Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member dman1200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    3,631

    Annual Pig Book Traces Taxpayer Spending

    I know this isn't immigration per say, but I wanted to post this because our elected bureaucrats in DC are always saying that we don't have enough green to fund the border patrol, enforce our immigration laws or add any new agents, they say it would be too costly, yet they always find a way to spend our hard earned tax dollars on this crap. Just take a look. It's so disgusting. How do they get away with this? So the next time an elected bureaucrat tells you that they just don't have the money to secure our borders and enforce our immigration laws because it would be too costly then here is another piece of ammunition you can throw right back in their faces. Here goes:

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,152696,00.html

    Annual Pig Book Traces Taxpayer Spending
    Thursday, April 07, 2005

    WASHINGTON â€â€
    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,032
    Thanks, but I don't think I could bear to view the larger list...I've heard a few of the items...nonsense stuff mostly.

    Will says this is just a 'rounding off'?? If you 'round off' often enough, it comes to one heckuva wad of money.

    Does the prez not use his line item veto for fear of spending his political capital?

    RR
    The men who try to do something and fail are infinitely better than those who try to do nothing and succeed. " - Lloyd Jones

  3. #3
    Senior Member dman1200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    3,631
    Does the prez not use his line item veto for fear of spending his political capital?
    He's never used his veto period. He's sorta threatened to use it once or twice, but not on spending. He's just another phony that only gives lip service to fiscal conservatism. He'll cut funds for our homeland defense in the name of being fiscally conservative, but won't hold the line on nonsense spending. I guess he doesn't want to offend his big corporate donors.
    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •