Thread: CO: Longmont mother convicted of using false social security

Originally Posted by 93camaro

Jaquez-Quiroz came to the United States with family members in 2000 and then became pregnant. She testified on Tuesday -- choking back tears -- that her son, who is an American citizen, has been sent to Mexico to live with family. Had he stayed here, Connell said, social services would have taken him.

So you sent a baby to MEXICO over social services?

Social Services probably would have been the best thing to ever happen for the child, over Mexico.

If Social Services had gotten the child, mami would no longer be getting the welfare checks for him. That's probably why she sent him to mexico. Do the checks follow?

Originally Posted by miguelina

If Social Services had gotten the child, mami would no longer be getting the welfare checks for him. That's probably why she sent him to mexico. Do the checks follow?

Please, Please some one prove that this isn't possible!

Originally Posted by Justthatguy

Please take note that Jaquez-Quiroz was violating state felony laws and even if Obama signed an amnesty bill it wouldn't have helped her. She would still have to be deported. That's because a President doesn't have the authority to grant amnesty for violating state laws. There probably isn't a single illegal that hasn't violated a state I D law which are felonies.
What happened in 1986? At that time I believe there weren't any state laws making it a felony to use forged, stolen, altered etc. I D.'s. That's how they slipped through the system the last time. There might have been one or two states that did have laws making it a felony but it was ignored. This time around we have to make sure state laws are enforced.

Trouble is, the darn presidents we've been getting think they are above the law. And they don't have to follow protocols, or regulations of the Constitution. It's been end-run on so many times, it may as well have put through the shredder.

Originally Posted by miguelina

Originally Posted by 93camaro

Jaquez-Quiroz came to the United States with family members in 2000 and then became pregnant. She testified on Tuesday -- choking back tears -- that her son, who is an American citizen, has been sent to Mexico to live with family. Had he stayed here, Connell said, social services would have taken him.

So you sent a baby to MEXICO over social services?

Social Services probably would have been the best thing to ever happen for the child, over Mexico.

If Social Services had gotten the child, mami would no longer be getting the welfare checks for him. That's probably why she sent him to mexico. Do the checks follow?

That's a question I have been asking for long time M! Knowing this corrupt government and their affinity for illegals, my guess would be those checks follow!