Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Moscow on the Willamette, Oregon
    Posts
    653

    Asylum Admissions Being Expandedâ€

    From Oregonians for Immigration Reform:

    July 20, 2009

    OFIR Members and Friends:

    On Sunday, The Oregonian featured on its front page an article, “Special visas help abused immigrants,â€
    Check your credit report regularly, an illegal may be using your Social Security number.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Moscow on the Willamette, Oregon
    Posts
    653

    Asylum Admissions Being Expandedâ€

    From Oregonians for Immigration Reform:

    July 20, 2009

    OFIR Members and Friends:

    On Sunday, The Oregonian featured on its front page an article, “Special visas help abused immigrants,â€
    Check your credit report regularly, an illegal may be using your Social Security number.

  3. #3
    Senior Member builditnow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    A Midwest State in North AmeXica
    Posts
    1,845
    However, DHS directly contradicted federal law and argued that the woman "could qualify for asylum…based on alternative particular social group formulations." DHS went on in its brief to lay out "two such formulations," thereby affirming the Obama Administration's support for extending asylum to victims of domestic violence. DHS ultimately recommended that the case be returned to a lower court for further consideration. (DHS Supplemental Brief, April 13, 2009).
    Obama Admin going to find any way possible to bring in as many foreigners as possible and/or grant de facto amnesty to as many illegal aliens as possible, without Congress' approval. They will just change whatever policies they want.

    Eventually all it will take to meet "refugee" eligibility will be "anyone under emotional distress because they want to live in the U.S.".

    According to The New York Times, both the Clinton Administration and the Bush Administration considered whether to extend asylum to victims of domestic violence in foreign nations. Ultimately both decided against this policy shift, fearing the opening of "a floodgate of asylum petitions from battered women across the globe." The Obama Administration, however, seems committed to moving ahead with the extension despite its consequences here in the U.S. and abroad where reform is most needed. (The New York Times, July 15, 2009).
    Because Obama Admin doesn't give a crap about the consequences to the U.S. of anything. They don't care about the U.S. It is evil and owes the whole world and is responsible to take care of the world.
    <div>Number*U.S. military*in S.Korea to protect their border with N.Korea: 28,000. Number*U.S. military*on 2000 mile*U.S. southern border to protect ourselves from*the war in our own backyard: 1,200 National Guard.</

  4. #4
    Senior Member builditnow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    A Midwest State in North AmeXica
    Posts
    1,845
    However, DHS directly contradicted federal law and argued that the woman "could qualify for asylum…based on alternative particular social group formulations." DHS went on in its brief to lay out "two such formulations," thereby affirming the Obama Administration's support for extending asylum to victims of domestic violence. DHS ultimately recommended that the case be returned to a lower court for further consideration. (DHS Supplemental Brief, April 13, 2009).
    Obama Admin going to find any way possible to bring in as many foreigners as possible and/or grant de facto amnesty to as many illegal aliens as possible, without Congress' approval. They will just change whatever policies they want.

    Eventually all it will take to meet "refugee" eligibility will be "anyone under emotional distress because they want to live in the U.S.".

    According to The New York Times, both the Clinton Administration and the Bush Administration considered whether to extend asylum to victims of domestic violence in foreign nations. Ultimately both decided against this policy shift, fearing the opening of "a floodgate of asylum petitions from battered women across the globe." The Obama Administration, however, seems committed to moving ahead with the extension despite its consequences here in the U.S. and abroad where reform is most needed. (The New York Times, July 15, 2009).
    Because Obama Admin doesn't give a crap about the consequences to the U.S. of anything. They don't care about the U.S. It is evil and owes the whole world and is responsible to take care of the world.
    <div>Number*U.S. military*in S.Korea to protect their border with N.Korea: 28,000. Number*U.S. military*on 2000 mile*U.S. southern border to protect ourselves from*the war in our own backyard: 1,200 National Guard.</

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    11,242
    And I suppose that those granted asylum will also be able to vote.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    11,242
    And I suppose that those granted asylum will also be able to vote.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •