Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member FedUpinFarmersBranch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,603

    EU lawmakers back controversial new immigration rules

    EU lawmakers back controversial new immigration rules
    By JAN SLIVA Associated Press Writer
    Article Launched: 06/18/2008 07:44:18 AM MDT


    STRASBOURG, France—The European Parliament on Wednesday approved controversial new rules for expelling illegal immigrants from the bloc, overcoming opposition from left-leaning lawmakers and ignoring protests from human rights activists.
    The move comes amid a tide of anti-immigrant sentiment across the wealthy bloc, with Italy blaming foreigners for a spike in violent crime and France grappling with tensions in the immigrant-heavy suburbs ringing urban centers.

    As economic hard times loom in many EU countries, governments are coming under increased pressure to act tough on immigration. Until now, there has been no common EU policy on expelling illegal immigrants, and detention periods varied from 32 days in France to indefinite custody in Britain, the Netherlands and five other countries.

    Under the new guidelines, already approved by EU governments, illegals can be held in specialized detention centers for up to 18 months before being expelled. EU countries must provide detained migrants basic rights, including access to free legal advice, and unaccompanied children or families with children should be held only as a last resort.

    Once found by authorities, immigrants first will be given the opportunity to leave voluntarily within 30 days. If there is a flight risk or they do not comply, they can be put in custody for up to six months while their deportation is processed.

    A 12-month extension would be possible in specific cases, such

    as when illegal immigrants do not cooperate with authorities or when their identity must be verified with their home country. A re-entry ban of up to five years may be imposed on expelled immigrants who do not cooperate or are deemed a threat.
    "We've got the best deal possible, given the differences" among countries, said Graham Watson, leader of the Liberal Democrats in the chamber.

    The agreement, approved 369-197 with 106 abstentions, took more than two years to draft, and EU nations will have two years to implement it. The new rules—part of efforts to create a common EU asylum and immigration policy by 2010—will not automatically apply in Britain and Ireland because they are not members of the EU's borderless Schengen zone, and Denmark, which has negotiated an opt-out.

    Many Socialists and Greens were against the law, arguing the maximum allowed detention period was too long and a re-entry ban not justified. But they were outvoted by conservative and liberal groups, which hailed the new rules as an improvement.

    "By introducing minimum safeguards we limit possible excessive behavior by governments," said Dutch Liberal Democrat Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert.

    She pointed out that in a number of countries, illegal immigrants await deportation in regular jails alongside convicted criminals—which will no longer be allowed under the new rules.

    But Amnesty International condemned the deal, saying it does not guarantee the return of migrants in safety and dignity.

    "An excessive period of detention of up to 1.5 years as well as an EU-wide re-entry ban for those forcibly returned risk lowering existing standards in the member states and set an extremely bad example to other regions in the world," the human rights watchdog said.

    However, French Immigration Minister Brice Hortefeux rejected that criticism, saying that standards will not be lowered in his country and the 32-day custody period—the lowest in Europe—will not be changed.

    The EU estimates there could be up to 8 million illegal immigrants in the 27-nation bloc.

    France's Immigration Ministry estimates 200,000 to 400,000 illegal immigrants in the country with a population of 63 million.

    Spain, another country grappling with clandestine immigrants, said it was considering raising the maximum custody from the current 40 days to 60—still far below the maximum allowed period.

    Italy, which has toughened immigration policy under the new government of Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, has already raised custody to the maximum limit in anticipation of the law.

    France's Education Without Borders Network, the most active group working on behalf of illegal immigrants, said it feared more countries would now take similar measures. It condemned the law in an open letter signed by personalities, intellectuals and politicians.



    The nerve of these RACISTS


    http://www.elpasotimes.com/nationworld/ci_9621988
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member SOSADFORUS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    IDAHO
    Posts
    19,570
    I guess the one world order is not so orderly anywhere in the world....seems most country's are suffering from the same problems as Americans and just like us the problem is falling on deaf ears.....looks to me like they better clean their ears and listen up real soon.



    >>ACTION ALERT 6/18<<
    It's D-day in NC so lets help the boots on the ground!!
    We need calls from those who can not attend the "RALLY IN RALEIGH"
    PLEASE TAKE ACTION IN NORTH CAROLINA
    INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION!
    http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-119822.html
    Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member LawEnforcer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,219
    This will give the anti-illegal movement in the U.S. some credibility.
    If the liberal Euros are changing their ways, this is a good sign for us.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    776
    Quote Originally Posted by LawEnforcer
    This will give the anti-illegal movement in the U.S. some credibility.
    If the liberal Euros are changing their ways, this is a good sign for us.
    I beg to differ the idiots in Dc will never get it as long as they are being dictated to by outside influences.it seems they are hell bent on giving it all away to the scumbag third world cheap labour thugs.
    We can't deport them all ? Just think of the fun we could have trying!

  5. #5
    Senior Member LawEnforcer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,219
    Quote Originally Posted by Justonehero
    Quote Originally Posted by LawEnforcer
    This will give the anti-illegal movement in the U.S. some credibility.
    If the liberal Euros are changing their ways, this is a good sign for us.
    I beg to differ the idiots in Dc will never get it as long as they are being dictated to by outside influences.it seems they are hell bent on giving it all away to the scumbag third world cheap labour thugs.
    Well hopefully some patriot senators like Session will point to the EU to give those few spineless senators some cover.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •