Results 1 to 3 of 3
Like Tree3Likes

Thread: King To Illegal Aliens Hopeful For Amnesty: “We Have A Bus For You To Tijuana”

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member HAPPY2BME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    17,895

    King To Illegal Aliens Hopeful For Amnesty: “We Have A Bus For You To Tijuana”

    Mr. Conservative
    Robert Rich
    April 4, 2014

    As soon as they raise their hand and say, ‘I’m unlawfully present in the United States,’ we’re not going take your oath into the military, but we’re going to take your deposition and we have a bus for you to Tijuana,” King reacted to the proposal. “That’s the law.”
    Congressman King To Illegal Aliens Hopeful For Amnesty: “We Have A Bus For You To Tijuana”

    As the debate on amnesty continues, it appears as though emotions are beginning to rise as the discussion resurfaces. Speaking about the proposed military-citizenship exchange, Congressman Steve King stated that the only place they’ll be going, is back home.

    There has been much debate regarding the potential flaws in giving amnesty to the countless illegal aliens in our nation. Furthermore, the talks of amnesty surely has attributed to a rise in those hopping the border as they hope to get here before any citizenship is granted.

    (See also: Republican Congressman Caught In A Lie: Says He Supports Amnesty For Illegal Aliens)


    Recently speaking about suggestions put forward by Democratic politicians in which they offer illegal aliens the chance to earn their citizenship through a bout of military service, King had little nice words to speak of the matter.

    Rep. Jeff Denham has proposed, what he is calling, the ENLIST Act that, in essence, will allow certain illegal aliens to lawfully serve in our military. Aliens who illegally gained into the country before the age of 15, would be allowed to serve – at the end of their stunt, they would be rewarded with full citizenship.

    “As soon as they raise their hand and say, ‘I’m unlawfully present in the United States,’ we’re not going take your oath into the military, but we’re going to take your deposition and we have a bus for you to Tijuana,” King reacted to the proposal. “That’s the law.”

    Of course certain Liberal counterparts, such as Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, aren’t so happy with the Congressman’s remarks. In a highly illogical rant, Schultz shared, “This rhetoric is insulting, unacceptable and harmful. These most recent comments by my Republican colleagues are a new low in Republicans’ attempts to insult Hispanics and the immigrant community and derail immigration reform.”



    Yet when Republican’s challenged Obamacare, they were told that it’s the law and to deal with it. The double-standards from the left are tiring, and the hypocrisy nearly unbearable.

    As the left is fighting to include the ENLIST Act in the National Defense Authorization Act, King relayed that he simply, “can’t let something like this happen.”

    Explaining his logic, he shared, “If we’re going to put out the bait, which is: come into the U.S., break in, so to speak, smuggle yourself into the military, put on the uniform of the United States, take an oath to uphold our Constitution, which may or may not mean anything to them, and now we’re going to reward you with citizenship — I think it’s just a bizarre thing to do, to reward people for breaking our laws. That’s what amnesty is.”

    Louie Gohmert and Mo Brooks further expressed to Breitbart their discontent in the suggestion of illegal’s serving in our military. Asking how they can be expected to uphold an oath and the United States Constitution when they’re already breaking the law, Brooks further inquired:
    “How do you ensure that illegal aliens are loyal to America and not another country? Is it wise to entrust illegal aliens with questionable loyalties with America’s military secrets and weapons, including weapons of mass destruction?”

    Sounds to me to be a valid argument, but what do you think? Let us know in a comment below.

    http://www.mrconservative.com/2014/0...ou-to-tijuana/
    Join our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & to secure US borders by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member Kiara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    2,393
    In a highly illogical rant, Schultz shared, “This rhetoric is insulting, unacceptable and harmful. These most recent comments by my Republican colleagues are a new low in Republicans’ attempts to insult Hispanics and the immigrant community and derail immigration reform.”
    It is 'unacceptable' for illegals to be here period, never mind being catered to on any level. It is 'harmful' for citizens to have illegals here and magically making an illegal a citizen isn't going to improve anything.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,201
    With all of intentional lying by misusing words and the language, e.g. just about the entire news media absolutely refuses to label illegal aliens -- "illegal aliens." They persist in calling these foreigner squatters "immigrants" even when it makes a "news" story confusing to read. Which is probably their intent, to erase the distinction between legal immigrants and foreigner squatters, and make the reader think that real legal immigrants are being treated unfairly by the government. Just about every news story I see posted uses the "immigrant" euphemism for illegal aliens. I am really tired of this lying by euphemism and dishonesty in the use of words.

    With that in mind, we need to give politicians no language camouflage to hide behind. We must demand they say precisely this: "Illegal aliens must go home. They do not belong here, they should never have been here in the first place, they MUST GO HOME." Any politician who refuses to talk in clear honest language must, should, be rejected and given bloody hell for his obfuscation. Like for instance Rand Paul. By his words and actions, he is clearly in favor of amnesty but he refuses to honestly admit it in public.

    We also need to remind the uninformed voter of this lying by distorting the language. To reveal this type of lying, should go a long way to neutralize the open borders lobby's propaganda. Nobody likes someone who will not be honest with him especially when it is intended to manipulate him.

    God bless Congressman Steven King for his frank, honest and no nonsense opposition against giving privileged treatment to foreign squatters, people who should not be here in the first place. Notice how unequivocal and simple his statements are. Compare that with 99% of the politicians out there.

    Patriots keep it simple, "Why are we debating about giving privileges, protections and benefits for foreign squatters who do not belong here?" No borders, no country. No deportations, no country. Illegal Aliens, GO HOME! American jobs for Americans.
    Last edited by csarbww; 04-06-2014 at 02:36 PM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •