Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree12Likes

Thread: 40% vacancy: Feds release illegal immigrant families instead of filling detention cen

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member lorrie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Redondo Beach, California
    Posts
    6,765

    40% vacancy: Feds release illegal immigrant families instead of filling detention cen

    40% vacancy: Feds release illegal immigrant families instead of filling detention centers

    Although the beds were empty, the government was still paying for them



    Sunday, July 15, 2018

    The government pays for thousands of detention beds for illegal immigrant families, but nearly 40 percent of them were sitting unused in late June, even as the Department of Homeland Security was rushing to release parents and children into communities.

    The empty beds were revealed in court documents late last month. Lawyers who monitor U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s facilities said two major facilities were running well below capacity.

    ICE’s biggest facility in Dilley, Texas, can hold 2,400 parents and children — but on June 27 and 28 it was at just 63 percent capacity, with 886 beds empty, the detainee logs showed.

    Although the beds were empty, the government was still paying for them.

    The contractor who operates Dilley “is paid a flat rate of $3.1 million per month to operate the facility regardless of the number of residents, which means that the government saves no money in reducing the number of families processed at the facility,” Wendi Warren H. Binford, a law professor at Willamette University in Oregon, wrote in a sworn declaration to a federal court two weeks ago.

    The vacancies are the latest perplexing facet of the administration’s immigration policy, which, while taking a get-tough approach rhetorically, has been plagued by questionable decisions, policy reversals and confusion.

    “It’s a mystery why they would not want to use this space available,” said Jessica Vaughan, policy studies director at the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for stricter enforcement. “If they have the detention capacity, they should be using it.”

    The space is about to become even more important.

    The Trump administration is rushing to reunite as many as 2,500 more children who were separated from their parents in the confusion surrounding the president’s zero-tolerance border policy.

    The government released more than 50 young children and their parents after reuniting them last week. They were put into an “Alternatives to Detention” program, which usually means either an ankle monitoring device or a program of check-ins designed to make sure they return for their deportation hearings.

    That often doesn’t happen, said officials with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

    “That is not an effective removal tool,” Matthew Albence, a top deportation official, told reporters this month.

    Security analysts say detention is the best way to ensure people appear for their court cases and deportation times.

    ICE said it couldn’t comment on the empty beds because the information was filed as part of a series of ongoing court cases.

    But one Homeland Security official indicated they believe their hands are tied by a court case, the Flores settlement.

    “We are in compliance with the court order,” the official said.

    That 1997 Flores settlement, which originally required the speedy release of children who arrived at the border alone, was updated by Judge Dolly Gee in 2015 to apply to children who come with their parents. Under the new rules, children can be held in ICE custody for only about 20 days.

    Since deportation cases usually take longer than that, the 20-day deadline means the children have to be released into communities. The government usually wants to place children with parents, so it releases the entire family.

    President Trump ordered his attorneys to challenge the Flores settlement and ask Judge Gee for a rethink.

    Those lawyers told Judge Gee that they believe a ruling by another federal court, Judge Dana Sabraw, who set timelines for reunification of families, envisions families being detained together, even beyond 20 days. The administration said that is what it intends to do.

    “The government will not separate families but detain families together during the pendency of immigration proceedings when they are apprehended at or between ports of entry,” the Justice Department said in late June.

    Judge Gee rejected those arguments and said her 20-day guidelines remain in effect.

    That leaves the government struggling to adopt the strictest policy possible within the guidelines set by myriad judges.

    Peter Schey, the lawyer representing the children in the Flores settlement, said the unused space suggests that the government is wrongly claiming an illegal immigration crisis.

    He questioned the terms of the contract that pays out regardless of how much space the government is using.

    “It is shameful that major corporations are reaping massive profits operating family detention centers and being paid tens of millions of dollars regardless of the number of families actually housed and serviced in these facilities,” Mr. Schey said.

    He said the administration could end the contracts and instead use group homes that have been licensed by the federal Housing and Urban Affairs Department and local governments.

    The administration runs three family detention facilities, totaling 3,326 beds, according to a Government Accountability Office report this year.

    The facility in Dilley is the biggest at 2,400 beds, followed by another Texas facility in Karnes. A third, small facility in Pennsylvania, the Berks Family Residential Center, has fewer than 100 beds.

    For years, the government had only Berks, but when the number of illegal immigrant children and families surged in 2014, the Obama administration scrambled to open the other two facilities in Texas.

    The facilities have been a target for immigrant rights activists who oppose detention of most illegal immigrants, and of families in particular. The government’s chief watchdog, the GAO, questioned the government’s budgeting decisions in its report this year.

    The Dilley facility’s contract nears $40 million a year.

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...cilities-belo/




    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty
    by joining our E-mail Alerts athttp://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    MW
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,717
    That leaves the government struggling to adopt the strictest policy possible within the guidelines set by myriad judges.
    Damn these liberal court judges and the leftist illegal alien supporting organizations and individuals that file these lawsuits! They're throwing a crimp into everything the administration is attempting to do so we can regain control of our border and illegal immigrant problem. This is very frustrating for the DHS, DOJ, and President Trump, not to mention folks like us.

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttps://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Senior Member Captainron's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    8,279
    Yes I can hardly believe that liberals are so energized about this. It is a fervent, religious cause for them. The hypocrisy is so stunning, too, when a lot of these same people have good paying jobs but they still want to hire illegals to do things and trample down the unemployed US citizens. I just put a statement on my mayors FB page that they ought to close down the illegals 'hiring hall' (which they also partially funded) and instead seek ways to get the homeless back to work.

    Also, I get Yahoo news feed and every day there are new schemes to attack Trump. It is simply unrelenting. Of course we know that. Hopefully their Congressional ambitions will be halted, and they will at least get some more conservative factions growing in their Party.
    "Men of low degree are vanity, Men of high degree are a lie. " David
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    Keep up the great work Captainron, you do so much. It's unbelievable that these stupid corrupt cities fund illegal immigration while Americans starve on the streets and stress trying to figure out how to keep a roof over their heads if they have one.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Similar Threads

  1. 195 Per Day — Feds Release 6,051 Illegal Immigrant Kids Into US In Single Month
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-26-2016, 02:06 AM
  2. Feds have lost track of immigrant families released from Texas detention center
    By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-03-2015, 06:00 PM
  3. Judge Rules Against Current Detention System of Illegal Immigrant Families
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-29-2015, 01:56 PM
  4. Feds change rules to allow quicker release of illegal families from detention centers
    By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-24-2015, 06:58 PM
  5. Feds will house immigrant families at detention center near San Antonio
    By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-18-2014, 03:37 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •