaking of "President-elect Obama," said that his
birthplace [in Kenya] is well-known.
WRIF/Detroit - Fellhauer: “One more quick question, President-elect Obama’s birthplace over in Kenya,
is that going to be a national spot to go visit, where he was born?”
Ogego: “It’s already an attraction. His paternal grandmother is still alive.”
WRIF/Detroit - Fellhauer: “His birthplace, they’ll put up a marker there?”
Ogego: “It would depend on the government. It’s already well known.”
For those who still think Mr. Obama is a natural born citizen and as such is Constitutionally qualified
for the Presidency, your own Ronald Reagan had this to say,
"Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant;
it's just that they know so much that isn't so."
_________________ ...I call on you in the name of Liberty, of patriotism & everything dear to the American character, to come to our aid...
William Barret Travis
Letter From The Alamo Feb 24, 1836
Joined: Nov 29, 2008 Posts: 624 Location: Portland, ME
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 6:50 am Post subject:
MinutemanCDC_SC wrote:
I tried to post or link this eyewash for blinded Obots at the LA Times blog.
But the LA Times wouldn't take it. "We're sorry. We cannot post this data."
MinuteMan,
I've never tried to do the online submission to any news paper. My only contact with the newspapers in the past has been through the opinion pages, and even on those pages there have often been topic filters - for about twenty years I can recall - maybe forever, I don't know. Having said that, the days of news print may have past.
I think conservative, Christian, law abiding folks missed the boat by not having more news channels of their own. Even the Christian Science Monitor (Boston) has stopped its newspaper printing and has an online presence only.
In the LA basin, Orange County is the conservative stronghold. You might try the Orange County Register (http://www.ocregister.com/) - it's the newspaper for all conservative readers, and I would bet there are already articles and submissions on this topic. _________________ 'No arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is as formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women.'- Ronald Reagan
Joined: Aug 17, 2007 Posts: 4443 Location: Indiana, formerly of Northern Cal
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 9:47 am Post subject:
I have hope, but I am afraid something is going to happen to stop this judge _________________ Proud American and wife of a wonderful <strong>LEGAL</strong> immigrant from Ireland.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing." -Edmund Burke (1729-1797)
A U.S. Army Reserve major from Florida scheduled to report for deployment to Afghanistan within days has had his military orders revoked after arguing he should not be required to serve under a president who has not proven his eligibility for office.
His attorney, Orly Taitz, confirmed to WND the military has rescinded his impending deployment orders.
"We won! We won before we even arrived," she said with excitement. "It means that the military has nothing to show for Obama. It means that the military has directly responded by saying Obama is illegitimate – and they cannot fight it. Therefore, they are revoking the order!"
She continued, "They just said, 'Order revoked.' No explanation. No reasons – just revoked."
A hearing on the questions raised by Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook, an engineer who told WND he wants to serve his country in Afghanistan, was scheduled for July 16 at 9:30 a.m.
"As an officer in the armed forces of the United States, it is [my] duty to gain clarification on any order we may believe illegal. With that said, if President Obama is found not to be a 'natural-born citizen,' he is not eligible to be commander-in-chief," he told WND only hours after the case was filed.
"[Then] any order coming out of the presidency or his chain of command is illegal. Should I deploy, I would essentially be following an illegal [order]. If I happened to be captured by the enemy in a foreign land, I would not be privy to the Geneva Convention protections," he said.
The order for the hearing in the federal court for the Middle District of Georgia from U.S. District Judge Clay D. Land said the hearing on the request for a temporary restraining order would be held Thursday.
Want to turn up the pressure to learn the facts? Get your signs and postcards asking for the president's birth certificate documentation here.
Cook said without a legitimate president as commander-in-chief, members of the U.S. military in overseas actions could be determined to be "war criminals and subject to prosecution."
He said the vast array of information about Obama that is not available to the public confirms to him "something is amiss."
"That and the fact the individual who is occupying the White House has not been entirely truthful with anybody," he said. "Every time anyone has made an inquiry, it has been either cast aside, it has been maligned, it has been laughed at or just dismissed summarily without further investigation.
"You know what. It would be so simple to solve. Just produce the long-form document, certificate of live birth," he said.
Cook said he was scheduled to report for duty tomorrow, on July 15, to deploy to Afghanistan as part of President Obama's plan to increase pressure of insurgent forces there.
He told WND he would be prepared for a backlash against him as a military officer, since members of the military swear to uphold and follow their orders. However, he noted that following an illegal order would be just as bad as failing to follow a legal order.
Before news of the orders being revoked were reported, MSNBC anchor Keith Olbermann tonight called Cook a "jackass" and Taitz a "conwoman," as he labeled both of them the "worst persons in the world." He flayed the soldier as "an embarrassment to all those who have served without cowardice."
Named as defendants in the case are Col. Wanda Good, Col. Thomas Macdonald, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and Obama, described as "de facto president of the United States."
According to the court filing, Cook affirmed when he joined the military, he took the following oath: "I, Stefan Frederick Cook, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the president of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to the regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."
According to the claim, "Plaintiff submits that it is implicit though not expressly stated that an officer is and should be subject to court-martial, because he will be derelict in the performance of his duties, if he does not inquire as to the lawfulness, the legality, the legitimacy of the orders which he has received, whether those orders are specific or general."
The military courts offer no option for raising the question, so he turned to civilian courts to consider "a question of paramount constitutional and legal importance: the validity of the chain of command under a president whose election, eligibility, and constitutional status appear open to serious question."
"Barack Hussein Obama, in order to prove his constitutional eligibility to serve as president, basically needs only produce a single unique historical document for the Plaintiff’s inspection and authentication: namely, the 'long-form' birth certificate which will confirm whether Barack Hussein Obama was in fact born to parents who were both citizens of the United States in Honolulu, Hawaii, in or about 1961," explains the complaint.
Taitz said she will attend the hearing to amend the temporary restraining order to an injunction because more members of the military have joined the cause.
"We are going to be asking for release of Obama's records because now this completely undermines the military. It revoked this order, but it can come up with another order tomorrow. It can come up with orders for other people," she said. "Am I going to be flying around the country 1,000 times and paying the fees every time they issue an order?"
Taitz said the issue "must be resolved immediately," and she will continue working to ensure Obama proves he is eligible for office.
"We're going to be asking the judge to issue an order for Obama to provide his vital records to show he is legitimately president," she said. "We're going to say, we have orders every day, and we'll have revocations every day. This issue has to be decided."
She said there cannot be any harm to the president if he is legitimately holding office.
"If he is legitimate, then his vital records will prove it," Taitz said. "If he is illegitimate, then he should not have been there in the first place."
Asked what this decision means for every other serviceman who objects to deployment under a president who has not proven he is eligible for office, Taitz responded:
"Now, we can have each and every member of the military – each and every enlistee and officer – file something similar saying 'I will not take orders until Obama is legitimately vetted.'"
Multiple questions have been raised about what that would mean to the 2008 election, to the orders and laws Obama has signed and other issues, including whether he then is a valid commander-in-chief of the military.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ _________________ 'No arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is as formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women.'- Ronald Reagan
Obama eligibility case will be heard on merits !!
Please distribute everywhere.
Just got off the phone with Orly Taitz, the attorney in Keyes v. Obama.
At the hearing today at the Federal Court building in Santa Ana, Judge Carter said the following:
1. There will be a trial.
2. It will be heard on the merits.
3. Nothing will be dismissed on proceedural issues.
4. The trial will be expeditious, and the judge pledged to give case priority.
5. Being a former Marine he realizes the importance of having a Constitutionally qualified POTUS/CINC.
6. Judge stated that if Obama isn’t Constitutionally qualifed he needs to leave the White House.
The DOJ will be involved with the case also…. I wasn’t clear if they would be trying to get to the truth or they would just be blindly representing Obama.
Orly will be adding members of the military from California as plaintiffs also.This is from what my interpretation of our conversation.Orly, asked me to disseminate this information out for her, she will be doing a posting later after she gets some sleep.
Please say a prayer of protection for Orly, her family, and Judge Carter. Please also pray that the truth will come to light regarding Obama and justice will be done.
Dr Orly Taitz, Esq site here!
WOOHOO!!!
*****
I believe that Obama is a fraud and a liar, but I'm sorry, I don't think this California lawsuit is going anywhere.
I have the sad feeling that this California judge will quickly dismiss this lawsuit like other judges across the country have done several times in the past.
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 12:21 pm Post subject: Re: BORN IN THE USA?
WorldNetDaily.com wrote:
Bombshell: Orders revoked for soldier challenging prez
Major victory for Army warrior questioning Obama's birthplace
"We won! We won before we even arrived," she said with excitement. "It means that the military has nothing to show for Obama. It means that the military has directly responded by saying Obama is illegitimate – and they cannot fight it. Therefore, they are revoking the order!"
She continued, "They just said, 'Order revoked.' No explanation. No reasons – just revoked."
Maj. Cook won, but it is a calculated concession by the military. They avoided a court decision which would establish a precedent for other military personnel who want orders issued through a legitimate chain of command, that is, one headed by a lawful, Constitutionally eligible, Commander-in-Chief.
Or maybe the Army felt this particular case was just too much trouble.
Without regard to the legitimacy of the CinC, or even if there were no CinC, the military must independently maintain its internal authority and its ability to issue orders. In other words, the CinC is not the identity of the military, and the military is more than an agent of the CinC; it exists in its own right. And that's a good thing.
It would have been hard for the military attorneys to claim that Maj. Stefan Cook did not have standing to bring suit, especially since he was the defendant.
It is widely known throughout Europe and Africa that Kenyan-born Barack Obama is not a lawful U.S. President. Therefore, it would have been impossible to claim that Maj. Cook's argument was specious, that the Geneva Convention would not protect him if he were captured.
In this case in the U.S. District Court in Columbus, Georgia, are the three notorious, "devil's advocate" law firms, involved?
____________________________________________________
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
U.S. ARMY HUMAN RESOURCES COMMAND
1 RESERVE WAY
ST. LOUIS, MO 63132-5200
AHRC-PLM-S 14 JUL 2009
ORDERS A-06-916551R
COOK STEFAN FREDERICK EAD8 MAJ EN 000 00 0000
W096AA
THE FOLLOWING ORDER IS REVOKED OR RESCINDED AS SHOWN.
ACTION: REVOKE
SO MUCH OF: FORMAT 162 A-06-916551 AHRC DATED 09 JUN 2009
After nearly six months of postponements in Keyes v. Obama, Mr. Obama's defense attorneys didn't even show up in court! The U.S. Attorneys had to step in, even though Orly Taitz maintained that Mr. Obama was not eligible for taxpayer-provided counsel as President in a case filed before the inauguration.
Perhaps his 3 law firms decided the U.S. District Court in Santa Ana, California (convenient to Hollywood), should be the scene of the showdown.
Please offer ideas about why Mr. Obama's civilian attorneys chose to default at the opening hearing. _________________ One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow we may wake up as illegals.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Contribute/Join
Forum FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Therefore, it would have been impossible to claim that Maj. Cook's argument was specious, that the Geneva Convention would not protect him if he were captured.