Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443

    Is immigration reform in sight, or is it a mirage?

    Budget-Deal Vapors

    By Major Garrett
    December 17, 2013
    national journal

    The budget deal is a testament to the politics of exhaustion. And exhaust.

    House Republicans were beaten up and bedraggled and justifiably feared a shutdown sequel as futile and stupid as Anchorman 2 appears to be. The White House was and remains exhausted by the agonies of Obamacare and wouldn't open up a second battle front on the budget—especially when House Republicans were willing to sue for peace on the second year of sequestration. Senate Democrats were empowered to cut the deal and did so by reviving the time-honored Washington tradition of trading spending now for savings much, much later.

    The contours of the deal thus established, the House passed the budget deal and fled the Capitol for the exhaust fumes of waiting airliners at neighboring airports. The Senate is about to do the same, leaving behind vapor trails of bipartisan peace on earth and good will toward appropriators.

    Of course, the path to this two-year spending cease-fire was paved over the bowed backs of conservative advocacy groups—most aligned with tea-party sentiments, some that popped up to profit from them—who helped create the House Republican majority in 2010 and protect it in 2012.

    House Speaker John Boehner twice called the conservatives' bluff and bulldozed them. It was a first, and the relish with which Boehner dispatched his conservative critics (and the not-so-quiet cloakroom and corridor huzzahs he received from rank-and-file Republicans) raises this juicy question: Did it foreshadow a breakthrough on immigration?

    Immigration is, after all, the last remaining domestic priority President Obama and Boehner share. Obama and Boehner's relationship, while not warm, is less confrontational and more routinely civil. They've spoken twice since mid-November. Obama called Boehner to wish him happy birthday on Nov. 17 and after the House passed the budget deal. Dealings on Obama's State of the Union address, previously a bit nettlesome at the staff level, were routine.

    This doesn't mean immigration can or will pass. But irritants of the past are precisely that. New possibilities have presented themselves, and the political and tactical climate may, several months hence, be such that Obama and Boehner find passing immigration reform irresistible.

    Obama has already sent signals to this effect. He no longer demands the House pass the Senate immigration bill. After hinting in July he would accept a piecemeal approach, he repeated the statement again in September and did so unequivocally in November. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi had to reluctantly climb on board, just as she had to do on the budget deal. Obama moved. House Republicans didn't budge. Obama's troubles with the Affordable Care Act are not going away. Implementation will continue to present political and operational problems, something the White House knew well in advance of the website fiasco (which is why the bungled rollout will look even worse in the summer of 2014 than it does now). Obama may well need a significant policy victory in 2014, and immigration will be the only live option. It's no coincidence he reinforced his willingness to accept a piecemeal approach on immigration in the midst of cyclone Obamacare.

    Boehner signaled back with the hiring in December of Rebecca Tallent, a former chief of staff to Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and a key player in drafting the 2007 immigration bill Boehner relentlessly demonized to defeat. Top Obama advisers now believe they have an immigration interlocutor in Boehner's office. One of the president's closest advisers told me it's possible Boehner would have hired Tallent for cynical reasons (to appear more aggressive on reform than he actually is), but there is zero chance Tallent would be so duped. Her treatise on the road to immigration reform speaks for itself.

    Tallent's role gives House Republicans something they've never had since 2010—a staffer who knows immigration policy and politics on both sides of the aisle and has the confidence and respect of the White House and Democrats. Until Tallent arrived, immigration legislation was written by Virginia Rep. Bob Goodlatte's able Judiciary subcommittee staff, many of them holdovers from former immigration hard-liner Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas. Smith—and to a certain extent Goodlatte—have specialized in drafting legislation just conservative enough for House Democrats to rebel. Tallent has the expertise, if so empowered by Boehner and the GOP conference, to drive a hard bargain that pulls Democrats farther than they would prefer, but not past the breaking point of compromise.

    This may have been why Boehner lowered the boom over the budget. Boehner needed to prove to himself and his conference that defying conservative critics wasn't suicidal. That lesson will reverberate long after the piddling details of the budget deal are forgotten. And it could provide the legislative and political muscle memory Boehner needs to move on immigration in the spring.

    Boehner has to wait for the bulk of primary season to pass (May or June) before serious immigration work can begin. By then, much of the legislation can be written and the calendar cleared for action in the summer. The House GOP leader on the budget deal, Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., may emerge as a key figure. Ryan's pedigree is not on immigration policy, but conference conservatives will follow him. He has the scars of the budget fights, the experience of a national campaign, and a wide-open calendar to freelance now that spending numbers have been set for the next two years. Ryan has boundless policy energy and equally boundless ambition. If Boehner needs or wants a new driver on immigration, one tested by fire from the right, he may well choose Ryan.

    Interestingly, Ryan waded straight into the immigration debate Monday on a Wisconsin radio station, defining the limits of acceptable reform.

    "First we must have the border security, and independently verified," Ryan told WTMJ in Milwaukee (listen here.). "First we must have the interior enforcement like E-Verify in place and independently verified before the other parts of the law that they want to go into place go into place," he said. "So it's not a 'trust, hope, and promise.' It's a 'get what we want, verify it's there.' Then the rest of the law can be triggered."

    Immigration-reform advocates with ties to the White House see Ryan's outline as more specific and enforceable than the "triggers" in the Senate immigration bill. They interpret Ryan calling for six or eight separate bills (the now-agreed upon piecemeal approach), starting with border security and interior enforcement followed by the other components of reform—legalization, path to citizenship, agricultural/seasonal workers, and the Dream Act. This process bears a striking resemblance to Tallent's aforementioned roadmap.

    As for the benefits of passing immigration reform, Ryan sounded bullish. "Guaranteed border security, guaranteed interior enforcement, no amnesty—then I think that's productive. I think that's in our interest. I think that's good for our country."

    These are not the words of a Republican fearful of the internal or external politics of immigration reform. Quite the contrary. Ryan held fast on the budget and he and Boehner are both still standing, arguably stronger than at any time since 2010. Amid the vapor trails and exhaust of the holiday season's mad rush out of Washington, what may have emerged is a new political dynamic in the House GOP, one that could augur well for immigration reform, Boehner, Ryan, and even Obama.

    And that's no smoke and mirrors.

    http://www.nationaljournal.com/all-p...apors-20131217
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443

    National Journal: Paul Ryan Will Lead House on Amnesty After GOP Primaries

    by Matthew Boyle 18 Dec 2013, 12:30 PM PDT
    breitbart.com



    The National Journal’s Major Garrett is out with a new report detailing how House GOP leadership plans to push an immigration bill that would grant amnesty to America’s at least 11 million illegal aliens in 2014, a bill that would move after GOP primary season and have House Budget Committee chairman Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) leading the way.

    “Boehner has to wait for the bulk of primary season to pass (May or June) before serious immigration work can begin,” Garrett wrote.

    By then, much of the legislation can be written and the calendar cleared for action in the summer. The House GOP leader on the budget deal, Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., may emerge as a key figure. Ryan's pedigree is not on immigration policy, but conference conservatives will follow him. He has the scars of the budget fights, the experience of a national campaign, and a wide-open calendar to freelance now that spending numbers have been set for the next two years. Ryan has boundless policy energy and equally boundless ambition. If Boehner needs or wants a new driver on immigration, one tested by fire from the right, he may well choose Ryan.

    Garrett then quoted a radio interview Ryan did in Wisconsin on Monday, where he talked about immigration.

    “First we must have the border security, and independently verified,” Ryan said in the radio interview. “First we must have the interior enforcement like E-Verify in place and independently verified before the other parts of the law that they want to go into place go into place. So it's not a ‘trust, hope, and promise.’ It's a ‘get what we want, verify it's there.’ Then the rest of the law can be triggered.”

    “Guaranteed border security, guaranteed interior enforcement, no amnesty—then I think that's productive,” Ryan added. “I think that's in our interest. I think that's good for our country.”

    A GOP aide to a congressional committee said of Ryan’s radio comments that it is clear Ryan “is describing a 'Gang of Eight' style bill that has amnesty first and pointless triggers later” that is “a huge handout to big business, too.”

    Ryan has not said that border security and interior enforcement must be implemented before any bills that deal with legalization of illegal aliens’ statuses or a massive increase in guest workers or legal immigration are taken up in the House. A massive increase in legal immigration or guest workers would cut into unemployed and underemployed Americans’ job hunting prospects.

    Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) said on the Senate floor earlier this week that the House should not take up any immigration bills until President Barack Obama actually starts securing the border and enforcing the laws of the land.

    “Speaker Boehner of the House has said that they will not take up the Senate bill, but will take up several immigration bills in a step-by-step approach,” Sessions said on the Senate floor.

    But does anyone believe this administration will actually enforce anything that they pass? They’re not enforcing current law. I urge the House to ensure that before they get into passing laws and conferring on any comprehensive bill, they start insisting and help us insist that this administration enforce the law that we have. If they just refuse to do it, why should we assume that passing a law has any ability to change the path we are on? The first responsibility of Congress must be to restore the rule of law, to secure the border, and to bring the Administration into compliance with the laws of the United States. Until that happens, there's no reason or basis to offer up any legalization plans considered in congress. Congress cannot capitulate into this overreach.

    Sessions added, “no one is above the law.”

    “Failure to uphold our laws violates our legal and moral responsibilities to our own citizens and those who came to this country legally and creates the preconditions necessary for a repressive and capricious government,” Sessions said.

    Last week, Ryan helped muscle the “Bipartisan Budget Agreement,” a deal he cut with Senate Budget Committee chairwoman Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA), through the House. The bill is expected to pass the Senate on Wednesday.

    To win the House GOP conference, Ryan used a series of talking points about the bill that were not accurate--as Breitbart News has detailed over the course of a series of stories. Ryan, according to Senate Budget Committee ranking member Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), used double counting techniques that Democrats employed with Obamacare. Ryan claimed the bill would result in $23 billion in deficit reduction when, in reality—after taking the double counting and the interest on borrowed money for new spending into account—it would end up increasing the deficit by at least $15.5 billion.

    Ryan’s committee also published a document falsely claiming that disabled and injured veterans’ pensions would be protected from slashes in the Ryan-Murray budget, a claim Ryan’s spokesman admitted to Breitbart News was inaccurate. Ryan’s committee scrubbed the document of the false claim and his spokesman will not answer when asked repeatedly if Ryan or his committee told members of the House of Representatives of the error and correction before they voted for his deal with Murray.

    Moving forward into the immigration fight, Ryan is even more pro-amnesty than Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) was. Ryan is still publicly supportive of a conference committee between a group of House immigration bills and the Senate’s “Gang of Eight” legislation, even though Rubio and House Speaker John Boehner, Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy, and Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte have all come out against conference.

    Rubio had used misleading talking points on immigration, something for which he has paid dearly politically and is still attempting to recover. Since Ryan has used misleading talking points on the budget, the question moving into next year will become whether or not Ryan has political capital left to burn or whether conservatives in the House start standing up to him.

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...-Ryan-in-front
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    working4change
    Guest
    Second article added to the Home page
    http://www.alipac.us/content.php?r=2...-GOP-Primaries

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •