Thread: An Illegal Alien just cost Meg Whitman 119 Million Dollars!

An Illegal Alien just cost Meg Whitman 119 Million Dollars!

The Town Crier



Translation: "No on Prop 187 and No on the Law in Arizona."
An actual Meg Whitman for Governor Campaign sign.

You've probably heard that Billionaire Meg has spent 119 MILLION dollars of her own money trying to become governor of California; the highest amount spent to date by a candidate. You should know by now that she's a pro illegal alien advocate and a disciple of John McCain.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0910/42457.html
http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/search?q=Meg+Whitman

Today, courtesy of the slimy, democrat/Jerry Brown loving lawyeress Gloria Allred we hear that for nine years Meg hired an illegal alien as a nanny/housekeeper. The insinuation is that she fired the nanny only to not be found out because of her run for governor and the poor 'migrant' claims of 'mistreatment'. .....at $23.00 per hour!!!
(Gosh, Meg, plenty of us Californian NATIVES would like a job that paid that much!)
http://www.3news.co.nz/Whitman-allegedl ... fault.aspx

Mistreated? Write that one off...EVERY illegal alien believes they are 'mistreated' in the USA!

Dismissed for political expediency? Stranger things happen every day.

Well, we don't know yet if those charges are true. But anyone should be able to realize a couple of facts from what we do know.

1. Whitman is too dumb to be a governor if, in NINE years, she didn't know this woman was an illegal alien. (And Jerry Brown is NO better!)

2. Whitman has a history of pandering to the Hispanic lobby and not giving a WHIT for the rule of law, even going so far to denounce the people's vote for California's proposition 187 and opposing Arizona's SB1070.
http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/search?q=Meg+Whitman

Why is a poorly educated, limited English speaker preferred in her home to care for her children instead of a CALIFORNIAN who needs the job???

The elitists prefer them, that's why.
But why???
When the threat of deportation hangs over an alien's head, it's easier to get them to 'comply'. If their English is limited and they can't read, all the better, they'll know less of their boss's business.
Why hire a hard headed AMERICAN who might just tell someone what a phony they work for???

Today, The OC Register has some fascinating analysis in their article, Who wins, loses from mass immigration to California? Political Elitists like Meg Whitman is who!
...until today .... her beloved illegal alien might just cost her the election.

http://www.ocregister.com/news/-267327--.html

[snips]'CHEAP MAIDS AND NANNIES' - Immigrants' effect on the California lifestyle - No state and almost no developed economy has absorbed so many immigrant workers so quickly as California. The arrival of more than 5 million foreign workers over the past four decades raises a basic question: Who wins, and who loses?

The biggest gainers from immigration may be middle- and upper-class natives, particularly women. Immigration has helped make cheap personal services a common feature of middle-class life in California.

University of Chicago economist Patricia Cortes found that prices for housekeeping, gardening, child care and other services fell during the 1980s and '90s in cities where many low-skilled immigrants settled.

As a result women with professional or doctoral degrees spent more time at work. In economic terms, it's a simple tradeoff: A female physician, lawyer or professor earns more money by hiring someone else to clean her house, do her laundry or care for her children.
.... the more schooling a woman had, the more likely she was to hire domestic help. About 3 percent of women with high school diplomas hired housekeepers; the rate rose to 15 percent of women with a college degree and 25 percent of those with graduate degrees.

Meg Whitman's admiration for Obama's point man, socialist radical Van Jones should have been enough to turn off ALL republicans during the primary!

Meg Whitman: "I’m A Huge Fan Of Van Jones.......Van Jones Is ‘Doing a Marvelous Job’"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSn37TMXZO8

Now we are left with dumb and dumber to vote for, except for ONE!

Source: http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/2010/ ... itman.html

Brown or Whitless


Whats the difference

Originally Posted by Justthefacts

Brown or Whitless


Whats the difference

Translation: "No on Prop 187 and No on the Law in Arizona."
An actual *R-E-P-U-B-L-I-C-A-N* Meg Whitman for Governor Campaign sign.

Karma is indeed sweet! Whitman has been pandering to illegal invaders since day one and now one of her beloved illegal invaders has turned on her personally.

Don't be too upset meg, as this is what these criminals do best! When will these politicians learn that pandering to this volatile group will not endear them to you!

Actually Meg Whitman just cost Meg Whitman 119 Million Dollars.

Whitman thinks Prop. 187 is/was unfair, so in my opinion she got what she deserves.

Can't the GOP give us anything better than this?! Geezzzzzzzz!

Originally Posted by GoodOleDays

Can't the GOP give us anything better than this?! Geezzzzzzzz!

=====================================

EASY ANSWER: NO!

"When will these politicians learn that pandering to this volatile group will not endear them to you!"

They won't....until its too late. They all pander to this group and it will cost them dearly. This "group" hates them and will destroy them as soon as they acquire enough power. Politicians are too stupid to know this.

Originally Posted by NoBueno

Karma is indeed sweet! Whitman has been pandering to illegal invaders since day one and now one of her beloved illegal invaders has turned on her personally.

Don't be too upset meg, as this is what these criminals do best! When will these politicians learn that pandering to this volatile group will not endear them to you!

So true! Unfortunately Smeg is only out $119 million. WE will be out billions more due to this pandering in the form of freebies for IA's. I watched that IA crying her crocodile tears, being held like a baby by the Vulture Gloria (what a pi$$ poor act THAT was ) as she opened that HUGE bung hole of mouth crying the blues about her "mistreatment". Believe me if it had been one of us who had "mistreated" an IA, Gloria would be no where to be found!

Originally Posted by GoodOleDays

Can't the GOP give us anything better than this?! Geezzzzzzzz!

I'm a bit skeptical about this sign. Why would prop 187 even be mentioned? Was she in office when that was debated?