• 10 reasons why Rubio should hate his immigration amnesty bill



    If Sen. Marco Rubio ever grows tired of basking in Sen. Chuck Schumer’s praise and takes time to carefully analyze the 1197-page Senate immigration bill that he co-sponsored, he’ll probably be unpleasantly surprised by what he discovers:

    1.) Even if the bill becomes law, most people who try to enter the United States without permission or overstay their welcome will be able to do so. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has estimated (in its July 3, 2013 letter to Sen. Patrick Leahy) that the Senate bill will reduce the number of individuals entering or staying in the United States without permission by between one-third and one-half.

    2.) The CBO’s estimate is too optimistic given President Obama’s penchant for picking and choosing which laws he’ll enforce and making up his own rules when it suits him. Besides, the bill itself gives the administration ample opportunities to legally waive measures to control immigration.

    David Gibberman
    The Daily Caller
    07/17/2013

    3.) After telling the estimated 11.5 million individuals now in the United States without permission that they have a legal right to stay, we’ll still have an increasing number of individuals living here without permission – 7.5 million 10 years from now, according to the CBO in its June 18 report.

    4.) Which means that we’ll still have sanctuary cities, some people demanding greater security measures, some people insisting that those here without permission be given the legal right to stay, and everyone telling Congress that something needs to be done to fix our broken immigration system.

    5.) It’s anyone’s guess what, if any, federal benefits those given permission to stay will be eligible to receive. As the CBO charitably noted (on page 25 of the June 18 cost estimate), it’s “not made clear” how Section 2101 should be interpreted.

    6.) Criminals will be allowed to stay in the United States (Section 2101 at pages 139-140). Individuals convicted of one felony or three or more misdemeanors are ineligible to legally stay in the country. But for individuals who have been charged with a felony but not convicted or who have plea bargained a felony down to a misdemeanor, the bill grants the government’s permission to stay.

    7.) Most people won’t have to pay back taxes as a precondition for receiving permission to stay in our country (Section 2101 at pages 146-147). Individuals are required to pay only federal income taxes that the IRS has “assessed,” meaning officially recorded. If an individual hasn’t filed tax returns or been audited by the IRS — both are unlikely if the IRS has had no knowledge of the individual’s existence — no federal back taxes will have to be paid. There is no requirement that state or local taxes be paid.
    This article was originally published in forum thread: 10 reasons why Rubio should hate his immigration bill started by Jean View original post