Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member concernedmother's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    955

    Globalization Changing Societal Rules

    http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniont...e03hoagla.html


    JIM HOAGLAND THE WASHINGTON POST
    Globalization changing societal rules

    April 3, 2006

    The French and protests go together like horse and carriage, love and marriage and other natural partners. But look again at the million and more demonstrators who have taken to the streets in France in recent days. In their marching and shouting, there is a hidden message for us all about coming generational and cultural conflicts.

    France has moved into one of its periodic dangerous seasons, in which a conservative government has acted as if its fate and the chances for the country's future economic growth depended on facing down or outlasting massive street protests. Both 1789 and 1968 remind how such calculations can misfire in France.

    Protesters have filled the streets this spring to define themselves and their nation more clearly and aggressively than most of the world would ever care or dare to attempt. The young rebels follow the Cartesian rigor taught in the universities that they are boycotting: I protest, therefore I am.

    This struggle concerns, as so many things do for the French, identity. They are a society of individualists who take pride in an entrenched sense of solidarity. That solidarity is under such intense pressure from the forces of globalization that it must be proclaimed in the streets if it is to survive at all.

    But for all its Francocentricity, this labor upheaval sounds echoes of the recent demonstrations staged by Hispanic immigrant groups in the United States and our own debate over alien workers. In all developed countries, the forces of globalization are changing the rules and even the nature of work – just as demographic patterns are forcing a re-examination of the implicit social contract between young and old.

    Politicians naturally respond to the challenges posed by the easy flow of goods, people and ideas across frontiers by pretending these challenges can be met with isolated exercises of political will and legislation. The harsh anti-immigrant laws proposed by the U.S. House of Representatives defy not only common decency and humanity, but the very way in which the global economy works today. The laws prove that change is too important to be left to politicians.

    The global connections need to be grasped and articulated if societies are to do a better job of dividing the fruits of the prosperity that globalization brings for some of their citizens and the burdens of unemployment or low wages that others experience.

    Even less commented on by the politicians of the world is the looming conflict between the economic interests of the young, who are just starting careers, and of their elders, who are in or moving into retirements that almost no industrialized country has set aside the funds to finance.

    That is where we all have something to learn from the springtime confrontation in France, which also stems from narrow local factors such as internal power struggles, missteps by an embattled government and wishful thinking that the country's expensive and generous social welfare system can be maintained forever without big sacrifices. This is, after all, a public that has been educated by political leaders of both the right and left to distrust free market reforms.

    Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin thought he could do something for France's young when he rushed labor law changes through Parliament. His objective was to cut youth unemployment, which is about double France's national rate of 10 percent, and to show that the government had swung into action after rioting last autumn by unemployed immigrant youths.

    But the young concluded that Villepin was doing something to them, not for them. By giving private employers the right to fire workers under 26 without cause within two years of being hired, the government effectively denied younger workers labor protections that are deeply entrenched for their elders.

    That helps explain why gray-bearded academics and other seniorish citizens rushed to the streets to join Villepin's political foes and union leaders in showing support for the students. How could they, in good conscience, do otherwise?

    A broad generational conflict over the allocation of resources is taking shape in many industrial nations as their working populations age. In the United States, the profligacy of galloping budget and trade deficits has convinced many younger workers they will never have the kind of Social Security protection their parents enjoyed.

    It is time to forge new global and generational social contracts to recognize and mitigate the inequities that a new world of change fosters. By raising their voices, France's young and America's migrants have called attention to that need.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Hoagland can be reached via e-mail at jimhoagland@washpost.com.
    <div>"True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else."
    - Clarence Darrow</div>

  2. #2
    Senior Member moosetracks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    3,118
    Globalization to foreigners only means one thing...take from Americans and give to them!
    Do not vote for Party this year, vote for America and American workers!

  3. #3
    Senior Member WavTek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,431
    That article reads like a communist manifesto. Fortunately Americans have always been stronger than the French, when it comes to doing what is right.
    REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER!

  4. #4
    Senior Member patbrunz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    3,590

    Re: Globalization Changing Societal Rules

    The harsh anti-immigrant laws proposed by the U.S. House of Representatives defy not only common decency and humanity,

    Hoagland can be reached via e-mail at jimhoagland@washpost.com.

    What the hell is this idiot talking about!?!

    How does having a secure border, being a soverign nation, and expecting people immigrate legally defy common decency and humanity!?!

    This Hoaland guy is NUTS!!
    All that is necessary for evil to succeed is that good men do nothing. -Edmund Burke

  5. #5
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    I do not even know where to being with this Globalist Garbage other than to advise all to focus on the terms "societal changes".

    Changing socieites is part of "restructuring societies" and is part of Globalism and there isn't anything in it for the American People.

    Flooding our population means limited resources.

    Flooding our population means breaking the social between young and old.

    Flooding our population means you got less, they got more, and Traitors in the US Government made you give it to them.

    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  6. #6
    Senior Member Coto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,726
    http://www.cfr.org
    Globalist decisions
    -----------
    Coto

    What part of "We don't owe our jobs to India" are you unable to understand, Senator?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •