• Poll: Conservative Support for Marco Rubio Plummets over Amnesty for illegals

    ALIPAC NOTE: And Marco Rubio proves what we already know from traitor John McCain. Supporting Amnesty for illegal aliens is a lose lose position for Republicans. Neither Conservatives nor legal American Hispanics support amnesty for illegals like Marco Rubio and his slimy 'Gang of 8' do! This kind of massive loss of support from Conservative should be expected by Republicans like McCain, Graham, Flake, and Rubio that support Barack Obama's illegal alien amnesty agenda!

    -----------------------

    Poll: Conservative Support for Marco Rubio Plummets




    by A.J. Delgado 15 May 2013, 11:45 AM PDT
    Breitbart News

    The latest Public Policy Polling data bears sobering news for Senator Marco Rubio, showing his support among conservatives has substantially decreased since last month.

    When asked for their preferred GOP candidate, only 17% of “very conservative” respondents favored Rubio, while only 18% of “somewhat conservative” respondents favored Rubio.

    This is a steep decline from the same poll’s findings in April, when Rubio’s support was 26% among the“very conservative” and 22% among the “somewhat conservative.”

    The survey was conducted between May 6–9th. The survey released in April was conducted between March 27–30th. The "Gang of 8" bill, spearheaded by Senator Rubio, was released April 17th. (The Gang of 8 bill is the Obama supported illegal immigrant amnesty bill that conservative US Senator Jim Demint of the Heritage Foundation says will cost taxpayers 6.3 Trillion additional dollars in the first 10 years!)

    Notably, Rubio’s support among Hispanics also appears to have decreased following the unveiling of the "Gang of 8" bill. The previous poll demonstrated 39% of Hispanics had a favorable view of Rubio, while the latest poll demonstrates that number has decreased to 34%.
    This article was originally published in forum thread: Poll: Conservative Support for Marco Rubio Plummets started by ALIPAC View original post