Thread: Lou's Column: More Independent Than Ever (11/16/09)

Lou's Column

More Independent Than Ever

Nov-16-2009

The world's first all-news television network is now a much loved part of my past, and it seems like just yesterday that CNN was only one of Ted Turner's mad dreams.

I'm fortunate enough to be one of the band of renegade journalists who helped build and make Ted's dream a reality almost 30 years ago. Since then the world and this country has changed mightily, so has television news, and so have I.

We broke the ABC, CBS, and NBC TV news oligopoly in 1980, and Microsoft and NBC broke our cable news network monopoly 16 years later. And the internet smashed the idea of controlled news coverage or its dissemination. Television news has been forced to change along with the rest of the country, and the world.

I've changed as well, from so-called objective business reporting, to political reporting, to outright advocacy journalism. Over almost three decades, I've had the opportunity to cover double digit inflation, double digit interest rates and a moribund national economy as well as the greatest economic expansion in the world's history, stock markets that have boomed and busted, the return of our hostages from Iran, and the Persian Gulf War, the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union and Marxist-Leninism.

I've covered news, good and bad, on all but one continent in that time.

And I reported as correspondent and anchor, as both a business and general news journalist. The iconic Wall Streeter Felix Rohatyn correctly prophesized that economic journalists would become the modern equivalent of 20th century war correspondents. And so they have. But he left unspoken the obvious corollary: our markets and economies have become battlefields, and while there is little blood, there can be widespread devastation and mind-numbing losses.

In our 21st century political economy, the losses often fall heaviest on the innocent and the unsuspecting. I believe that we live in a critically pivotal time, a period that historians and economists will examine for centuries. The decisions we are making and policies we enact will have a profound impact on our nation and the American people for generations.

This great democratic republic made our capitalistic economy possible, and that free enterprise economy has sustained our way of live for over two hundred years. Our freedom and our capitalism have been the envy of the world, and I believe they have never been more imperiled.

That's why I can't be neutral on the issues that frame our time. And why I'm considering new opportunities, new directions that will allow me to help inform and lead the debate as we rebuild and reinvigorate our national economy. We must figure out how to not only survive and prosper in a more competitive and dangerous world, but to also innovate and create new technologies, but also invigorate and bolster our weakened capitalist system as some seek to destroy it.

I'm excited about our future, and working in a number of areas to overcome the obstacles we face. On my radio show and through other venues, I intend to be a vigorous participant in our national conversation on such issues as the creation of more jobs, sustainable economic growth, the environment, climate change, immigration, health care and military involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The complexity of these issues is exacerbated, and in some cases caused by the lack of true representation in Washington D.C. When is the last time you heard a Congressman or Senator, or President, of either party, speak with respect for the "rule of the majority?" Odd that we almost never hear the expression, given that it's the fundamental tenant of our democratic republic. And where are our business leaders, the CEOs of corporate America? Should the Chamber of Commerce really be the proxy for their individual leadership?

We must urgently revive our economy so that it is able to thrive in a rapidly changing global economy where the old rules no longer are in force. This country became a superpower in part because of a strong, hardworking, independent, upwardly mobile middle class. But our middle class has been severely weakened in recent years. Unless it is revived and begins prospering again, we are lost.

We must have a straightforward, informed and realistic discussion debate of the great issues of our time. Whatever direction I choose in the weeks and months ahead, I will certainly be a full participant in that debate. For all our sakes, I hope you will as well.
Posted by Lou Dobbs Staff at 5:46 PM

http://loudobbs.com/blog?action=viewBlo ... 4490117500

Surprise! Lauer Asks If Dobbs Was 'Too Conservative' For CNN?

By Geoffrey Dickens (Bio | Archive)
November 17, 2009 - 11:42 ET

NBC's Matt Lauer, on Tuesday's Today show, actually asked Lou Dobbs, formerly of CNN, if he and the network parted ways because he was "too conservative" and if CNN was okay with Dobbs' push for immigration reform when he was attacking George W. Bush but wasn't happy when Dobbs started slamming the Obama administration on the issue, as he queried the former CNN host, "You got much less kickback from CNN than when you started to speak out about the policies of Barack Obama. So, was this an issue that CNN wants to appear neutral but maintain a more liberal stance?"

For his part Dobbs claimed the home of the very liberal Rick Sanchez "made it very clear, they wanted the network to go middle of the road and to be very neutral."

The following is the full transcript of the entire segment as it was aired on the November 17, Today show:

MATT LAUER: Lou Dobbs is a former anchor at CNN who abruptly resigned last week from his job as host of "Lou Dobbs Tonight." He's with us exclusively this morning. Lou, good to see you.

LOU DOBBS: Great to be with you, Matt.

LAUER: I want to talk about Sarah Palin.

DOBBS: Alright.

LAUER: I'd love to get your take on her in a second. But I can't introduce you as the guy who resigned abruptly from CNN last week without starting by saying what happened?

DOBBS: Well CNN decided to go one way and ultimately it became clear to both CNN management and myself that we were going to go separate directions, and the primary issue was over the way in which I wanted to anchor a broadcast and host a broadcast and the way in which they wanted to go.

LAUER: The way it's been reported is that, that CNN got tired of your opinions. And I'm curious, do you think CNN got tired of opinions in general? Did, in other words, did they want to stay in the middle of the road, or did they get tired of your specific opinions, too conservative?

DOBBS: Well, well since I take it a little personally, perhaps it was just mine, but they made it very clear, they wanted the network to go middle of the road and to be very neutral. And Matt, you and I have known each other for a long time. You know I'm not a very neutral fellow.

LAUER: No, that's true. So when you continued to talk about things like illegal immigration and the Birthers movement, did they come down, did they sit down with you in a meeting -- I'm talking about the brass at CNN -- did they threaten to take you off the air if you didn't toe the line?

DOBBS: Never. Never. In my almost, well just about 27 years with CNN, and I'm very fortunate to have been one of the folks who helped build the place, no one ever tried to interfere with my editorial judgment, for which I'm very grateful. But when you start moving to the issue of whether or not I was gonna be able to do analysis, to be able to express my opinion, which is something that, frankly, my audience has not only given me permission to do but demand-

LAUER: But they want you, seem to want you to do it.

DOBBS: Exactly.

LAUER: And, and you went on in an interview last night and you seemed to lead people to believe that when you were speaking out against President Bush and his immigration policies, you got much less kickback from CNN than when you started to speak out about the policies of Barack Obama. So, was this an issue that CNN wants to appear neutral but maintain a more liberal stance?

DOBBS: You know, I think that's a question left to others better.

LAUER: What do you think, though?

DOBBS: Well, my personal view is that, and all I can go by is what they said. They said the issue is one of advocacy, one of neutrality, that they will prefer, but we had this conversation now, and as it were, and not back then.

LAUER: You've had some critics over the last year or two...

DOBBS: No! Say it ain't so.

LAUER: I'll tell you it is true. Now some of them are cheering your exit as a victory.

DOBBS: Right.

LAUER: Roberto Lovato of Presente.org, it's a Hispanic group, said quote, "We're thrilled that Dobbs no longer has the legitimate platform from which to incite fear and hate." What's your reaction to that?

DOBBS: Well first, if by saying that I believe illegal immigrants are the only rational actors in this nation's illegal immigration crisis, then you know, forgive me. If saying that people should be absolutely honoring our borders and our ports as a sovereign nation, then forgive me. If saying that we should have a rational, effective and humane immigration policy in this country, but as a condition precedent, we have to secure our borders, then forgive me. I've said all along Matt, that there is one logical syllogism that, that I can't overcome. And if anybody can defeat that logic of the syllogism, then I'll sign up for whatever they want. I've said you cannot, you cannot substantively reform immigration law unless we can control immigration, and we can't control immigration if we don't control our own borders and ports. Now, if somebody can defeat the logic of that, I'll sign up for whatever they've got in mind.

LAUER: While we've got a sampling of your views on things. Let me ask you for your view-

DOBBS: Sure.

LAUER: -on Sarah Palin. She's everywhere right now. She's on her book tour. Is she staking out her claim, an early claim for the Republican nomination for 2012?

DOBBS: Well she's certainly the front-runner in terms of her popularity in the Republican Party, and therefore, de facto, it seems to me Matt, she is staking out her territory.

LAUER: Is, is she someone that if, if the election were held today, Lou, would you consider voting for her?

DOBBS: Would I consider voting for her? Frankly, based on from what I have seen personally, no. I'm an independent. I've got no dog in the, in the hunts of either the Democrats or the Republicans. But I think the woman had a brilliant address at the Republican Convention last year. I think that since then, she's, she's left a lot to be -- I'll put it this way -- desired as a person who is seeking votes. But that may be what this is about, campaigning for those votes like mine, that certainly are not persuaded at this point.

LAUER: You haven't been specific about your future plans. Safe to say, though, you're not gonna shy away from the public forum and, and continue to express your views on issues?

DOBBS: Absolutely safe, Matt. I'm going to, no matter whether, you know, I'm blessed with a lot of opportunities. No matter what it will be in the public arena, I guarantee you.

LAUER: We'll hear from Lou Dobbs. Lou, thanks for spending time with us this morning.

DOBBS: Great to be with you, Matt.

LAUER: Appreciate it.


—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/geoffrey-d ... vative-cnn

Thanks for posting transcript of Today Show interview, ShockedinCalifornia. I wasn't able to watch it.

You're welcome builditnow. There's no question that Lou isn't a brilliant man and a much needed voice in journalism and leadership today. Too bad for CNN that it didn't see examination and scrutiny of issues from a focused perspective important enough for them.

Thank you ShockedinCalifornia, I missed the interview, very interesting!

Thanks from here as well. I had no idea that he was on Today Show.

For his part Dobbs claimed the home of the very liberal Rick Sanchez "made it very clear, they wanted the network to go middle of the road and to be very neutral."

If true, what the hell is Rick Sanchez still doing there?

Originally Posted by NoBueno

For his part Dobbs claimed the home of the very liberal Rick Sanchez "made it very clear, they wanted the network to go middle of the road and to be very neutral."

If true, what the hell is Rick Sanchez still doing there?

Good question. I wish someone would watch Ricardo Sanchez's show, and every time he says anything liberal we all email CNN to remind them about their "Neutral" policy, and demand his removal. But that would mean someone would actually have to watch his show, or at least read a transcript........I'd rather watch infomercials.

Thanks for posting this interview which I didn't get the chance to watch either. Lou, go to Fox News!