Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Virginiamama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    2,088

    Immigration debate sparks family feud in Congress

    http://www.decaturdaily.com/decaturdail ... rder.shtml


    THURSDAY, MAY 18, 2006
    Immigration debate sparks family feud in Congress
    By David Espo
    AP Special Correspondent

    WASHINGTON — The immigration debate in Congress is looking more and more like a family feud, Republican style.

    "Regardless of what the president says, what he is proposing is amnesty," one prominent House committee chairman said Wednesday in a blistering attack on the policies and the credibility of a chief executive of his own party.

    The blast came from Rep. James Sensenbrenner of Wisconsin, who heads the House Judiciary Committee and would lead House negotiators in any compromise talks with the Senate on a year-end compromise.

    Sensenbrenner's remark came on a day the Senate agreed to give millions of illegal immigrants a shot at U.S. citizenship and backed construction of 370 miles of triple-layered fencing along the Mexican border — and as GOP senators clashed over the meaning of amnesty.

    "This is not amnesty, so let's get the terms right," Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska lectured fellow Republicans who condemned the bill. "Come on. Let's stop the nonsense."

    "It sort of reminds me of the famous line, 'Methinks thou dost protest too much,' " responded Sen. David Vitter, R-La., who repeatedly described the legislation as an amnesty bill for lawbreakers.

    Rhetoric aside, the votes on the Senate floor gave fresh momentum to legislation that closely follows Bush's call for a broad bill. The measure includes steps to secure the borders, the citizenship-related provisions for illegal immigrants and a new guest worker program for as many as 200,000 people a year. Senate passage appears likely next week.

    The political wheels turned as demonstrators massed within sight of the Capitol demanding greater rights for immigrants, the latest evidence of rising passions in connection with efforts to write the most significant overhaul of immigration law in two decades.

    With the administration eager to emphasize its commitment to border security, officials continued to flesh out details of Bush's Monday night announcement that he would send up to 6,000 National Guard troops to states along the Mexican border.

    Lt. Gen. Steven Blum, chief of the National Guard Bureau, raised the possibility that Guard members could be sent over the objections of a state's governor.

    "If a governor truly did not want this mission performed in their state, then the option is there for the president and the secretary of defense to federalize the Guard. And then the mission would be conducted, and then it would be without the control of the governor," he said.

    Vitter led the drive to strip from the bill a provision giving an eventual chance at citizenship to illegal immigrants who have been in the country more than two years. His attempt failed, 66-33, at the hands of a bipartisan coalition, and the provision survived. In all, 41 Democrats joined with 24 Republicans and one independent to turn back the proposal. Opponents included the leaders of both parties, Sens. Bill Frist, R-Tenn., and Harry Reid, D-Nev. Thirty-one Republicans and two Democrats supported Vitter's amendment.

    The vote to build what supporters called a "real fence" — as distinct from the virtual fence already incorporated in the legislation — was 83-16. The fence would be built in areas "most often used by smugglers and illegal aliens," as determined by federal officials. Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Mobile, estimated the cost at roughly $3.2 million per mile, more than $900 million for 300 miles.

    The provision includes a call for construction of 500 miles of vehicle barriers, adding to a system currently in place.

    It marked the first significant victory for conservatives eager to leave their stamp on a measure that looks increasingly like it is headed toward Senate passage.

    Construction would send "a signal that open-border days are over. . . . Good fences make good neighbors, fences don't make bad neighbors," Sessions said. He said border areas where barriers are in place have experienced economic improvement and reduced crime.

    "What we have here has become a symbol for the right wing in American politics," countered Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill. He said if the proposal passed, "our relationship with Mexico would come down to a barrier between our two countries."

    All Republicans and more than half the Senate's Demo-crats supported the proposal. A core group of bill supporters who have held off other more serious challenges in the past two days made little attempt to fight this one, judging it far less damaging than the attack on the citizenship provision or an attempt on Tuesday to strip out a guest worker program.

    Supporters of the Senate measure credited Bush's prime-time Monday night speech with giving fresh momentum to the effort to pass long-stalled legislation.

    Across the Capitol in the House, the story was different.

    Sensenbrenner's remarks were unusually sharp, given his chairmanship. "He said four times this is not amnesty. Well, it is an amnesty, because it allows people who have broken the law to stay in the country," he said of the positions Bush staked out in his speech earlier in the week.

    In a conference call with reporters, Sensenbrenner also said Bush had "basically turned his back" on a tough border security bill after requesting that certain provisions be included before passage last year.

    The House legislation passed over strenuous Democratic opposition. It would make all illegal aliens subject to prosecution as felons and calls for construction of a 700-mile fence along the Mexican border — more than twice as long as the barrier the Senate backed during the day.

    Several members of the rank-and-file have criticized Bush for his proposals. To calm their concerns, White House aide Karl Rove attended the regular closed door meeting of the rank and file, where participants said he sought to reassure lawmakers about the administration's commitment to securing the borders.
    Equal rights for all, special privileges for none. Thomas Jefferson

  2. #2
    Senior Member Shapka's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Staten Island, New York
    Posts
    3,044
    Hagel is such a louse.

    How the hell does someone like that get re-elected in a state like Nebraska?

    Reporting without fear or favor-American Rattlesnake

  3. #3
    Senior Member WavTek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,431
    "This is not amnesty, so let's get the terms right," Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska lectured fellow Republicans who condemned the bill. "Come on. Let's stop the nonsense."
    Yes, Senator Hagel, please do stop the nonsense and quit supporting amnesty!
    REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •