Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Populist's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    8,085

    1 Step Forward, 3 Steps Back (No-Match Being Rescinded)

    National Review Online
    the corner
    Wednesday, July 08, 2009

    One Step Forward, Three Steps Back [Mark Krikorian]

    The administration has announced that it's abandoning an important immigration initative that would have identified large numbers of illegal immigrants in the workforce. To camouflage this capitulation, the same press release reiterates a promise to finally implement a different, much smaller initative.

    Specifically, the Social Security No-Match Rule is being rescinded. This would have notified companies of employees whose numbers and names don't match, and laid out a series of steps to take that would offer a safe harbor to employers so they wouldn't be charged with knowingly employing illegal aliens. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the ACLU, and the AFL-CIO (the Axis of Open Borders) joined in a lawsuit against the rule, which has been blocked by court order. By rescinding the rule, the administration has conveniently removed the need to pursue appeals of the judge's descision.

    At the same time, DHS has said it will, at long last, implement the rule requiring federal contractors to use E-Verify, the online system for checking new hires. This is a good thing, because they've delayed implementation of the rule three times now. But the idea that the two initiatives are equivalent is transparently false — the no-match rule would have identified large numbers of currently employed illegal-alien workers (most of whom work on the books with fake or stolen numbers), whereas the federal-contractor rule, while an important step in creating momentum, applied only to new hires, and wouldn't end up actually affecting that many people — Lockheed Martin and Raytheon just aren't likely to be employing a lot of illegal aliens on federal contracts.

    Both Obama and Schumer have acknowledged that the administration needs real credibility on enforcement if it's ever going to get enough votes in Congress for amnesty, and implementing the federal-contractor rule could have moved them a little ways in that direction. But by using the federal-contractor rule as window dressing for gutting a much more important measure, the White House has actually sacrificed any credibility the rule might have given them. The administration staffers and leftist constituency groups pushing for amnesty are so maximalist and so intent on getting their way right now that the White House is unable to take the steps necessary to prepare the way politically for amnesty. In a sense, it's good news, because they're torpedoing their chances, but it's also an indication of how brazenly contemptuous of immigration law the policymakers in this White House really are.

    07/08 05:39 PM

    http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/? ... lkYzk5MGU=
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member Populist's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    8,085
    From DHS Press Release:

    Release Date: July 8, 2009

    DHS will be proposing a new regulation rescinding the 2007 No-Match Rule, which was blocked by court order shortly after issuance and has never taken effect.

    http://www.dhs.gov/ynews/releases/pr_1247063976814.shtm

    Secretary Napolitano Strengthens Employment Verification with Administration's Commitment to E-Verify

    Release Date: July 8, 2009

    For Immediate Release
    Office of the Press Secretary
    Contact: 202-282-8010

    Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano today strengthened employment eligibility verification by announcing the Administration’s support for a regulation that will award federal contracts only to employers who use E-Verify to check employee work authorization. The declaration came as Secretary Napolitano announced the Department's intention to rescind the Social Security No-Match Rule, which has never been implemented and has been blocked by court order, in favor of the more modern and effective E-Verify system.

    “E-Verify is a smart, simple and effective tool that reflects our continued commitment to working with employers to maintain a legal workforce,
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member fedupinwaukegan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Waukegan, IL
    Posts
    6,134
    It's getting complicated. So if Vitter's amendment is passed would this over-ride this decision?


    Updated: Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 5:11 PM
    Action Pending on Grassley and Vitter Amendments Senators will soon vote on an amendment (# 1415) by Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) that would allow employers using E-Verify to check the workplace eligibility of all employees, not just new hires. Under current law, E-Verify may only be used for new hires. Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) also is offering an amendment (#1375) that would prevent further delays in the implementation of the "no-match" rule, which allows the Social Security Administration to send letters notifying employers that the Social Security number and personal data of certain employees don't match SSA records (almost always because they are illegal aliens).
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •