Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    Democrats to border states: Drop dead

    WND Exclusive ON CAPITOL HILL

    Democrats to border states: Drop dead

    Senate kills amendments to enhance security, combat illegal immigration

    Posted: May 28, 2010
    12:45 am Eastern
    By Chelsea Schilling
    © 2010 WorldNetDaily

    The Senate has rejected three amendments to an appropriations bill that would have increased funding for security at the U.S.-Mexico border.

    The Senate considered three border-security amendments today to H.R. 4899, the $58.8 billion Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act. The amendments were introduced by senators from Texas and Arizona.

    Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and 10 co-sponsors offered Senate Amendment 4214, which would have provided for 6,000 National Guard troops to support and secure the U.S.-Mexico border. That amendment was rejected by Democrats and Republican Sen. George Voinovich of Ohio.

    Also, Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, and three co-sponsors offered Senate amendment 4202 to use unspent U.S. stimulus dollars to pay for border fence surveillance and monitoring technologies. That amendment was rejected by Democrats and independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont.

    Likewise, Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., offered Senate Amendment 4228, which would have appropriated $200 million for a law enforcement initiative to address illegal crossings of the border. That amendment was also rejected by Democrats and Sen. Sanders.

    Several illegal immigration advocacy groups had called upon members to oppose the amendments, including League of United Latin American Citizens, or LULAC, and the National Council of La Raza.

    As WND reported, the Obama administration announced its decision this week to send 1,200 National Guard troops to the U.S. southern border to counter cross-border drug and weapons trafficking. However, many lawmakers have warned that 1,200 would not be enough.

    Sens. Kyl and McCain said Obama's decision to send an "insufficient number of National guard troops" is a "weak start and does not demonstrate an understanding of the current situation in the region."

    "Our children are living in fear, but the Obama White House is living in denial," said Sen. Cornyn. "The president must make bordersecurity a priority, not an afterthought or an empty talking point."

    However, the State Department announced the National Guard troops will not be used to stop illegal immigration.

    Arizona border residents told Fox News this week that Obama's wavering immigration policy is only making things worse.

    "Every time our president talks to the Mexican president, or every time the word amnesty comes over the Mexican news, there is a flood of people," said one unnamed resident who feared retaliation.

    The residents said troops won't deter illegal aliens and drug smugglers.

    "There's guys out here with no guns, and they're our troops," she said. "The Mexicans think we're nuts."

    Meanwhile, Obama has blasted Arizona's immigration law. He told a May 26 fundraising reception for Barbara Boxer in San Francisco, "Folks are out there looking at the Arizona law, and it's divided the country. Now, I've been very clear. I think the Arizona law was a mistake. And my Justice Department is looking very carefully at the nature of this law."

    As WND recently reported, thousands of illegal aliens apprehended along the 2,000 mile border stretching through California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas aren't even from Mexico. Many are citizens of countries that are known sponsors of terrorism, including Afghanistan, Algeria, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Nigeria, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Yemen, Sudan, Syria and Iran.

    Former Rep. Tom Tancredo told WND he doesn't believe Obama's decision to send troops is intended to improve the situation.

    "I don't think anybody thinks this matters," he said. "Obama certainly doesn't."

    He added, "The desire is not to fix the problem. The desire is to have amnesty. All of this is in anticipation of amnesty."

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=159269
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Mexifornia
    Posts
    9,455
    "Every time our president talks to the Mexican president, or every time the word amnesty comes over the Mexican news, there is a flood of people," said one unnamed resident who feared retaliation.

    The residents said troops won't deter illegal aliens and drug smugglers.

    "There's guys out here with no guns, and they're our troops," she said. "The Mexicans think we're nuts."
    You know...we must be the laughing stock of the entire world based upon how we are dealing with this invasion. It's almost incomprehensible that people who swore to protect our Constitution would respond in such a manner. It's surreal to say the least….
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •