Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member cvangel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    4,450

    House Dems have agreed to an investigation on vote

    Republicans Angry Over House Vote

    By ANDREW TAYLOR
    The Associated Press
    Friday, August 3, 2007; 9:08 PM

    WASHINGTON -- House Democrats apologized Friday for wrestling what appeared to be a winning vote away from Republicans Thursday night, and on Friday evening agreed to an investigation.

    Republicans continued to steam, however, over the episode in which they appeared to be the winners by a 215-213 tally on a procedural motion designed to make sure illegal immigrants would not get certain benefits from an agriculture spending bill.

    Instead, with the tally clerk registering the final votes, Rep. Michael McNulty, D-N.Y., gaveled the vote to a close, saying the GOP measure had failed on a 214-214 tie.

    Republicans erupted, chanting "shame, shame, shame," and then walked out in protest after McNulty permitted further Democrats to switch their votes to prevail 216-212. Despite winning that tally, Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., moved for a revote as permitted under the rules, and Democrats prevailed again.

    On Friday, Hoyer apologized. "The minority was understandably angry," he said.

    Republicans prevailed upon their Democratic rivals to establish a special panel to investigate the manner in which the vote was handled.

    Meanwhile, Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, promised to try to prevent the House from considering further legislation until Democrats reverse the contested vote tally. A weekend session loomed.

    Democrats changed House rules in January to disallow the practice of holding votes open to affect the outcome. The new rule came after Republicans routinely held open votes to twist arms, including a 2003 episode on the Medicare prescription drug bill in which Republicans held a vote open for three hours until finally prevailing.

    "Never once did we in the majority attempt to steal a vote," Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va., said Friday.

    The stakes on the issue involved Thursday were far smaller. Democrats had routinely accepted comparable language on illegal immigrants on other spending bills, but the agriculture measure was being debated under fast-track conditions denying Republicans a chance to offer the provision.

    The contested provision was simply a restatement of current law, and Democrats stewed that the vote on the illegal immigrant measure was aimed chiefly at forcing swing-district Democrats into a politically bad vote.

    Also Friday, the House's electronic voting machines went haywire, causing leaders to agree to a recess so that they could be fixed.

    ___

    If lawmakers try to go on vacation this weekend without updating a law governing U.S. eavesdropping on foreigners, one option for President Bush would be to call them back.

    Bush said Friday he wanted Congress members to put off their August recess until they have passed the legislation. And although aides said it shouldn't come to this, they noted that the Constitution gives Bush authority to call Congress into session.

    He wouldn't be the first president to haul lawmakers back to the Capitol.

    According to the Senate Historical Office, presidents have called both the Senate and the House into "extraordinary" session 23 times, on such matters as war, economic crisis and crucial domestic legislation.

    The first president to do so was John Adams in 1797, to suspend relations with France. The most recent was Harry Truman, who called Congress back into session in 1947 and 1948 to deal with domestic legislation.

    Other notables: James Madison called Congress back during the War of 1812; Abraham Lincoln recalled lawmakers to deal with the secession of Southern states. And Franklin Roosevelt summoned Congress for the beginning of the New Deal.

    Article II, Section3 of the Constitution provides that the president "may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both houses, or either of them."

    ___

    Associated Press writer Laurie Kellman contributed to this report.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 74_pf.html

  2. #2
    Senior Member Paige's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Salt Lake City Utah
    Posts
    2,847
    So is this saying the Democrats still won the vote?
    <div>''Life's tough......it's even tougher if you're stupid.''
    -- John Wayne</div>

  3. #3
    Senior Member Populist's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    8,085
    A lame apology and investigation is not good enough. The initial 215-213 legit vote must stand.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •