Results 1 to 5 of 5
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: DISGUSTING: Open Borders Claire McCaskill Lies to Missourians on Her Immigration Reco

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member stoptheinvaders's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    3,374

    DISGUSTING: Open Borders Claire McCaskill Lies to Missourians on Her Immigration Reco

    DISGUSTING: Open Borders Claire McCaskill Lies to Missourians on Her Immigration Record in New TV Ad — Is Against Trump Border Wall


    Liberal Senator Claire McCaskill is a far left hack who has NEVER disappointed the Democrat Party.
    When they need a vote — Claire is there for them.
    Always.

    <font color="#666666"><span style="font-family: Catamaran">

    Claire McCaskill gets most of her donations from Hollywood elites.
    But come election time Claire McCaskill comes back to Missouri and pretends to be one of the people.

    This past week Claire McCaskill launched an ad with Border Patrol agents pretending to be tough on immigration.
    This could be Claire McCaskill’s worst lie to date…


    McCaskill has openly and repeatedly mocked President Trump’s border wall.
    McCaskill told CBS News that Trump’s border wall is “embarrasing” and “it’s not going to happen.”


    It is stunning the border patrol would throw their support behind open borders Claire McCaskill?
    <font color="#666666"><span style="font-family: Catamaran">


    Here are the facts on Claire McCaskill and border security.

    The Josh Howley campaign released this rebuttal to Claire’s outrageous lie!
    COLUMBIA, Mo. – In a new TV ad about border security, Senator Claire McCaskill is lying to Missourians about her record.
    Hawley Campaign Press Secretary Kelli Ford said, “Claire McCaskill will do anything to hold on to power, even lie to Missourians about her record on immigration. She isn’t tough on border security. She’s weak and her record proves it. She thinks the border wall is ‘embarrassing,’ has flip-flopped on sanctuary cities, refuses to ask who is and isn’t a citizen, and wants to pass catch-and-release legislation. Instead of standing for security, she stood with Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi.
    “That record would get her re-elected in New York or California, but not Missouri, and Senator McCaskill knows it. That’s exactly why she is trying to deceive voters about her work on immigration. She has richly earned the title of the most unpopular senator on a ballot this fall because she doesn’t stand with Missouri, she only cares about opposing President Trump. And she’s willing to sacrifice our safety and security in order to make that happen.”
    CLAIM VS. FACT

    CLAIM: She Was One Of Only Four Democrats To Vote To End Sanctuary Cities.
    FACT: McCaskill Flip-Flopped On Withholding Certain Law Enforcement Grants For Sanctuary Cities.
    In February 2018, McCaskill Voted For Cloture On The Toomey Amendment That Would Make Sanctuary Cities Ineligible For Certain Federal Law Enforcement Grants. (S.Amdt. 1948 To S.Amdt. 1959 To H.R. 2579, Roll Call Vote #34: Cloture Motion Rejected 54-45, 2/15/18, McCaskill Voted Yea; CQ Summary, Accessed 2/16/1
    Previously, McCaskill Voted Twice Against Cloture On The Motion To Proceed To Bills That Would Withhold Federal Law Enforcement Grants For Sanctuary Cities:

    • In July 2016, McCaskill Voted Against Cloture On The Motion To Proceed To A Bill That Would Make Sanctuary Cities Ineligible For Certain Federal Law Enforcement Grants. (S. 3100, Roll Call Vote #119: Cloture On The Motion To Proceed Rejected 53-44, 7/6/16, McCaskill Voted Nay; CQ Summary, 7/6/16)
    • In October 2015, McCaskill Voted Against Cloture On The Motion To Proceed To A Bill That Would Withhold Certain Federal Law Enforcement Funds For Sanctuary Cities. (S. 2146, Roll Call Vote #280: Cloture On The Motion To Proceed Rejected 54-45, 10/20/15, McCaskill Voted Nay; CQ Summary, Accessed 1/15/16)

    FACT: McCaskill Also Voted Against Cutting COPS Program Funding For Sanctuary Cities.
    In 2007, McCaskill Voted Against The Vitter Amendment That Would Block Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) Funding To Communities That Refused To Help With Federal Enforcement Of Immigration Law. (S. Amdt. 3277 To H.R. 3093, Roll Call Vote #370, Motion To Table Agreed To 52-42, 10/16/07, McCaskill Voted Yea; CQ Summary, Accessed 7/21/16)
    CLAIM: [McCaskill] Votes To Secure Our Border. We Endorse President Trump And Claire McCaskill Because Of Their Records On Border Security.
    FACT: McCaskill Is Not Supportive Of President Trump’s Border Wall.

    • McCaskill On Border Wall: “It’s Embarrassing. It’s Not Going To Happen.” “‘It’s embarrassing,’ McCaskill said. ‘It’s not going to happen. Everybody in Congress knows it’s not going to happen…. It appears the only person who won’t say it out loud is the president.’” (CBS News, 4/5/17)

    FACT: McCaskill Opposes Asking Citizenship Status In The U.S. Census.
    MCCASKILL: “I do think there’s going to be litigation over it. Yeah, California filed suit saying that it was unconstitutional because it was depressing the count. It is I believe blatantly partisan.” (Claire McCaskill, Remarks, Springfield, MO, 3/27/1
    CLAIM: Take It From Us, No Senator Is Tougher On Securing The Border Than Claire McCaskill.
    FACT: McCaskill Is A Current Co-Sponsor Of Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s Open Borders Bill.

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...p-border-wall/
    Last edited by stoptheinvaders; 09-25-2018 at 05:26 PM.
    You've got to Stand for Something or You'll Fall for Anything

  2. #2
    Senior Member stoptheinvaders's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    3,374
    National Border Patrol Council endorses Claire McCaskill for U.S. Senate

    National Border Patrol CouncilPublished 7:00 p.m. CT Sept. 12, 2018

    (Photo: Rudy Gutierrez)




    As the union representing 15,000 Border Patrol agents at both our Northern and Southern borders, the National Border Patrol Council is proud to endorse Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill in her campaign for re-election to the U.S. Senate. In 2018, we endorsed Donald Trump for president because he was tough on borders and strong on enforcement. We’re endorsing Claire McCaskill now for the exact same reasons.

    Senator McCaskill has risen above the partisanship of Washington to genuinely listen to the concerns of Border Patrol agents and to fight for the increase in resources and staff needed at the border. Our agents put their lives on the line every day to keep this nation secure, and we need lawmakers like Senator McCaskill who will work across party lines to provide the support we need to do our jobs effectively.

    As the ranking member of the powerful Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, Senator McCaskill has met with agents on the southern border and taken their concerns back to Washington. She worked on a bipartisan deal for $25 billion in increased border security and co-sponsored legislation for $600 million in additional security funding. She personally introduced an amendment to allow the hiring of 1,000 more Border Patrol agents and pushed for new technology to enhance surveillance and detection. She took action when agents explained they were working with faulty equipment on a daily basis.

    Whether a state shares a foreign border or not, all Americans must be concerned about border security and the safety of America’s citizens. No state is spared the consequences and costs of illegal immigration. Senator McCaskill understands law enforcement and she knows the unique challenges Border Patrol agents face every day as they work to keep Americans safe.
    Sen. Claire McCaskill (Photo: File photo)

    We need elected officials in Washington who will work with both parties to strengthen our borders. We need lawmakers like Senator McCaskill who don’t just talk about being tough on borders but actually do something about it. Senator McCaskill has fought for border security and comprehensive immigration solutions to keep our great country safe. We trust her judgment and commitment — that is why she has more than earned our endorsement.
    The National Border Patrol Council represents U.S. Border Patrol agents.

    https://www.news-leader.com/story/opinion/2018/09/13/border-patrol-council-endorses-claire-mccaskill/1278451002/

    You've got to Stand for Something or You'll Fall for Anything

  3. #3
    Senior Member stoptheinvaders's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    3,374
    Heads must roll!

    When will the citizens of this country say enough is enough?
    You've got to Stand for Something or You'll Fall for Anything

  4. #4
    Senior Member stoptheinvaders's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    3,374
    The Border Patrol's Corruption Problem

    You've got to Stand for Something or You'll Fall for Anything

  5. #5
    Senior Member stoptheinvaders's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    3,374
    In this video, I only see rescues and the Border Control being a hero to the invaders


    United States Border Patrol: What is a Hero?

    United States Border Patrol: What is a Hero?
    You've got to Stand for Something or You'll Fall for Anything

Similar Threads

  1. Open Borders Claire McCaskill Lies to Missourians on Her Immigration Record in New TV
    By Airbornesapper07 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-25-2018, 09:24 PM
  2. Illegal Aliens, Identity Theft, and Claire McCaskill
    By Jean in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-28-2018, 10:17 AM
  3. New Porker of the Month - Claire McCaskill
    By kathyet in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-30-2011, 09:32 AM
  4. Sen. Claire McCaskill on Illegal Immigration
    By alamb in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-07-2008, 07:42 PM
  5. Claire McCaskill responds
    By jamesw62 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-29-2008, 10:41 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •