Thread: Court to decide fate of illegal aliens’ son (anchor baby)

Court to decide fate of illegal immigrant's son

A U.S. citizen, he could be sent to Guatemala or be allowed to stay

LAWRENCEVILLE, Ga. - His mother isn't in the picture. His illegal immigrant father was deported.

Now, the 13-year-old waits for a Georgia court to decide his fate. Among the options: keeping the boy in the only country he's ever lived in, but as a ward of the state, or sending him to his father in Guatemala, a country he's never seen.

It's a tangled case that defies easy solutions. The boy is a U.S. citizen and says he wants to stay in his native country. His father, a bus driver without regular work, says he would gladly take his child — though he agrees the boy would be better off in the U.S.

But the teen has a history of behavioral problems, which make him hard to place with a foster family. His older brother, who is 16, lives with relatives in the U.S. But they have other children and are unable to care for the boy because of his problems.

A lawyer hired to represent the boy's interests says the state appears to be looking for a way to send him to Guatemala against his wishes, a move she likened to deportation.

Beatriz Illescas Putzeys, Guatemala's consul general in Atlanta, said she usually argues for family reunification, but in this case she is prepared to argue that the boy should stay here because he is a U.S. citizen and would have access to better education and counseling.

"It is highly unusual, totally unusual," Illescas Putzeys said. "What I have been dealing with most of the time is trying to get children sent back to Guatemala to their families."

The boy was born in Los Angeles in December 1995 to illegal immigrants — a father from Guatemala and a mother from El Salvador. His mother later abandoned the family and her whereabouts are unknown, according to Rebeca Salmon, a lawyer hired by the boy's court-appointed guardian. The boy's father, Edgar Ovidio Juares, 40, was arrested in June 2007 and deported to Guatemala last year, he told a lawyer in Guatemala.

Father's mixed feelings
In a recent phone interview with The Associated Press, Juares was conflicted about his son's fate. He said he wanted to have his son in Guatemala with him, but acknowledged the boy's quality of life would be better in the U.S.

"I don't want to lose contact with my son," he said, speaking in a mix of Spanish and English. "I want him here, but here it is hard to help him with the problems he has because we don't have much money.

"He said to me he doesn't want to come here," Juares said.

Salmon asked the AP not to identify the boy to protect his privacy. The case is being handled in Gwinnett County Juvenile Court, and juvenile cases are generally sealed to protect the child.

Salmon said she was hired by the boy's court-appointed guardian who believes the state plans to ask the court to send him to his father. She does not believe that is best for the child. The Associated Press has filed a motion seeking to open the court proceedings to the media to hear the discussion about what is in the child's best interest.

The boy has been in foster care since his father's arrest and has been moved from one home to another, nine in all, over about two years, Salmon said. She described him as rebellious and said he needs counseling. He now lives in a group home, but Salmon said she is seeking therapeutic placement for him. That would put him in a group home or with a family that is trained to handle children with special needs.

"Instead of solving the problems he has, he's just been shuffled from one place to another, and now they're out of places and they are trying to send him to a foreign country," Salmon said.

Guatemala prepared report
In an e-mail earlier this year, the state's Department of Human Resources, which oversees the Division of Family and Children Services, asked Guatemalan officials for a home evaluation for the family in Guatemala. An agency spokeswoman, Dena Smith, declined to comment on the state's plans for the boy, but said its priorities for every child are safety and permanency.

"Legally, we cannot talk about any open case of any child," Smith said. "Case plans are individualized and are based on the needs of the individual child."

A Guatemalan official wrote a letter to the Georgia child welfare division in July 2008 stating that the boy's aunt in Guatemala said he would be better off in the U.S. because of his "psychological and behavioral problems."

A more detailed home study was done in early 2009. A translation of the report provided to the AP says Juares lives with his father, the boy's paternal grandfather, that both are interested in having custody of the child, and it appears they can care for and protect him. But it also recommends the child's rights as a U.S. citizen, including access to a better quality of life, be taken into account.

The report says the grandfather, who is 67, earns up to $616 a month farming his land and operating corn mills. Juares earns about $18 a day as a bus driver but doesn't have regular work, it says. They live in a rural area with access to "basic public utilities such as water, electricity, elementary and basic education."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31686942/ns/us_news-life/

Quality of life should not matter whether the kid has cable TV or a free public education, free medical care, etc.
Mom from El Salvador runs of and the kid has behavioral problems. What this kid needs is a loving family, which it seems dad and grandpa are able to provide. Send him home, and I don't believe any kid born to two illegal parents should even be considered a US citizen.

Send him home. He is not an American citizen.

Sounds like the kid will grow up to be a serial killer or and arsonist or something like that.

This should NOT even be a question. All Anchors should be deported with their parents if under the age of 21.Period,End Of Story !!

Our idiot govrnment is soo PC it is harming chidren who need their families.

These children have only their ILLEGAL parents to blame. The ILLEGAL parents knew what they were doing; Abuse of the 14th Amendment to create an Anchor Baby and more ILLEGALS for U.S. Citizens to furnish benefits! The Elitist Politicians and their Elitist Contributors are socializing benefits to the ILLEGALS for the ILLEGAL EMPLOYERS, veiled as welfare for U. S. Citizens, on the backs of U.S. Citizens through our assets such as the Education System, Social Security, and Health Care not to mention our National Security while privatizing the profits for themselves!

The only reason the ILLEGALS have the Anchors is to stay in the United States to receive the benefits, their Anchors are nothing more than throwaways for their agenda; if they were important to the parents they would take their children with them when they returned to their HOME countries . They do not want to be Citizens of the United States only to the extent that it would allow the ILLEGALS to remain in the United States for our tax money and they will return south of the border as soon as they have drained the United States Dry.