Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
05-06-2008, 11:59 AM #1
U.S. May Punish Nations That Refuse Their Ex-Cons
Congress considers denying visas, cutting aid until countries take their citizens back.
By Eunice Moscoso
WASHINGTON BUREAU
Tuesday, May 06, 2008
WASHINGTON — The United States is facing a major obstacle in its efforts to deport thousands of illegal immigrants, including many convicted felons: Their home countries don't want them back.
This does not sit well with Sen. Arlen Specter, a veteran Republican lawmaker and ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Specter was stunned at the situation after touring several prisons in his home state of Pennsylvania, where taxpayer dollars are paying to house foreigners who have served their sentences but could not be deported. In response, he drafted legislation that would punish countries that refuse to take back illegal immigrants.
"There is an enormous problem of public safety, which is slightly under the radar screen," Specter said.
He noted that once convicted felons serve their sentences in the U.S., they can be held for only six months before they are released into the general public.
Specter's measure was recently introduced in the Senate and the House.
The proposed legislation would require the Department of Homeland Security to report to Congress every 90 days on the countries that refuse repatriation. Those nations would automatically be denied all immigrant visas until they take their citizens back. The measure would also deny certain foreign aid to the countries.
As of February, at least eight countries were refusing to take back 139,000 illegal immigrants the U.S. has ordered deported, according to Specter's office: Vietnam, Jamaica, China, India, Ethiopia, Laos, Eritrea and Iran. They include 18,000 convicted felons.
Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said he supports the idea of punishing nations that refuse to take back illegal immigrants but has not read the specifics of Specter's legislation.
NOTE:
I find it offensive that Mexico and Central American were NOT included in this list....I call on you in the name of Liberty, of patriotism & everything dear to the American character, to come to our aid...
William Barret Travis
Letter From The Alamo Feb 24, 1836
-
05-06-2008, 12:04 PM #2
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Oregon (pronounced "ore-ee-gun")
- Posts
- 8,464
This:
Those nations would automatically be denied all immigrant visas until they take their citizens back. The measure would also deny certain foreign aid to the countries.Those nations would automatically be denied all immigrant and work visas until they take their citizens back. The measure would also deny certain foreign aid to the countries.Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
05-06-2008, 12:15 PM #3
Well thank goodness Congress is doing SOMETHING!
So are Mexico and Central America taking their prisioners back? Is this why they are not on the list?If Palestine puts down their guns, there will be peace.
If Israel puts down their guns there will be no more Israel.
Dick Morris
-
05-06-2008, 12:21 PM #4
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Oregon (pronounced "ore-ee-gun")
- Posts
- 8,464
WorriedAmerican - Not so much really. They are not listed because they are (relatively speaking) not a big part of the problem.
Big countries (with big populations) are the ones more likely to be identified as part of the problem. {I'm editing in a better explanation than the one I added a few minutes ago initially}
[Old: Hence, India and China (whose large populations produce large groups of IAs [to us], and a certain % of those end up doing crime here).]
[New: There is both a strong reluctance for large countries to add more people into their already very large populations - knowing that these are criminals to boot - AND, that both nations have strong economic leverage in negotiating the outcome as well. The size of the populations is sort of important, but not the main factor really]
Other cases like the relatively smaller countries as Iran, Vietnam, etc. have a different set of issues associated with their unwillingness to repatriate their deported nationals. These typically have more problems in the area of pure diplomatic relations, protocols for doing the logistics, etc. involved with the process.
The other group, is sort of a hodge-podge mix of various situations but are usually much smaller countries that are not as large a contributor to the overall problem (Eritrea, Jamaica, Laos, etc)Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
05-06-2008, 01:53 PM #5
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- TEXAS - The Lone Star State
- Posts
- 16,941
here we go again. another law to replace the SAME LAW already on the book.
blame the state department for not acting on this and letting anyone do anything.
CHINA for years has refused their citizens in this country who have been jajiled adn thus have been released onto the streets of America
-
05-06-2008, 05:38 PM #6Big countries (with big populations) are the ones more likely to be identified as part of the problem.If Palestine puts down their guns, there will be peace.
If Israel puts down their guns there will be no more Israel.
Dick Morris
-
05-06-2008, 07:41 PM #7
I would still deport them. They are their nationals they are responsible for them.
Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
05-07-2008, 12:05 PM #8Originally Posted by CCUSAIf Palestine puts down their guns, there will be peace.
If Israel puts down their guns there will be no more Israel.
Dick Morris
Listen to William Gheen on Rense Apr 17, 2024 talking NEW Tool...
04-18-2024, 06:17 PM in ALIPAC In The News