Results 1 to 2 of 2
Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By Jean

Thread: Centrist House Dems Donít Sign Brief in Support of Obama Exec Amnesty

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006

    Centrist House Dems Donít Sign Brief in Support of Obama Exec Amnesty

    by Breitbart News
    6 Apr 2015

    On Monday, 12 centrist House Democrats–including an Oregon Democrat who declared that amnesty for illegal immigrants is the new civil rights movement and will determine who controls the country for the next 30 years–refused to sign an amicus brief in support of President Barack Obama’s executive amnesty, revealing that voters in their districts may not be as supportive of granting amnesty to illegal immigrants as national Democrats.
    According to The Hill, 181 House Democrats signed the brief, which argues that “Congress has vested the Secretary of Homeland Security with broad discretion to determine how best to implement the immigration laws, including the particular decisions embodied in the Deferred Action Memorandum.”
    But 12 Democrats, including Rep. Kurt Schrader (D-OR), did not. Schrader’s refusal to do so is indeed curious given that he declared at a pro-amnesty rally in February that the amnesty movement is the new civil rights movement and “probably the biggest issue of the 21st century.”
    “It will decide who is in charge of this country for the next 20 or 30 years,” he said.
    The Hill noted that the 12 Democrats who did not sign the brief “are mostly centrists and members who will face tough reelection races next year.” They include: Reps. Brad Ashford (NE), Jim Cooper (TN), Henry Cuellar (TX), Gwen Graham (FL), Rick Larsen (WA), Dan Lipinski (IL), Stephen Lynch (MA), Collin Peterson (MN), Schrader (OR), Kyrsten Sinema (AZ), Peter Visclosky (IN), and Tim Walz (MN).
    The Obama administration has appealed a federal judge’s injunction that temporarily halted its executive amnesty program. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has decided to hear oral arguments in the case later this month.
    During the 2014 midterm election cycle, vulnerable Senate Democrats from red states begged Obama to delay his executive amnesty until after the election to improve their chances of retaining their Senate seats. Though Obama did wait until after the election to announce his executive amnesty, Republicans gained control of the Senate and took back Congress largely because the electorate, according to exit polling, disapproved of Obama’s executive amnesty for illegal immigrants.
    Judy and Mayday like this.
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Temporary good news? But this change of heart does not mean that they have stepped into the sunlight, but they are interested in re-election, and that they probably do not deserve!

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-01-2015, 05:25 PM
  2. Senate Dems Offer Obama Support on Executive Amnesty
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-18-2014, 12:53 AM
  3. Report: Exec Amnesty 'No Matter How Big a Shellacking' For Dems
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-05-2014, 04:12 PM
  4. Senate Dems Vote to Authorize Obama Exec Amnesty, Side with Masters of Universe over
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-21-2014, 08:40 PM
  5. Vulnerable Sen. Dems Urging Indefinite Delay on Exec Amnesty
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-12-2014, 05:13 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts