Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    8,399

    Firms targeted on immigration

    http://www.charlotte.com/mld/charlotte/ ... 393049.htm

    Posted on Fri, Apr. 21, 2006

    Firms targeted on immigration

    1 day after raids, feds vow charges for illegal hiring


    JIM MORRILL AND DÁNICA COTO
    jmorrill@charlotteobserver.comdcoto@charlotteobserver.com

    A day after agents arrested nearly 1,200 illegal immigrants around the country -- including 44 in Charlotte -- federal officials announced they will pursue criminal charges against employers who hire undocumented workers.

    Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff pledged to "come down as hard as possible" on violators who "knowingly and recklessly" hire illegal immigrants. Up to now such employers have faced only administrative fines.

    In Charlotte, employers and workers reacted warily. Spanish radio stations received calls from Latino workers who said their managers told them to stay home because they feared being investigated, said Raquel Lynch, a Latin American Coalition director.

    "It seems everyone's in panic mode," she said. "Some wonder whether their loved ones should be at work."

    Charlotte immigration lawyer Miguel Manna said about six companies called him Thursday morning requesting audits of I-9 forms, which employers must fill out for new hires.

    The companies told him Wednesday's nationwide raid scared them because executives were not only fined but arrested, he said.

    Agents arrested seven current and former executives of Texas-based IFCO Systems, the nation's largest pallet company. They were charged with conspiracy to transport and harbor illegal immigrants, charges that carry penalties of up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine for each undocumented worker.

    Authorities also arrested 1,187 IFCO employees in raids at 40 plants in 26 states.

    Officials said the 44 arrested at the company's west Charlotte site are immigrants from Mexico and Guatemala. Most were released and told to appear before immigration authorities in Atlanta.

    All were in the U.S. illegally, according to agent Jeff Jordan of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Charlotte office. Two of the 44 had prior deportation orders. They are in custody and will be deported, he said.

    Wayne Cooper, the state's honorary Mexican consul, said he met Thursday with several of those arrested and their families. Most are men in their 30s.

    He said he was surprised that most workers were released, unlike most of the 66 illegal immigrants arrested in 2002 after authorities raided Charlotte/Douglas International Airport.

    With immigration legislation -- including a proposed guest-worker program -- stalled in Congress, the subject has emerged as one of Americans' top concerns.

    A Gallup Poll released Thursday showed 19 percent of Americans call it the most important issue facing the country. Only the war in Iraq was named as the top concern by more people.

    And a new poll by the Raleigh-based Civitas Institute, a conservative think tank, found that 74 percent of N.C. voters support tougher penalties for employers.

    Uphill battle expected

    Despite Thursday's announcement, workplace enforcement will continue to be a challenge.According to congressional testimony, immigration officials devoted 9 percent of their staff to work-site enforcement in 1999. Four years later it was 4 percent.

    President Bush's proposed budget calls for 171 new agents spread across the country. That's against an estimated 7 million undocumented workers who take home regular paychecks.

    Nearly half the Carolinas' estimated 390,000 illegal immigrants hold jobs. But fines have been rare. Across the country, immigration officials filed only three "notices of intent" to fine employers in 2004.

    A fine line for employers

    Employers say they do the best they can. They must fill out I-9 forms for every worker hired, regardless of nationality. New hires -- immigrants or not -- must show proof of identity and work authorization. The latter could include a Social Security card or a U.S. birth certificate.

    Employers have to inspect the documents and vouch that they "appear to be genuine."

    But fake documents are being bought and sold across the nation. "And a lot of them look pretty good," says immigration attorney Steve Garfinkel of Charlotte.

    Employers risk discrimination lawsuits if they question documents too aggressively, especially if they target one type of worker, such as those who don't speak English.

    Robert Hambright, CEO of Centex Construction in Charlotte, said the certification role belongs with government, not employers. He'd like to see a guest-worker program.

    "(Immigrant workers) are dependable, reliable people," he said. "They show up ahead of time, work hard and are drug-free. You can't say that about their counterparts."


    Several of the Charlotte area's largest companies go beyond the standard I-9 process and ensure that the Social Security numbers of prospective employees are valid. They include Duke Energy, Wachovia, Sonic Automotive, Family Dollar, Compass Group, Goodrich and Bank of America.

    Lowe's is among the most thorough, sending a list of its employees' Social Security numbers each year to the Social Security Administration for verification.

    Does the current system work?

    No, says immigration lawyer Manna.

    "The government asks the companies to do something that's not their job. They're not document experts and can't spot fake documents," Manna says.

    Victor Cerda, former acting director of Homeland Security's Detention and Removal Office, now a Washington attorney, said he believes the employer crackdown can work even with tight resources.

    "You will see stronger enforcement. Are you going to see the ability to go to every employer out there and knock on their door and inspect their work force? There are way too many employers for that."

    -- staff writers STELLA HOPKINS, LISA HAMMERSLY MUNN, Peter st. onge and Mitch Weiss contributed.

    Jim Morrill: (704) 358-5059

    Verifying Identity

    Employers can verify the authenticity of a Social Security number in several ways.

    Private firms offer background checks. And free federal databases also can help. One, a joint effort of Social Security and the Department of Homeland Security, taps both agencies' records.

    An online program from Social Security can verify up to 250,000 numbers. A phone-in program can verify up to five at a time. Call (800) 772-6270 from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. weekdays.

    Or you can verify up to 50 numbers by taking a list to the closest Social Security office.

    None can be used to pre-screen applicants, only to verify documents for employees. Critics say the databases can be cumbersome and inaccurate.

    For information, go to www.ssa.gov or http://uscis.gov/graphics/

    services/save.htm.

    -- Sources: Social Security Administration, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

    -- STELLA HOPKINS.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    67,765
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Lone Star State of Chaos
    Posts
    671
    It would seem to me that the inability to speak English would raise a red flag?? They had to have gone to some effort in order to interview those who don't speak English..like hiring an interpreter.

    There are too many ways provided to check the eligibility of a propective employee to swallow the bilge of 'the papers looked okay'. Trying to put the responsibility for their hires back in the lap of government doesn't work...or have we been without personal responsibility for too long now?

    $250,000 fines per illegal plus 10 years in jail is serious punishment...and I like it. That should shiver a whole buncha them right down to their timbers.

    MJ

  4. #4
    Senior Member Darlene's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,200
    A Gallup Poll released Thursday showed 19 percent of Americans call it the most important issue facing the country.
    I would like to know where they take these polls. What BS.

  5. #5
    Senior Member RonLaws's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    400
    Here is a bunch of bull once again by the Charlotte Observer. This rag newspaper will defend illegal Aliens at every turn. Calling them just "Immigrants" or "workers", etc.


    So much for Bush's and Cherthoff's statement to end 'catch and release' policy. These illegal Aliens need full bore deportation. Too bad -- learn the lesson.

  6. #6
    Senior Member RonLaws's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    400
    Don't believe it folks. This is a ploy by the Bush Adminstration to make Americans think that they should 'lay back' on the "guest-worker" program. There should be no let down that illegal Aliens be allowed legal status".

  7. #7
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207

    token enforcement to relieve election year political heat

    Remember, there were about 1500 convictions for employing illegals between 1994 and 1998.

    In 1999, someone commanded the INS (or BP?) to stand down, and convictions dropped precipitously.

    In 2004, there were only 4 convictions.

    In 2005, there were only 3 convictions.


    Even 100,000 convictions a year wouldn't put a dent in 11 to 23 million illegal aliens, depending upon which crystal ball reader you believe. A million convictions a year might be a good start though. Fat chance of THAT.

    But the ABCI unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) program in Nogales, AZ, did count 853,000 illegal crossers, of which 698,000 were not apprehended, in three months of 2004, between June and September, the most deadly time of the year to cross. That expands to about 2.8 million illegal entrants not apprehended in 2004, just in the Tucson Sector. Many of those go back and forth, so that doesn't constitute a net gain of 2.8 million illegal aliens in the U.S. for the Tucson Sector. But your guess of what it does amount to is as good as anyone else's.

    The U.S. Border Patrol covers nine Mexican border sectors: San Diego, El Centro (CA), Yuma, Tucson, El Paso, Del Rio, Marfa, Laredo, and Rio Grande Valley. The Tucson Sector is the most active.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •