Thread: Canadian's Opposition Group

http://www.commonfrontiers.ca/mediar...elease_EN.html

PRESS STATEMENT
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Harper must come clean about the
Security and Prosperity Partnership

March 27th, 2006 - One year after the launch of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North American (SPP), the respective leaders of Canada, the United States and Mexico are about to meet again, this time in Cancun (Mexico), to advance the ongoing integration of North America. Meanwhile, citizens and elected officials are still being kept in the dark about the process.

The pact signed in Waco last year by Paul Martin, George Bush and Vicente Fox, contains no concrete proposals to improve the lives of the continent's ordinary citizens. The agreement stems from the big business agenda and represents a giant step toward full continental integration.

The SPP initiative is intended to harmonize many Canadian and Mexican domestic and foreign policies with those of the U.S. Under the guise of protecting citizens from the threat of terrorism and also facilitating trade, this initiative would involve drastic measures such as a deeper integration of North American energy markets, harmonized treatment of immigrants, refugees or tourists from abroad, and the creation of common security policies. It also promotes steps towards harmonized standards in areas governing health, food safety and the environment.

Sold to the public as merely administrative and regulatory in nature, the SPP agenda is evolving away from the public eye. Tellingly, 15 top CEOs have been invited to join the leader’s summit in Cancun. “The presumptions of the business-led agenda are clear in the wording describing the SPP process where private sector leaders can get high-level meetings, other stakeholders get round table consultations, while the democratic representatives of the citizens only get briefings,” said John Foster of Common Frontiers.

According to Pierre-Yves Serinet, coordinator of the Réseau Québécois sur l’Intégration Continentale (RQIC), the SPP would not survive public scrutiny in any of the three countries. “If Stephen Harper truly believes in transparency and accountability, he has the responsibility of putting the SPP before parliament and the Canadian public. Otherwise, he should not proceed with this agenda.”

Common Frontiers, RQIC, the Mexican Action Network on Free Trade (RMALC), and the Alliance for Responsible Trade (ART-USA) are all members of the Hemispheric Social Alliance, a network that has played a central role in opposing ‘free trade’ negotiations throughout the Americas. The four North American coalitions are representative of a range of organizations including church groups, labour, student unions, women’s groups, environmental organizations, international development agencies, human rights and other social justice advocates.

For more information, please contact:
Rick Arnold, Common Frontiers: Tel (905) 352-2430; comfront@web.ca
Pierre-Yves Serinet, RQIC: Tel. (514) 383-2266 ext. 222; rqic@ciso.qc.ca
Juan Manuel Sandoval, RMALC : Tel. 011 (525) 659-3679; spechf@laneta.apc.org
Tom Loudon, ART-USA: Tel. (301) 699-0042; toml@quixote.org

It's just me.....but I think they have been given the same line as us.

They don't have a good military. And like the rest of the free world keep expecting us to hang our ass out on the line for them. It's easy spending somebody elses money. It's easy hanging somebody's elses ass out on the line to dry. Who ever really STANDS WITH US? No-one. Canada is, land wise a huge nation. But they are a subsidiary of England and France. They still Honor the Queen. They never quite made the BREAK the US did. They still see themselves as a part of England and France.

America doesn't!! It was what made us great.

They are already a part of the EURO. We aren't. Now......I don't know anymore.........

This is an organization of Canadian as well as South American citizens who are ojecting to the secrecy with which NAFTA, CAFTA, PSP and the pending FTAA have been negotiated without the consent of the citizens it affects most.

Its not about military. It is about securing nation's individual assets (i.e. water is their major concern) and protecting the rights of their constitutions and sovereignty of their nations.