Thread: Border Patrol Wants More Women To Join Its Ranks

By Jude Joffe-Block
December 03, 2014

PHOENIX - A new job posting to fill U.S. Border Patrol agent positions along the Southwest border is exclusively open to female applicants.

“Customs and Border Protection has a critical need for female Border Patrol Agents for the screening of female detainees who enter the United States,” reads the job post. "Male applicants will not be considered."

Spokeswoman Agent Shevannah Wray said one factor driving female recruitment is the growing number of female migrants crossing the Southwest border.

She said apprehensions of women have jumped 173 percent since 2011 and female agents are needed to search these female migrants when they are arrested.

Plus, Wray said the number of women in the Border Patrol lags behind other federal law enforcement agencies.

When Wray joined the agency four years ago, she was one of just two women in her class of 50.

“We have the same requirements as the men have and we have to pass the same benchmarks that the men have to pass,” Wray said. “So we are the same and we can all do the same position.”

Wray said the agency is looking for candidates who are physically fit, demonstrate integrity and critical thinking and enjoy the outdoors.

She said the agency expects to hire 1,600 agents of both genders over the course of this fiscal year.

http://www.fronterasdesk.org/content...join-its-ranks

What?! Why are you searching them in such a way as to need female agents? Oh my God, they're doing cavity searches on illegal aliens whom they want to give amnesty. This just proves way beyond adequate measure that our government has become wicked and perverse.

We are now living in Babylon. Soon, transgenders will be promoted based on the color of their eye mascara and the size of their sexual organs.

Perversely, and politically correctly related - the mindset that will destroy our military from within and our society as a whole.

-------------------------

Con: Transgender policy defies common sense

• Article by: JOHN D. HAGEN JR.
• Updated: December 3, 2014 - 6:05 PM

Lawsuits could allow boys to play on girls’ teams on demand.

It’s a matter of common sense that putting boys in a girls’ locker room would create confusion, anxiety and discomfort. It’s a matter of common sense that boys, with their greater muscle mass, should not be allowed to compete on girls’ athletic teams. Those norms are self-evident to an overwhelming majority of the public.
On Thursday, the Minnesota State High School League (MSHSL) will vote on abolishing those norms of common sense. A pending policy would end the traditional rule of dividing athletes by biological gender. Instead, it would grant boys with a “deeply felt internal sense” of being female the right to compete on girls’ teams.
The policy is meant to look as if it gives schools a measure of discretion. But it contains a clause that any capable lawyer can drive a truck through. It virtually guarantees that any school denying a boy the right to compete as a girl will face a lawsuit.
The policy calls for schools to review particular matters (for example, statements from parents and teachers). Then it states: “When there is confirmation of a student’s consistent and uniform gender-related identity or any other evidence that the gender-related identity is sincerely held as part of the person’s core identity, the student will be eligible” to play on his team of choice (emphasis added).
Any lawyer can tell you that such language generates lawsuits. The disjunctive “or,” the boundless “any other evidence” and the mandatory “will be eligible” are potent grounds for a claim. The clause would grant boys a right to play as girls virtually on demand.
Imagine the following scenario. An adolescent counterpart of Clay Matthews (the very long-haired, very burly linebacker for the Green Bay Packers) comes before your school board. He declares: “I always have had a feminine self-image. I never told anyone, because of society’s expectations, but I’m revealing it now. My long hair is evidence of my sincerity and my feminine self-expression.”
The High School League’s pending policy would compel the school to let this boy play power forward on the girls’ basketball team, regardless of safety considerations. (Imagine a Clay Matthews look-alike bowling girls over under the basket.) If the school resisted, it would promptly be faced with a lawsuit under the “will be eligible” clause.
The language isn’t inadvertent. The pending policy is a redraft. The public challenged an original rendition early this fall, when some 10,000 e-mails were sent to the league.
The redraft supposedly was to be prepared by a “task force” representing multiple viewpoints on the issue. But opponents of the original draft (the Minnesota Catholic Conference, the Minnesota Family Council and other groups) have been shut out of the process. The redraft, with its insidious language, was prepared by transgender activists and the bureaucracy of the league.
The transgender issue should be resolved by the Legislature, not by the league. The common sense of the public can have an adequate hearing there, as a counterweight to activist ideology. The implications of policy language can be critically assessed, and insidious clauses can be cut out.
High schoolers with gender-identity dysphoria should be treated with sensitivity. But no one should have carte blanche to disrupt athletic programs and potentially to endanger other students. Nor should activist lawyers be armed with a gender-change-on-demand manifesto with which to intimidate school districts.
The transgender policy defies common sense, and the public shouldn’t stand for it. The norm of dividing athletes by biological gender should be upheld. If the league adopts the pending policy, the public should insist that the Legislature reinstate common-sense norms.

http://www.startribune.com/opinion/c...284678481.html

I doubt you'll see a rush of 'educated' females rushing the BP recruiters. They will go for the dumb ones (e.g., completely uninformed and totally naive).

Risk of Deadly TB Exposure Grows Along U.S.-Mexico Border

TIJUANA, Mexico—He was like many people in their early 20s, at least the type with spiky black hair and two lip rings. Four years ago, while living in this teeming border city, Gonzalo Garcia says he spent free time in the U.S., to shop, meet girls, and "hang out." He had no idea he was developing a potentially deadly form of tuberculosis.
Exactly how long he had it will never be known. He says he started losing weight and becoming tired and tried to get help. But it took a year before a doctor finally figured...


U.S. govt: Foreigners with risk of Ebola are safe to cross the ...

Oct 6, 2014 - U.S. govt: Foreigners with risk of Ebola are safe to cross the border, but ... Across the board, children who are unvaccinated against diseases that don't even exist in .... He has also exposed "strange fibers" found in Chicken McNuggets, fake ...

But all the logic gets reversed when it comes to ebola and the U.S. southern border. Suddenly, anyone who says the border should be controlled so that ebola-infected illegal immigrants can't enter the United States are called "alarmists" or "racists." Apparently, the idea that an ebola-infected illegal alien might expose others to ebola is now politically incorrect.

Never mind the fact that border agents are catching border crossers who recently came from ebola-infected countries. As reported by Top Right News: [1]

It may be since there is no plan or intent to secure America's borders, and our enemies tend to use females and children as body bombers that they re doing this in anticipation of those types of "illegal immigrant."