Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
05-11-2005, 08:26 AM #1
CA congressman Dreier leads "Real SSN card act of 2005&
http://www.etopiamedia.net/empnn/pages/ ... 51212.html
Following Congressional passage of the REAL ID Act of 2005, Congressman Dreier of California leads the fight for H.R. 98, the "REAL Social Security Card Act of 2005"
American Politics Today #16
Washington, D.C.
May 10, 2005
By Marc Strassman
Reporter
Disregarding complaints from civil libertarians that it was an anti-undocumented-immigrant measure, from security experts that it would decrease national and homeland security, and from governors and state legislatures that it was "a massive unfunded federal mandate," the U.S. Senate today unanimously approved a supplemental appropriations conference report containing the REAL ID Act of 2005, legislation that would, among other things, bar undocumented immigrants from legally obtaining a state driver's license.
As the REAL ID Act of 2005 headed down Pennsylvania Avenue to the White House for President George W. Bush's signature, the House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Wisconsin Republican F. James Sensenbrenner, the driving force behind the REAL ID Act of 2005, announced that it would be holding hearings on H.R. 98, the so-called Bonner Plan, a bill sponsored by California Congressman David Dreier that would require machine-readable Social Security cards and create an integrated "Employment Eligibility Database" indicating who is, and who isn't, legally entitled to work in the United States.
Machine-readable Social Security cards
This bill requires that "each Social Security card issued under this subparagraph shall include an encrypted machine-readable electronic identification strip which shall be unique to the individual to whom the card is issued."
Not a "national identification card"
Section 11(b) of H.R. 98, headed "No National Identification Card," states that "It is the policy of the United States that the Social Security card shall not be used as a national identification card."
Fifty million dollars to "combat illegal border crossings into the United States"
Section 7 of H.R. 98 authorizes the appropriation of "$10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 through 2010" for purposes of making "grants for the purpose of improving and developing new technologies to combat illegal border crossings into the United States."
Integration of Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) fingerprint databases
Section 9 of H.R. 98 would "integrate the fingerprint database maintained by the Department of Homeland Security with the fingerprint database maintained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation," this integration to "be completed not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act."
Prohibition against hiring those not on the "Employment Eligibility Database"
H.R. 98 prohibits the hiring of any individual who has not secured for himself or herself a machine readable Social Security card and presented it to his or her prospective employer. All employers are prohibited from hiring anyone without such a card and must verify the identity of the prospective employee using the federal "Employment Eligibility Database." Employers who mistakenly violate the provisions of this law in good faith "shall not be liable for hiring an unauthorized alien" if he or she "terminates that employment of the alien upon being informed of the error."
$50,000 fine plus costs of "removing" the illegally-hired employee for each violation
Under the terms of H.R. 98, to ensure compliance with these provisions, "The Secretary of Homeland Security may assess a penalty, payable to the Secretary, against any employer who (i) hires an individual for employment in the United States in any capacity who is known by the employer not to be authorized to work in the United States in such capacity; or (ii) fails to comply with the procedures prescribed by the Secretary pursuant to this section in connection with the employment of any individual….Such penalty shall not exceed $50,000 for each occurrence of a violation described in subparagraph (A) with respect to the individual, plus, in the event of the removal of such individual from the United States based on findings developed in connection with the assessment or collection of such penalty, the costs incurred by the Federal Government, cooperating State and local governments, and State and local law enforcement agencies, in connection with such removal."
And up to 5 years in prison
Anyone in violation of these requirements may also be sentenced to up to five years in prison.
The hearings
The Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims of the House Judiciary Committee hearing on the Bonner Plan, officially called the "Illegal Immigration Enforcement and Social Security Protection Act of 2005", H.R. 98, will take place on Thursday, May 12, 2005, 2:00 p.m. ET in Room 2141 of the Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC
-
05-11-2005, 10:41 AM #2
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- NJ
- Posts
- 12,855
Don't we ALREADY HAVE A LAW against HIRING ILLEGALS?
Why do we need another law Isn't it possible to ENFORCE the existing law???? This is where they work to confuse...they seem to be working at it OVERTIMEJoin our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
05-11-2005, 10:58 AM #3
Gee, I thought the real ID act was supposed to take care of that?
Employers who mistakenly violate the provisions of this law in good faith "shall not be liable for hiring an unauthorized alien" if he or she "terminates that employment of the alien upon being informed of the error."I stay current on Americans for Legal Immigration PAC's fight to Secure Our Border and Send Illegals Home via E-mail Alerts (CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP)
-
05-11-2005, 11:08 AM #4
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- NJ
- Posts
- 12,855
I wonder how the good Congressman would react if we had MASS PHONE CALLING into his office asking for an explanation as to the reason he wants to add yet ANOTHER REDUNDANT LAW and why weren't the existing laws ENFORCED?
This could be a very beneficial "experiment."Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
Border Patrol union says Biden is flying in migrants so 'border...
03-28-2024, 06:25 PM in illegal immigration News Stories & Reports