Takes Walmart how long to make $11 million?DID ANYONE GO TO JAIL?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mamie
Printable View
Takes Walmart how long to make $11 million?DID ANYONE GO TO JAIL?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mamie
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickesteves
I apologize ... Wal-Mart paid $11 million in civil fines and was not charged with criminal violations .... the contractors that actually hired the "illegal aliens" plead guilty to criminal charges and paid $4 million in fines
assistant secretary for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Michael J. Garcia, said
"We plan to use this settlement as a model for future cases and efforts in work-site enforcement"
People will pay fines and be glad to do so.Jail is something most people hate,even for 1 minute.
The Mexican man went to jail. That was allegedly under State law. Arrested for being Mexican.
That is worth some consideration in the light of the USC in itself. Would the policeman arrest me in New Hampshire because I am from Colorado? No. So the policeman has obviously traversed venues in the arrest inferring the complaint is coming from the United States, not New Hampshire.
Any attorney in a black robe will be fairly amused at the crosstalk. The policeman should have called in the feds who would have told him to leave the Mexican alone. Unlike Wal-Mart or whatever, I doubt the Mexican's pockets were deep enough to fleece.
The local municipal policeman has no authority to speak for the United States, or complain for the United States. The case should fall apart for lack of formation if the Mexican man does not cop a plea (plead guilty).
Regards,
David Merrill.
P.S. See waiver of tort. Settling a criminal indictment with a bill for monetary compensation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidMerrill
a policeman could not arrest you for being in another state, because you are protected under the Constitution because "The citizens of each state shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states" -- an "illegal alien" is neither a citizen nor a "legal immigrant" so there is no privilege or immunity under the Constitution
under the Constitution "The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion" -- under their "republican form of government" it seems the state or local government can charge an "illegal alien" that is a criminal under federal law with trespassing and the federal government can't
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickesteves
the reason Wal-Mart wasn't charged for criminal violations was they said they didn' t know their 'subcontractors' had hired illegals ... but I wonder if the contractors themselves are going to have jail time ...
Don't you see? You are quoting the US Constitution.
A local police officer has no prosecution against Mexicans. He should have called the feds for an immigration problem. The policeman spoke for the United States; not New Hampshire. But he used the wrong body of law to prosecute for the United States. He used the State of New Hampshire's RSA 635.2.
In admiralty - the 2" gold fringes are the notice "law of the flag" criminal penalties may be applied to breach of contract. That is why neither the RSA or the USC Title 8 are law. They are just guidelines for civil complaints.Quote:
the reason Wal-Mart wasn't charged for criminal violations was they said they didn' t know their 'subcontractors' had hired illegals ... but I wonder if the contractors themselves are going to have jail time ...
I am not familiar with the case. But it is likely since Wal-Mart was able to fork out large amounts of cash to settle, nobody gets jailed. The contractors are workers like you and me. They will likely be left alone. The Wal-Mart settlement alleviated pursuit. There is an overriding penumbra of fiduciary responsibility - jailing or fining productive contractors is unproductive.
Regards,
David Merrill.
Mamie,Quote:
Originally Posted by Mamie
I believe a much more sinister reason exists for Wal-Mart not being charged with criminal conduct?
Did you know they contribute to La Raza? Did you know our current attorney general, Alberto Gonzales, is a card-carrying member of a La Raza affiliate and he had the outright nerve to thank La Raza in a speech to the group for helping him along the way. Search La Raza or Gonzales and you'll find several interesting posts that will probably make you :evil: as heck!
We not only are being invaded from south of the border by the poorest of the poor, but we are being invaded in the "upper ranks" as well and that makes me :evil: :!:
that's the part I don't get -- there is no Constitutional provision to protect "illegal invaders" from state or local laws ...Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidMerrill
It is becoming clear to me why I am so annoying to some of the people here. I have been trying to equip you with an accurate system model and you are just ventilating. For instance the above clip does nothing to invoke anger in me. It is just the way big business works.Quote:
As Texas Supreme Court Justice
GONZALES DOES ENRON'S BIDDING: As an elected member of the Texas Supreme Court, "Enron and Enron's law firm were Gonzales's biggest contributors," giving him $35,450 in 2000. Overall, Gonzales raked in $100,000 from the energy industry. In May 2000, "Gonzales was author of a state Supreme Court opinion that handed the energy industry one of its biggest Texas legal victories in recent history." Since Bush brought him into the White House, Gonzales has worked doggedly to keep secret the details of energy task force meetings held by Vice President Cheney. [New York Daily News, 2/2/02]
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... peline.wmv
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... action.wmv
President/businessman
Examine George Walker's face while he is digesting the second airplane attack on the World Trade Center. Ignore the narrator's speculations about what he is thinking. To me, he is calculating - like a businessman. He is making entry of the new development into a larger business plan.
My concern is that you must drop all the emotionalism to get a picture of the system(s) before you can be effective. Of course the Internet is a great place to ventilate. Mr. Magoo threatened to erase every Post I have made here, simply because I am not spouting the 'party line' as he understands it.
Regards,
David Merrill.
P.S. Mamie. That is why the policeman was required to call the feds. Now as a private party or the New Hampshire attorney general could sue the Mexican in federal court under this Title 8 provision. But that is not going to happen. Earlier I kept bringing up these "illegal immigrants" are collecting valid claims on (trade) the account deficit. There is no federal cause against them for being here. Attorneys always go for the deep pockets like Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart simply got caught on the wrong side of Title 8 policy guidelines for a civil suit. Since they could not argue their way out of it, they settled. It is likely that the contractors still have those same foreign employees.
Understand I am just a guy out there with a keyboard and probably too much time on my hands. But I throw my two cents in that this will go away and people will be wiser than to try to prosecute misusing improper laws while crosstalking a complaint into somebody else's mouth. In this case a municipal police chief grabbing revised state statutes to complain about a Mexican man for the United States. It is not likely to get into any court. Unless the man plead out guilty and paid the fine it is already history. David Brooks has likely been told to leave the whole mess be. He has other stories to pursue I would hope.Quote:
From the article:
Immigration law is generally a federal matter that doesn’t come under the jurisdiction of local police departments. But Chamberlain has often expressed frustration with the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in the past.
It’s not clear whether courts will allow police to prosecute people for crossing international borders by using a law more commonly applied to domestic disputes. Because Ramirez was not indoors, the criminal trespass is a violation, a level of severity less than a misdemeanor. (emphasis mine)
David,
I'm beginning to wonder what your "party line" is? :wink:
Perhaps if you'd speak plainly for those of us who aren't rocket scientists???????
And finally, WHAT DO YOUR POINTS HAVE TO DO WITH ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION????????
From what "platform" are you speaking ... you're not from one of those many "fringe" groups, are ya? :wink: :?:
Pretty good pun. About the 2" fringes.
I am explaining the history and facts. You can start looking for the fringes around you. That is broadswipe Executive powers of necessity and what is curious is you are almost definitely going to notice the fringes in the church sanctuary next Sunday morning. That should get you wondering...
Then you can start to wonder, "What is going on? These fringes are all over the place?! Is this some kind of a fringe group? Church. Court. Even private corporations are all notifying me about something.... WHAT?"
This is more directly about police chief Chamberlain's ongoing complaint the feds do nothing about Mexicans on streetcorners. He even pulled a local trespassing law to arrest a Mexican for the United States. Technically that's just nuts. Frustrated people do nutty things. I understand why the feds do nothing. I have been explaining that.Quote:
You ask:
And finally, WHAT DO YOUR POINTS HAVE TO DO WITH ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION????????
Regards,
David Merrill.
Never mind, David .. I see evasion and talking in riddles are your "talking points."
I'm off .. to more conducive conversations and some lunch.
Oh... one final thing .. are you, in all these ramblings, trying to make a point for globalism?
Understand I am just a guy out there with a keyboard and probably too much time on my hands. But I throw my two cents in that this will go away and people will be wiser than to try to prosecute misusing improper laws while crosstalking a complaint into somebody else's mouth. In this case a municipal police chief grabbing revised state statutes to complain about a Mexican man for the United States. It is not likely to get into any court. Unless the man plead out guilty and paid the fine it is already history. David Brooks has likely been told to leave the whole mess be. He has other stories to pursue I would hope.[/quote:vjhnyc88]Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidMerrill
Prof. Merrill is offering a free course here;in a place like Utah for instance,you may have to pay for his opinion.
Dear Rickey Lynn;
Exactly. And I am being paid to write here. I have been transparent about that from the start a few days ago.
Regards,
David Merrill.
P.S. Watchman; Your point about globalism. You might evade the gold fringes all you want. That does not mean they are not out there. I do not see why you make it so tough as to compare it to rocket science. Look for them - schools, board rooms, hotels etc. They are all over the place. They are reserved for the President by code. For the Commander-in-Chief acting for the Army and the Navy.
You're being PAID to write here? How so? Hmmm ... wonder what Mr. Gheen will think of that?Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidMerrill
None of us are paid!
Is Mr. Gheen Mr. Magoo?
I think you misunderstood. If you are getting nothing out of being here, why do you have so many stars?
This kind of information is good as gold. To get feedback on how ready people are to breakthrough that paradigm shift. To understand these fringes all around for one thing. To understand why the "illegal immigrants" have a valid claim here. To understand why the feds will do nothing about Mexicans on streetcorners.
Understanding this all is what I do. You are paying me. Hopefully I am repaying some of you. As I see it, your only objective is to get the feds to do something about what you perceive to be "illegal" immigrants; not to understand why they will not. As I see it you better try understanding the "problem".
Regards,
David Merrill.
No, Mr. Gheen owns the forum and has final say on its content.Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidMerrill
My stars ... because I've contributed many articles to the database .. almost 1500.
How am I "paying" you? <scratchin' head on this one>
All these extemporaneous issues are moot. We're not interested in pyramids, paradigm shifts or hypotheses.
That's perhaps a polite way to say that I don't think the majority of the forum members are interested in your theories. :lol: Sorry about that .. our focus is much more defined.
We're INTERESTED and COMMITTED to stopping the INVASION OF AMERICA!
Here's a little research for you in your research. It's clear who the "illegal aliens" are. I think your lobby for your "view" of things will be overlooked by the majority.
Have a nice day!
Definitions of Illegal Alien on the Web:
A foreigner who has either entered a country illegally (eg without inspection or proper documents) or who has violated the terms of legal admission to the country (eg by overstaying the duration of a tourist or student visa).
Also known as an "Undocumented Alien," is an alien who has entered the United States illegally and is deportable if apprehended, or an alien who entered the United States legally but who has fallen "out of status" and is deportable.
www.irs.gov/businesses/small/internatio ... 36,00.html
Aliens not lawfully admitted for permanent residence. These aliens may be known or unknown in INS but are not in a satisfactory status with INS.
info.dhhs.state.nc.us/olm/manuals/doa/sa/man/SA3000-01.htm
An illegal alien is an individual who enters a country at a place other than a designated port-of-entry, in violation of that country's laws.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_alien
You're trying to create a paradigm shiftQuote:
This kind of information is good as gold. To get feedback on how ready people are to breakthrough that paradigm shift
:P ...that's fairly obvious :wink:Quote:
Originally Posted by 2ndamendsis
No, not create it. Gather information about a paradigm shift already occuring. And through the clutter, even people who speak out against it, I gather intelligence. That intelligence is worth money.
For instance you have just admitted that you do not care about why. You will not verify hard fact and solid history because it agrees with somebody (me) whom you disagree with. Well... very well. But that is good information. See? I cannot go into a forum like this hoping for one outcome or another. That is not scientific.
I think it may have been Mr. Gheen who eloquently summed up what I was portraying as foreign claims on American soil. There are many other sources of information, primarily the federal repository down the street. But this works well to supplement a profile. I should be careful not to offend you enough to get you expelled from the forum. But that is just because I have seen that happen too many times.
There will be no presumption on my part that you speak for a vast majority of readers here. I know there are many who would like this to be a ventilator ground to release inert gas about illegal immigration. And I have confirmed before you that at least one Reader comprehends my Posts properly in gist.
Of course you do not like the state of affairs; especially with the feds doing nothing but standing ready to quash a Minuteman vigilante group if necessary. (Necessary being the moment they actually harm a Mexican national.)
About globalism. Well that would not be very scientific of me either now would it? To come in here spouting globalism. I will tell you this - the gold fringe is the flag. It means the same thing in any debtor nation of the world. The Secretary, endowed with Presidential banking powers is the US Governor for the IMF. Meaning an officer appointed to manage the national debt of the US. The IMF is an organ of the United Nations.
I don't think you will find Kofi Annan approving of arresting a man for simply being Mexican. He probably would say something like, "Do unto others what you wish they would do unto you."
So we will see. I have linked David Brooks here and maybe he is reading. I doubt being a journalist he is allowed to write freely in chats but hopefully he will let us know about any subsequent articles and developments.
Regards,
David Merrill.
Who is David Brooks?
Please save me the Google since you obviously know.
Point blank ...are you attempting to discredit us because we don't share your views.
That's not very nice, ya know! :lol:
He is the author of this Topic news article.
http://www.alipac.us/article361.html
Your credentials speak for themselves. Whether you agree with me or not. But that is a good point about intelligence.
For instance Mr. Magoo came in and spoke up as a Moderator because he does not like my points of view. Fine. But I have seen a lot of people who feel snuggled up in Private emails (PMs) that they step forward with no real authority or sway. I have a feeling if Mr. Magoo had the mouse-power to delete me he already would have.
But here is the catch. If the owner of the site understands my Posts, then he is also enjoying the intelligence. And so are a lot of readers. I am certain there are readers who just kind of soak it in, maybe even verify a few things and feel maybe they understand illegal immigration in a more contemporary light. That macroeconomics and energy management (wealth) are crucial to why a Mexican man on a New Hampshire streetcorner poses a threat to well... let's admit it, people like you.
Regards,
David Merrill.
P.S. But then again maybe the owner will wipe me from this Topic.
whose credentials .. how so?Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidMerrill
I'll refer to the article you cite.
EDIT...THAT David Brooks? Baaaa hahahahahahahahaha! I believe he's the reporter who only REPORTED the news. I'm on a fast track here... doing many things at once .. but reporters don't analyze the news of how and why an event occurred .. they write it up .. or didn't you know that?
Quote:
The article begins:
4/19/2005
By DAVID BROOKS
Nashua Telegraph
Topics: Illegal immigration, local laws, law enforcement, crimes, Americans, security
So I am a little confused you would debate that he is the author.
I guess I can live with David Brooks is the reporter.
David,
I must confess that I am not enjoying your posts for two reasons. One, my work schedule no longer allows me to read many of the posts here.
Two, your posts are very difficult to follow and understand what you are driving at. You are alarming some of our forum watchdogs because it is hard for many of us to fathom where you are coming from on all this.
We want to protect free speech on this board, but we have had many cases of people trying to cause trouble here in the boards. I ask that you please do two things.
One, please stop linking off site to websites that may contain information that is not consistant with the goals of ALIPAC. Two, please try not to offend our users. Your posts are causing some headaches and if you are here to contribute to the discussion that is fine.
If you are here to try and recruit people to your beliefs off the topic of illegal immigration or if you are being paid to be here. Please desist.
Regards,
William
I believe you have summarized my perspective well as of the other day.
That is basically that "illegal immigration" is somewhat mythological in nature. That also explains the article exhibiting frustration by a New Hampshire chief of police that the feds are for whatever reason inert about the problem. Factoring in macroeconomics clarifies why. I am aware that it takes a little time for concepts like the admiralty fringes and Bankers' Holiday to gel. Especially when a few watchdogs are busy barking up a storm.
I have a fairly accurate profile now. This has been helpful. I get paid for my intellectual properties and therefore appreciate the contribution.
Regards,
David Merrill.
A little of bit of info on David.
First let's look at a few of the links he has posted, and what they have in common:
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... sitory.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... sement.wmv
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... tagram.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... ixture.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... nippet.wmv
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... _a_row.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... e_grid.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... biking.wmv
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... apter1.pdf
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... apter2.pdf
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... apter3.pdf
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... _bills.wmv
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... le_R4C.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... Decree.rtf
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... rHotel.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... arters.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... arters.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... Center.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... _METRO.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... ation1.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... ation2.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... ation3.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... peline.wmv
http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... action.wmv
First impression is that in order to have that number of links under your name you must have some controlling interest in that web site. Web search shows the web site ownership is hidden by proxy. the web page home page is an advertisement for an alternative electric company in Texas. Gee whiz there bud, if you wish to be so forthcoming why hide your identity?
Next, the sub index at that web site: http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/ is very revealing. It is a list of links to every conspiracy nutball group in the country. The very first link goes to a page that says the US is still a Colony of England!
Many links to common law courts. Funny it does not mention that every time this common law tactic has been used in a courtroom, the user has ended up in jail for a rather long stay.
I feel it vital to at this time issue a Disclaimer:
The words and views of David Merrill are not the views of Americans for Legal Immigration PAC. The posts of David Merrill should only be viewed for their entertainment value.
David, above you have claimed to be paid to post here. I am asking you directly; Is one of the Open Border groups providing you with any means of compensation to post here as a way to discredit the good name of this PAC? If so, which group is so funding your actions. If not, why do you persist in this fantasy that any one here believes your nonsense.
Most of the drivel you have posted to date here is masked references to common law court theory, or the theory that the US is held in bondage to the world bankers as part of a conspiracy. The only whackjob theory you have not mentioned is the Protocals of the Elders of Zion.
Your common law tactic did not work for the Montana Freeman, and they did not work for the Republic of Texas folks any better. They will not work here either, period.
I venture to guess that I am the only one around here who even knows my identity. And that I have been transparent about except that I had to redact my true name down to one word and chose "DavidMerrill" rather than "David_Merrill". But I am the only Poster here I am sure who is using his true name.Quote:
Gee whiz there bud, if you wish to be so forthcoming why hide your identity?
The intelligence that is worth money is to evaluate 1) how representative Mr. Magoo and other "watchdogs" are. And 2) why intelligent people would rather just squalk about illegal immigration than understand it. I have various libraries linked about, some of which I have never visited the homepage.
Regards,
David Merrill.
P.S. Mr. Magoo; I am not answerable to you. Like any watchdog I consider you an energy accountant. I have seen watchdogs and nobody has ever actually come through the door swinging a bat or anything but just the same, the dog understands there is only enough energy for the family. At least that is a vestigial pack instinct from the wilderness days. They do not comprehend the bigger picture of civilized culture so they bark at something without understanding it might be the pizza delivery boy actually bringing nourishment into the household.
I have no intention of disputing the facts I have presented. You continually infer secondary conclusions instead of the basic facts.
Well, GUFFAW! (regarding using real names rather than nicknames .. haven't you heard, DavidMerrill ... most people post under a nickname on a bulletin board ... gee, I've been known as "furrball"). We have nothing to hide BECAUSE WE'RE NOT HERE FOR OUR PERSONAL AGENDA! In other words, our views parallel the goals and mission of ALIPAC. We're non-descript citizens fed up with what illegal immigration is doing to our country. Since we have no "agenda" other than that, we don't have to use our real names to push our agendas, studies, articles, theories, etc. etc. etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidMerrill
Imagine that!
Now come on David Merrill, you're insulting us thinking we're so stupid that we don't see the connection between you posting under your real name so you can push your agenda.
I'm not buying it and thanks, Magoo, for the disclaimer!
what do you mean by that? are we, the people that are opposed to "illegal aliens" the squalkers? and what is there to understand?Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidMerrill
Watchman;
And get a look on your driver license. Is that your name?
What I am saying is that without the macroeconomic foundation you will not understand chief Chamberlain's complaints about the feds doing nothing. These attacks at me explaining that infrastructure to you indicate you would rather just hope complaining on a website will get something done.Quote:
Mamie inquired:
what do you mean by that? are we, the people that are opposed to "illegal aliens" the squalkers? and what is there to understand?
And Mr. Magoo; the reason I continue getting paid for my intellectual property is because it really does work.
Regards,
David Merrill.
This is becoming a waste of my time. What you don't know, don't care to know and probably will discount in a condescending manner is that non-descript citizens are willing to fight for our country and we are mad as double l hockey sticks about the illegal invasion.
The sleeping giant is waking up and sites like ALIPAC and projects like MinuteMen are serving their established purpose.
If you think we're just venting, then you don't know Mr. Gheen and his accomplishments in his home state.
Now ... who hasn't do their homework.
I'd suggest we all stop replying to Mr. Merrill .. he's just looking for fodder for his theories. Let's not supply him any more. :roll:
See? That is exactly what I am talking about. You think the Bankers' Holiday is a "theory"? Do you think the gold fringes are an urban myth?
That is what I am trying to understand here. What is it that is so contradictory about facts and history to whatever the mission statement is around this website?
There is some kind of perspective problem. Citizens of the United States have filled the shoes of the illegal immigrants (German Nationals) of 1917 since 1933. That really seems to be the problem. I think maybe that is what has not sunk in very well yet. You are an illegal immigrant in the eyes of the feds (agents of the foreign Treasury). That makes a very interesting equation in itself.
But you do not seem to care if I prove that until next Thursday right from the Congressional, Federal Reserve bulletins and even from The Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt. You do not seem to fathom that keeping these people out of the country is dishonest banking practices because of a growing account deficit with our Chinese and Mexican neighbors. This 'denial' is very interesting and I am sure quite detrimental to about any cause.
Regards,
David Merrill.
P.S. Is that it then? Forget that we owe others. We can fight for this country back and forget about the account deficit? That is why a couple of you just want to turn a blind eye on obligations. No wonder kidnapping Americans is turning into a major Mexican industry. You think ignoring facts and history is going to make this allright?
Everyone!
I have re-read this board and find some clues that may be helpful to our achieving the mission of: compelling our government to enforce US immigration law, prosecute all violators and return aliens to the country of origin.
I believe what David Merrill is trying to say is with respect to the later two of prosecuting all violators and returning aliens to the country of origin are major taks to achieve because of the powes and forces behind the problem that led to it.
Some believe there is a conspiracy on the part of the government to dissolve the United States and one means to achieve that was over-populating the United States in a manner that reduced the standard of living of American Citizens; created excessive unemployment in certain strategic areas; resulting in a large welfare state of Americans; with foreign nationals running our businesses while we await a modest government check in the mail to buy food and keep the lights on.
Some believe that the present national debt controlled by foreign entities is part of the means by which to control the property and assets placed as collateral against those loans which would be our gold presently in the custody of the Federal Reserve System and all other properties belonging to the United States and the people of the United States who may like any debtor decide to call is due and not extend the terms of the debt.
Some believe that due to the present personal debt the largest in American History creates a similar issue for individual citizens at the same time that the government debt is the largest in American History.
Citizens pay the government debt. Citizens pay their own debt. Citizens pay both the government and their personal debt. Citizens pay government debt with taxes on income and their personal debt with the remainder of the income after taxes are paid. Unemployed citizens do not have income. As this number rises simultaneously with interest rates over time more and more citizens will not have income to pay either. There are very few nest eggs; rainy day funds for such "rainy days" because while both government and personal debt has increased dramaticaly to the highest levels in American History, savings have declined to their lowest level in American History.
The key reason for the high government debt and the high personal debt and the low personal savings is illegal immigration that has kept millions of Americans out of work; kept wages depressed while the cost of living has increased with energy costs, inflation of real estate, fuel prices, medical costs, medical insurance costs, and local and state taxes which in most areas across the country have increased every year.
The paradigm is: the cost of living and the financial burdens of American Citizens has increased dramatically while their earnings have declined. This is a spiral downward, for the worse, and represents a total decline in the American Economy. A "few" illegal immigrants would not cause this condition. "Massive" illegal immigration causes this condition. It has been allowed by our government with full and complete knowlege of the consequences on the American People.
What has happened is not a natural event. It has been devised, calculated and until now kept secret. The ONLY way this could have happened was through a complete abandonment of laws passed by Congress many years ago to prevent it. To prevent it simply required the diligent performance of the Executive Branch to execute and enforce American Law. It has done the contrary, the exact opposite, to achieve the present condition of the United States.
For What Purpose?
This did not happen out of stupidity.
This did not happen out of neglect.
This did not happen out of miscalculation.
This happened on purpose.
Why?
We been sold out.
Who are the entities that will gain from this.
We know:
Ford Foundation financed the beginning of La Raza.
Kelloggs advises and supports La Raza.
The new Secretary of Commerce is Carolos Gutierrez, supposedly born in Cuba, came to US on a holiday, thereafter his family "settled" in Mexico City, the capital of Mexico, the city where Vincente Fox is most of the time. Gutierrez worked for KELLOGG'S in Mexico City, started out as a truck driver and in 10 years was running the ENTIRE MEXICAN BUSINESS. We know how business is conducted in Mexico. 15 years later, he is running the entire KELLOGG COMPANY.
Is he educated? Where did he go to school? What theory of business, theory of politics, theory of socio-economics did he learn or subscribe to. Why become a United States Citizen and move to Mexico City to work at what? Driving a truck? Why would any family leave the United States to move to Mexico City where the best opportunity for their son was to "drive a truck"?
He did an amazing job as CEO for Kelloggs? How did he achieve that? How were these remarkable earnings achieved? Illegal labor? Outsourcing operations? Expanded international markets? Genetically modified grain research? It is an amazing story....with so little known about the man.
We need information on Carlos Guiterrez. As Secretary of Commerce, he holds a very powerful position in the United States regarding all business matters. My belief is that his allegiance would be or could be to the nation that promoted him, which was not the United States, but the nation of Mexico, where he actually grew up and became successful while IN MEXICO, not the United States.
The connection between Kelloggs, La Raza and Gutierrez is very disturbing to me not to mention the Ford Foundation's role in establishing and financing through 501 C 3 status, the National Council of La Raza.
There is also a link between Alberto Gonzales and La Raza. I'm trying to find it. We know they are close, but I believe closer than the reports would indicate.
The President of La Raza used the term in a press release concerning the recent passing of a civil rights leader named Rodolfo "Corky" Gonzales, "I stand on the shoulders of" referring to Gonzales and other civil rights leaders of the day (late 60's and 70's). Alberto's parents are Maria and Pablo Gonzales so no direct relationship unless a relative.
Alberto Gonazales when speaking to La Raza this year at an awards ceremony, said "I stand on the shoulders of" referrng to La Raza.
"I stand on the shoulders of".
Twice found--La Raza about the death this month April 05 of Roldofo "Corky" Gonzales and Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States TO La Raza in March of 2005.
Coincidence or another piece of the puzzle.
United States Senator Ken Salazar from Colorado was asked by Alberto Gonzales to make favorable comments at Gonzales confirmation hearing. When reporters asked about their relationship. they were "mild acquaintances."
Rodolfo "Corky" Gonzales was buried in Colorado.
Rueben Salazar was involved in this Chicano Movement and shot by a police officer. Rueben Salazar was from Colorado.
Jose Angel Gutierrez, founder of La Raza Unidas and Rudolfo "Corky" Gonzales fought for control of the Chicano Movement in Dallas in the 1972.
Guiterrez prevailed and Corky returned to Colorado.
Is this coincidence or a piece to the puzzle.
Salazar, Gonzales, and Guiterrez.
All famous names from the Chicano Movement all from Texas and Colorado--all tied to the National Council of La Raza.
Question: Why would Gonzales aske a junior Senator from Colorado, Ken Salazar, with whom he barely knows to appear at his Confirmation Hearings before the United States Senate Judiciary Committee for Attorney General of the United States?
Question: What does the phrase "I stand on the shoulders of" mean? Is this a common phrase among Chicanos? I've never heard it before in my life and now I've seen it twice: once by La Raza about Corky Gonzales and once to La Raza by Alberto Gonzales.
Is it possible that these three men were members of the Chicano Youth Movement and this phrase "I stand on the shoulders of" is part of their code of the organization. Are these three men the proteges of this La Raza movement whose goal then and now is to re-take the Southwest Territory of the United States for Mexico as Aztlan?
David, you are referring to a time in history where immigration was needed and immigrants welcome to perform work and develop new territories. There are no new territories. Our society is not in a development phase. It is in a "maintenance" phase. Some call this a sustainable phase. In a sustanable or maintenance phase, illegal immigration does not contribute, it drains. Our society is being drained by illegal immigration which has caused national and personal debts to rise and well-bring to decline.
There is no benefit to the Treasury of illegal immigration.
There is no benefit to the economy of illegal immigration.
There is no benefit to off-shore entities holding our debt, UNLESS their intention is to take control of our country!
See?
If they are involved in this massive illegal immigration into the United States, which its destructive consequences, then this fits a piece of the puzzle into it.
And they will be held accountable. Destroying the maintenance level of a society as a back door means to gain political power through massive violations of law in the United States will not fly here and anyone who thinks that is possible has made a miscalculation.
Go away for a few days and hell breaks loose! Well Mr. Merrill, personally, when I go fishing, I like to catch something tasty. Personally, I don't care much for barracudas. Nor do I like slimy, stinky bait.
Yawn, maybe you should throw your line elsewhere.
Dear Judy;
If that were the case, there would be no immigration, legal or not. Why do they want to come here if there is nothing to gain? They are coming here for an impoved way of life. However I would not credit it as a Mexican takeover of America. More like a collections process. Like I have indicated, America has not been what people think of her since at least 1933. There was quite a bit of dissent about the New Deal in action, but not so much as to say we have been sold out. And as far as it being secret - not true. Albeit most people have no federal repository handy.
And I am saying that happened - Treasury takeover - back in March of 1933. Need proof? For one, Title 12 U.S.C. §§95a-b. Look how the Secretary has as much power as the President. Americans had to turn in their gold and gold certificates. People were accused of hoarding.Quote:
Like you say:
There is no benefit to off-shore entities holding our debt, UNLESS their intention is to take control of our country!
I have been addressing the very narrow scope of police chief Chamberlain's complaints about the federal government being so inert and unresponsive to complaints.
Regards,
David Merrill.
Dear David,
The immigrants come on the BELIEF that their lives will be better. For some, this is true. For some, compared to the types of jobs and pay in their country, this creates a new opportunity for them compared to what they have. They are not Americans. Their objective is personal. They come, steal a job from an American. They now have income at the expense of the American. In their mind, they've pulled a "fast one". Just like a pick-pocket. The illegals are not here for any reason other than to increase their personal income. Increasing their personal income compared to Mexico at lower rates than Americans, has now dropped the national wage and salary index or wealth and prosperity index of the United States. Illegal immigrants don't care about the future of the United States or the American People, because they owe allegiance to their Homeland.
That is why they are alien and not under the jurisdiction of the United States. They are under the jurisdiction of foreign governments. I suppose to take this line abit further, they are under the control and direction of foreign governments to whom they have clear allegiance, legally and culturally.
They are not contributing as proponents claim, they are draining the nation of the United States for their own personal gain and to the benefit of foreign governments encouraging massive migration to the United States for this sole purpose.
What is going on has nothing to do with the individual immigrant, they are merely pawns in the plan to demise the United States and break the will of the American People.
The argument of what is legal with respect to immigration is directed solely by US Immigration Law which is very clear. We are a sovereign nation and who we allow into the United States is our sovereign right and our sovereign right alone. No other country has any role in this matter, not Mexico, nor any member of the UN, nor any Official at the UN.
We are closed to outsiders until such time as we grant permission to enter. That is the law and has been the law in the United States.
If business interests wish to increase migration into the United States, the only legal means by which they do it is to have increases approved by the United States Congress, subject to the Will of the American People.
Business interests have circumvented this process.
Government has allowed them to circumvent this process.
Foreign governments knowing that the US Government has abandoned the Rule of Law encourage their citizens to migrate to the United States.
They have chosen the path of infiltration over confrontation.
Proponents of illegal Immigration have no interest in the immigrants, only their COLLECTIVE NUMBERS to effect an infiltration of foreign nationals imbedded deep in our society for political purposes.
The massive illegal immigration into the United States has nothing to with improving the US Economy, the opposite occurs and everyone in power knows that; has nothing to do with improving the lives of Americans or the immigrants, the proponents could care less about both. It has only to do with changing the political power of the United States.
That is both indisputable and irrefutable.
Dear Judy;
For the most part I agree but without any spin like they "steal" a job from an American. They have come here to increase their personal income but if you were them, likely you would be tempted too. Now what you may not remember was years before we started using the term "account deficit" we used "trade deficit". It is nothing new. I remember how cool it was back in high school, to get down to Mexico and come back with the car loaded with great stuff for dirt cheap.Quote:
The immigrants come on the BELIEF that their lives will be better. For some, this is true. For some, compared to the types of jobs and pay in their country, this creates a new opportunity for them compared to what they have. They are not Americans. Their objective is personal. They come, steal a job from an American. They now have income at the expense of the American. In their mind, they've pulled a "fast one". Just like a pick-pocket. The illegals are not here for any reason other than to increase their personal income. Increasing their personal income compared to Mexico at lower rates than Americans, has now dropped the national wage and salary index or wealth and prosperity index of the United States. Illegal immigrants don't care about the future of the United States or the American People, because they owe allegiance to their Homeland.
So I like the points you make, but they are very American biased. To me they make my point quite well. Americans have been getting four or more things from others and only giving back two or three. When there was confidence in the dollar and its dominance over the peso that never really manifest in problems. And that was when the feds enforced illegal immigration code.
So I will not repeat myself about the account deficit. But the Federal Reserve is talking about it every few days lately. And that usually means something is going to develop. For sure it explains why the feds are more wary about MinuteMen than illegal aliens.
Exactly. What I have been saying is that what you call government has been the Treasury since 1933.Quote:
Business interests have circumvented this process.
Government has allowed them to circumvent this process.
That is not positive law. It is colorable law. That was my reference to the inside cover of any USCA code book. That event was March 28, 1861 and since then the Congress is only convened under the "extraordinary occasions" clause of the Constitution. Not a de jure Congress.Quote:
We are closed to outsiders until such time as we grant permission to enter. That is the law and has been the law in the United States.
If business interests wish to increase migration into the United States, the only legal means by which they do it is to have increases approved by the United States Congress, subject to the Will of the American People.
Regards,
David Merrill.