The Future of Europe

Dissolution in Europe's future?
By Arnold Beichman
December 30, 2006


Some four decades ago, Enoch Powell, a British Conservative parliamentarian, delivered a controversial speech about immigration from Commonwealth countries.
His words shocked his party leaders and led to his political downfall. Said Powell, soldier, academic and classicist in April 1968: "[T]he immigrant communities can organize to consolidate their members, to agitate and campaign against their fellow citizens, and to overawe and dominate the rest with the legal weapons which the ignorant and the ill-informed have provided. As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding. Like the Roman, I seem to see the River Tiber foaming with much blood." (Powell was alluding to Virgil's line from the epic "Aeneid" about the Tiber foaming with blood. (For Latinists: "Et Thybrim multo spumantem sanguine cerno.")
The day after, Edwin Heath, leader of the Conservative Opposition, sacked Powell from his Shadow Cabinet post. Powell never again held another senior political post. But his words ring loud and clear as we look upon the sociopolitical phenomenon of our time, a phenomenon that has been called the Islamization of Europe's cities and the growth of Euro-Islamist populations. The prominent Swedish blogger who calls himself Fjordman has supplied some tormenting predictions about what Europe's Islamization entails:
Previously, Europeans or non-Europeans could travel between countries and visit new cities, each with its own, distinctive character and peculiarities. Soon they will travel from London to Paris, Amsterdam or Stockholm and find you have left one city dominated by burkas and Shariah (Muslim law) to yet another city dominated by burkas and Shariah.
A 2004 study under the auspices of Frances inspector-general of education described a school system where Muslim students regularly boycotted classes when Voltaire, Rousseau and Moliere were discussed. The reason? Muslim students accused them of being anti-Islamic. The same report cited the refusal of Muslim students to use the plus sign in mathematics because it looks like a crucifix and their boycott of class trips to churches, cathedrals and monasteries.
Population statistics support the Muslim claim that within a decade they will be the majority in all major cities like Amsterdam and Rotterdam. In face of these developments, what follows?
The massive concentration of Muslims in major European cities, writes Fjordman, will have dramatic consequences, some of which are already visible. If this concentration continues in Europe this is what the future holds:
The state may not be able to guarantee the security of its urban citizens. If ordinary citizens feel the state is no longer able to guarantee their safety, perhaps native Europeans will create clans of their own to counter the Muslim clans.
The result will be a retribalization of Europe and, likely, the end of the nation-state.
Happy New Year, everybody.

Arnold Beichman is a research fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution and a columnist for The Washington Times.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/commenta ... -7602r.htm

Like I said before, Europe needs to wake up, and get rid of the Trojan Horse it brought into it's midst!

If we can't get Americans to see what is going on and wake up how Europeans who live already for so many time under this caos are going to wake up ?
We have the greatest FREEDOM in the world and we are giving up, how can we expect those less free to fight for freedom ?

And didn't I hear that there are over 250,000 Muslims living in Michigan?
(This was televised during Saddam's execution coverage.)

It's happening here already. It's at the point where I don't think we can stop it. There isn't the political will in congress to do anything. The only real fight in Washington is over just how quickly we can legalize these criminals and just how many benefits we can give them as it happens. We can't even get a 700 mile fence funded at a time when up to 10 thousand illegals cross over every single day. Politician know hispanics will determine who controls congress so they cater to them.

In other words our own politicians in Washington are making an active choice to represent illegals over US citizens at a time of war. They are knowingly leaving our border unsecured at a time when they absolutely know terrorist are sneaking over. And these politicians, our elected representatives, have made these decisions knowingly.

I think they have the lobbyest. so they have the money,
Have you notice last time bush was on TV behind him were condi rice, the new defense secretary dick cheiney, all of them members of the foreign relation, dick cheney was the day before uesterday, on CSPAN in a dinner party of the CFR giving a speach and telling he was one of the directors of that entity but when he campaig nobody knew that.
I also heard taht pelosi told CSPAN that now as she is the house speaker
she won't allow anymore the section to be LIVE televised .
Big problems aproching, what she doesn't want us to see ?