Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443

    CA: Lawmakers split over whether to count illegal immigrants

    Lawmakers split over whether to count illegal immigrants in Census



    10:00 PM PST on Sunday, December 27, 2009

    By BEN GOAD
    Washington Bureau

    WASHINGTON - The approach of next year's national population survey is rekindling a longstanding debate over whether to count undocumented immigrants.

    Inland Southern California's congressional delegation is divided on the issue, which holds huge fiscal and political implications for California.

    The question re-emerged early last month in the Senate, where Sens. Davis Vitter, R-La, and Robert Bennett, R-Utah, offered a measure requiring people responding to the 2010 census to state whether they are American citizens. Their aim: to ensure illegal immigrants are not included in the data that governs the apportionment of congressional districts and the distribution of federal funding.

    The amendment was defeated, but the idea found some supporters in both chambers of Congress.

    "The law is the law and illegal immigrants should not be counted in the U.S. census because they are not U.S. citizens or legal residents," said Rep. Ken Calvert, R-Corona.

    Such sentiments have raised concerns among some pro-immigrant and Hispanic advocacy groups that are bracing for similar attempts in the House or Senate as the census draws closer.

    "We saw this as a definite effort to suppress the Latino count," said Rosalind Gold, senior director of policy, research and advocacy for the National Association of Latino Elected Officials. "We really have to be vigilant because we're concerned that this issue is not going to go away."

    Under the Constitution, the 435 seats in the House of Representatives are reapportioned each 10 years by "counting the whole number of persons in each state." Thus, excluding illegal immigrants from the census would be a violation, Gold said.

    Beyond that, the data is used to refine the formulas used by the federal government for distributing billions of dollars annually for items such as education, transportation and health care assistance, she noted.

    "Census data is what's used to determine how we're going to make critical decisions about planning public services: Where do we put roads? Where do we put schools? Where do we put hospitals?" Gold said. "All of that gets determined by census data."

    Inland views vary

    Seeking to counter the Vitter-Bennett measure and any similar legislation forthcoming in the House, Rep. Joe Baca introduced his own bill that would reinforce the language in the Constitution and eliminate the use of any census questions pertaining to citizenship or immigration status.

    Anything short of a full count of people in California would deny the cash-strapped state much-needed federal funding, said Baca, D-Rialto. Already, California is facing a budget gap in excess of $20 billion. Whether or not undocumented immigrants are counted, "the cost and the burden will still be on the states to provide public services," he said.

    Rep. Jerry Lewis, R-Redlands, also favors the inclusion of illegal immigrants in the process, according to his spokesman, Jim Specht.

    "Congressman Lewis believes if we don't count people in the census, we wouldn't know who they are, where they are and how to deal with them," Specht said. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Vista, supports the inclusion of the undocumented for the purposes of apportioning representatives to states, yet he believes they should be left out of redistricting, the process that determines the boundaries of congressional districts, Issa spokesman Frederick Hill said.

    That way, federal funding levels would reflect the total number of people in each state, but congressional representation within each state would be divided up based on the population of legal residents.

    The Southern California-based Latino Elected Officials Association would oppose that idea, Gold said.

    "Our nation has consistently counted people, even if they did not have the right to vote," she said, pointing to children and women who were not allowed to vote before suffrage.

    "The idea behind a complete census count is to provide representation that is fair to everybody who is living here."

    Political implications

    Recent studies show population growth in California has slowed significantly, especially compared to other states.

    Thus, without the inclusion of all residents in the count, the Golden State could lose a measure of political clout over the next decade, Gold said.

    "If we don't have a full count in California, we could indeed lose a congressional seat," she said. "It could be more, but we think there is a serious concern about California losing at least one."

    Meanwhile, states with fewer undocumented immigrants would stand to gain seats.

    Still, Calvert said counting people who are in the country illegally outweighs the potential benefit to California if they are included.

    "While certain state representation may be disproportionately impacted by not counting illegal immigrants, such as Texas, Florida, New York and California, we cannot undermine the rule of law by giving illegal immigrants an undeserved status through the census," Calvert said.

    www.pe.com
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member agrneydgrl's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,760
    Good ole Joe BACCA. Does the last name tell you anything?

  3. #3
    Senior Member azwreath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,621
    "We saw this as a definite effort to suppress the Latino count," said Rosalind Gold, senior director of policy, research and advocacy for the National Association of Latino Elected Officials. "We really have to be vigilant because we're concerned that this issue is not going to go away."



    Suppress the latino count? More accurately what she means is that they don't want the suppression of taxpayer funds to support millions of illegal aliens or doled out to their special interests. And God forbid, the treasonous politicians working in the best interests of foreign nationals and governments are suppressed in their efforts.

    And she's damned right this issue isn't going to go away. Neither are the American people.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member Dixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas - Occupied State - The Front Line
    Posts
    35,072
    Oh... I want them counted and I want them segregated. I want every last one of them counted because I want to know how many of them are in the US. I want the historical immigration status questions asked of everyone. Where were you born... Are you a naturalized alien... Are you a US Citizen/Immigrant... I want the immigration status of everyone to be very clear.

    The illegals should not be used to gerrymander voting districts. If they are counted in the general population, that is exactly what will happen.

    Dixie
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5
    Senior Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    5,262
    agrneydgrl said

    Good ole Joe BACCA. Does the last name tell you anything?
    The answer to that should actually be no we do not know just because someoe is Latino does not indicate partiality to illegals.
    I support enforcement and see its lack as bad for the 3rd World as well. Remittances are now mostly spent on consumption not production assets. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  6. #6
    Senior Member ReggieMay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    5,527
    And if not counting illegals will result in fewer congressional seats and/or funds from the government, that just might be a very good thing. Counting illegals in order to get more government representation and goodies encourages sanctuary cities/states by rewarding them for their actions. Punish them and maybe they won't be so welcoming.
    "A Nation of sheep will beget a government of Wolves" -Edward R. Murrow

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  7. #7
    Senior Member azwreath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,621
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard
    agrneydgrl said

    Good ole Joe BACCA. Does the last name tell you anything?
    The answer to that should actually be no we do not know just because someoe is Latino does not indicate partiality to illegals.[/quote]




    I thought she was commenting on his last name carrying the same pronunciation as "cow" in spanish........
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  8. #8
    Senior Member Ratbstard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Alien City-(formerly New York City)
    Posts
    12,611
    Quote Originally Posted by azwreath
    I thought she was commenting on his last name carrying the same pronunciation as "cow" in spanish........
    "Holy Bacca", I didn't know that.


    If IAs are counted they should also be identified as IAs PERIOD.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  9. #9
    Senior Member azwreath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,621
    Quote Originally Posted by Ratbstard
    Quote Originally Posted by azwreath
    I thought she was commenting on his last name carrying the same pronunciation as "cow" in spanish........




    "Holy Bacca", I didn't know that.








    Vaca = cow

    V in spanish sounds like a b. On the other hand....go figure....b sounds like a v. Maybe explains why they are so confused as to just what side of the border illegal aliens and the Mexican military belong on but I digress......

    Either way, there ya have it...Joe Cow. Or, it's probably more like he's shortened it from something like "dela vaca" which means 'of the cow"....presumably referencing a family business and not his mother.

    Or, as my husband says "Joe of the cows***".....but, I think he can probably get away with that since he's of spanish descent
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  10. #10
    Senior Member ShockedinCalifornia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,901
    Oh... I want them counted and I want them segregated. I want every last one of them counted because I want to know how many of them are in the US. I want the historical immigration status questions asked of everyone. Where were you born... Are you a naturalized alien... Are you a US Citizen/Immigrant... I want the immigration status of everyone to be very clear.
    Me too Dixie. These are MUST ASK questions for any true statistical accounting of US Census figures. We MUST KNOW HOW MANY ARE HERE.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •