Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Brian503a's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    California or ground zero of the invasion
    Posts
    16,029

    Bush-bashing on the rise within GOP

    http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincitie ... 854697.htm

    Posted on Sun, Feb. 12, 2006


    Bush-bashing on the rise within GOP

    BY DICK POLMAN
    Knight Ridder Newspapers

    WASHINGTON - Conservatives love to quote Ronald Reagan at every opportunity, to invoke him as the exemplar of their ideology. But in their winter of discontent, many on the right are breaching Reagan's 11th commandment, which decrees that no Republican shall ever speak ill of another.

    And the target of their ire is President Bush.

    At the dawn of a crucial election year - and with all the polls indicating that the Democrats are poised to make gains in the House and Senate - the Bush White House is banking on a big, enthusiastic conservative turnout in November. But that will happen only if the Bush base calls a halt to its Bush-bashing.

    The bashing has been quite intense in recent days. Commentator Jonah Goldberg, miffed that Bush has piled up record deficits and boosted the size of government, writes that Bush "is spending money like a pimp with a week to live." Another, Fox News analyst Tony Snow, says that Bush's decision to shelve his Social Security privatization plan is "an act of surrender." Yet another, former Reagan domestic-policy adviser Bruce Bartlett, is releasing a book this month titled "Impostor: How George W. Bush Bankrupted America and Betrayed the Reagan Legacy."

    The vibes here the other day at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference were particularly toxic. Normally, the thousands who attend spend most of their time trying to ensure that liberalism is a dirty word in American politics. This year was different.

    Bush was painted as another Bill Clinton (the ultimate insult) or Jimmy Carter (almost as bad), because he's pushing a downscaled domestic agenda - no Social Security plan, no tax-code overhaul this time - and because he wants to pump taxpayer money into alternative energy. Even Rick Perry, who succeeded Bush as governor of Texas, rebuked Bush for failing to secure the borders against illegal immigrants - thereby questioning Bush's national-security record: "How can we fight this (terrorist) war on foreign fronts, while leaving the front door to our nation vulnerable?"

    The ongoing influx of illegal immigrants, and the nation's porous border with Mexico, have become major grievances for the Bush base. The issue now threatens to undercut Bush's `06 strategy, which is to stump for a big November turnout by touting his war-on-terror credentials (an intended reprise of `02 and `04). Indeed, Republican strategist Marc Rotterman warned here that unless Bush gets tough on immigrants, "we risk alienating our conservative base and the `Reagan Democrats' who have helped us secure our electoral majority. ... Our conservative movement right now is at a crossroads."

    Mike Krempasky, a veteran activist and prominent conservative blogger, said, "I know so many people who care deeply about immigration. It has become increasingly frustrating for conservatives to see their leadership refusing to secure the borders. And how will this affect the army of election volunteers that Republicans normally rely on?"

    The immigration issue is especially sensitive because it threatens to split the Republican coalition, dividing the grassroots conservatives (the campaign workers) from the business lobby (the big donors). Within the grass roots, there is great hostility toward Bush's "guest worker" plan, which would allow illegal immigrants to stay in America for three years. Many conservatives dismiss that plan as a backdoor amnesty and an invitation to terrorist infiltration; Bush's big-business allies like the plan, because they see the illegals as cheap labor.

    The other day, that GOP fault line ruptured.

    It happened when Tom Tancredo showed up at the CPAC event. The scourge of illegal immigrants, he's a Colorado congressman who flaunts his rebel status. In 2002, he said that if terrorists struck America after slipping across the unsecured border, "the blood of the people killed will be on this administration" - a remark that (as Tancredo tells it) prompted Bush strategist Karl Rove to ring him up, chew him out, and call him a "traitor."

    Tancredo was the CPAC rock star. He triggered howls of appreciation when he said that, on immigration, "it is the president, not Tom Tancredo, who is out of step with his party." Then he took on the Bush guest-worker plan and said: "It is the employer community which sees profits from cheap labor, and the hell with the (impact on) the American taxpayer. The conservative movement can either be the voice of principle ... or it can be the voice of the Chamber of Commerce, but it cannot be both." More howls ensued.

    But Randel Johnson wasn't howling. A senior U.S. Chamber of Commerce official, he took the podium shortly thereafter, looking as if he'd just been punched in an alley.

    "Look," he said, "I'm a lifetime Republican, I worked in the Reagan administration, I worked on (Capitol) Hill when the Republicans took over in 1994. Immigration is a tough issue for some of us, like me, and we hate to see a split like this in the Republican Party." Thousands sat in silence, but he plowed on: "We in the business community provide millions of jobs, and all of a sudden, we become the bad guy in this debate." More silence. Bush's party could have problems in November unless these factions are in sync.

    Nor does harmony reign on other fronts. There's a big conservative faction that thinks Bush is wrong for believing he can bring peaceful democracy to Iraq and the rest of the Middle East (case in point: Palestinians have chosen Hamas). Columnist George Will said here that it's wrong to believe we can "subdue turbulent reality" and simply democratize "people in the world who do not share our values."

    There's a conservative faction that believes Bush is wrong to conduct warrantless surveillance of Americans; ex-Rep. Bob Barr, who led the early fight for Clinton's impeachment, suggested here that the Bush plan violated federal law and argued that "we can't allow our convictions to be dimmed or tarnished or confused by the fog of war."

    There's a big conservative faction that is alarmed about Jack Abramoff, the confessed felon who morphed from Republican activist to corrupt superlobbyist. They see Abramoff as a symbol of the special-interest establishment, and they want Bush to separate himself from that orbit and lead as a small-government outsider. Conservative book publisher Alfred Regnery, in remarks circulated at CPAC, said: "Instead of limply claiming that Democrats are just as crooked as they are, Republicans - and President Bush as well - need to remember why they were elected in the first place."

    And, maybe most importantly, there is an outcry over Bush's big spending and record deficits. Even Grover Norquist, one of the top conservative architects in Washington, points out that Bush's non-defense spending has outpaced Clinton's - and that this issue could demoralize conservatives on Election Day; in his words, "the troubles of 2005 could yet snowball to disastrous proportions in 2006."

    The upside for Republicans, however, is that political moods shift quickly in a 24/7 culture. By November, fear of terrorism might still be the glue that bonds conservatives to Bush. Fear of Hillary Rodham Clinton apparently is another potential uniter; the frequent invocation of her name worked wonders, albeit temporarily, at the CPAC event (especially the jokes at her expense, including this one offered at the podium: "She has already thrown her broom into the ring.")

    And, above all, disdain for the Democrats might still be the tonic. Craig Shirley, a longtime conservative strategist, offered the sunny scenario: "The left always goes too far, and that could inflame the right to get out and vote. Conservatives do have problems with the administration. But Bush is their president. He's family. And when people outside the family say vile things about him, we circle the wagons. We like to take care of our own."
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,032
    And, above all, disdain for the Democrats might still be the tonic. Craig Shirley, a longtime conservative strategist, offered the sunny scenario: "The left always goes too far, and that could inflame the right to get out and vote. Conservatives do have problems with the administration. But Bush is their president. He's family. And when people outside the family say vile things about him, we circle the wagons. We like to take care of our own."
    _________________
    They're obviously not counting the thousands who have disowned Bush.

    Three cheers for Tancredo!!! Rah Rah Rah

    Three cheers for Bob Barr!!! Rah Rah Rah

    RR
    The men who try to do something and fail are infinitely better than those who try to do nothing and succeed. " - Lloyd Jones

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •