Thread: San Francisco judge bars U.S. from enforcing Trump administration’s asylum ban

Fox & Friends

San Francisco judge bars U.S. from enforcing Trump administration’s asylum ban




Judge bars US from enforcing Trump administration’s asylum ban

By Edmund DeMarche | Fox News

Many from migrant caravan seeking asylum at US-Mexico border

What qualifies someone for asylum? Former ICE acting director and Fox News contributor Tom Homan discusses.

Video at the page link

A federal judge in San Francisco on Monday barred the Trump administration from refusing asylum to immigrants who cross the southern border illegally, likely prompting a legal challenge from the White House.
Trump issued a proclamation on Nov. 9 that said anyone who crossed the southern border would be ineligible for asylum.
U.S. District Judge Jon S. Tigar, who was nominated by President Obama in 2012 to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, issued a temporary restraining order after hearing arguments in San Francisco.
The request was made by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights, which quickly sued after President Trump issued the ban this month in response to the caravans of migrants that have started to arrive at the U.S.-Mexico border.
Baher Azmy, a lawyer for the Center for Constitutional Rights, said, "Individuals are entitled to asylum if they cross between ports of entry. It couldn't be clearer."
Migrants who cross illegally are generally arrested and often seek asylum or some other form of protection.
On Monday, the U.S. closed off northbound traffic for several hours at the busiest border crossing with Mexico to install new security barriers, and also closed one of two pedestrian crossings at the San Ysidro crossing in a move apparently aimed at preventing any mass rush of migrants across the border.
U.S. border inspectors are processing only about 100 asylum claims a day at Tijuana’s main crossing to San Diego. Asylum seekers register their names in a tattered notebook managed by migrants themselves that had more than 3,000 names even before the caravan arrived.
Fox News' Gregg Re and the Associated Press contributed to this report

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jud...QIksrKngbwTtlc

Take it to the US Supreme Court Fast or Implement Martial Law. They are Not getting in.

Put them on the travel ban now!

We cannot let millions of people breach our border.

HAVE DHS BUS THEM ALL TO THAT JUDGE'S NEIGHBORHOOD AND DUMP THEM OFF THERE!

This older video is suddenly getting more attention....we know why.
~~~

May 5, 2009

Originally Posted by Airbornesapper07

Take it to the US Supreme Court Fast . . .

The justices decide which cases they will hear, about 80 each year. They decide another 50 without hearing arguments. The cases they choose usually address constitutional issues or federal law. The Supreme Court gets about 7,000 requests to hear cases per year, so there are many cases that don't get heard.

U.S. Supreme Court | The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human ...
https://civilrights.org/judiciary/fe...supreme-court/

We've got a real problem in this country with court shopping. The ACLU and other liberal special interest groups know exactly where to file their lawsuits for the initial desired outcome. While many of these initial rulings can be overcome through the appeals process, it can be a lengthy process.