Immigration, Loss Of Culture Worries Nations

Washington times

Article published Oct 5, 2007
Immigration, loss of culture worry nations


October 5, 2007


By Jennifer Harper - Americans are not the only people on the planet who are wary of immigration and protective of their national culture. So is everybody else.

A wide-ranging "global attitudes" survey of more than 45,000 people in 47 countries released yesterday by the Pew Research Center finds assorted populations are warm to the benefits of global trade. But they're cool — downright chilly in some cases — toward the toll it could exact on their national identities.

Majorities in every country agreed that international trade was positive — ranging from a low of 59 percent in the U.S. to an enthusiastic 90 percent and more in China, Israel and seven other countries.

Nagging concerns persist, though.

"In today's rapidly changing world, people from nations rich and poor worry about losing their traditional culture. In 46 out of 47 countries, majorities say their traditional way of life is getting lost," the poll said.

Some are more worried than others.

While 73 percent of American respondents fretted about the trend, the sentiment was more pronounced in Britain, France, Germany and Spain. It was more than 90 percent in South Korea and Bangladesh. Concern for loss of tradition, however, was less strident in many Middle Eastern countries, at 51 percent among Palestinians and 53 percent in Jordan.

Sweden, at 49 percent, was the lone exception to the finding.

Should each country guard their innate culture and lifestyle? The answer was a rousing "yes" — again in 46 out of 47 of the countries. In the U.S., 62 percent said we should protect our way of life. Those sentiments were more pronounced among Republicans (71 percent) than Democrats (60 percent).

The number was just more than half in Britain, France and Germany, but 90 percent in Egypt, Indonesia and India.

Perils of immigration concerned people in 44 out of the 47 countries, where the majority of respondents said immigration should be more restricted in their homelands.

Only Japanese, South Koreans and Palestinians were comfortable with their immigration policies. Three-quarters of the American respondents wanted more restrictions; similar findings were revealed in Spain, Britain and Russia.

But Yankee hospitality also persists.

"Americans and Canadians continue to be generally more welcoming to newcomers than Europeans," the survey said. In the immigration popularity poll, Asians are more welcome in the U.S. than those from Latin America, 61 percent to 57 percent.

God also is welcome in many spots. When asked whether people "must believe in God to be moral," 57 percent of Americans agreed — along with strong majorities in the Middle East (except Israel), Africa, the Far East (with the exception of Japan and China) and South America (except Argentina). Less than a majority agreed in all European countries — with only 10 percent agreeing in Sweden.

The survey was conducted April 3 to May 23 and had a margin of error of three percentage points.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/ ... 50075/1002

WE HAVE ALWAYS HAD "GLOBAL TRADE". EVEN IN THE BEGINNING DAYS OF OUR COUNTRY WE TRADED WITH OTHER NATIONS BY SHIP.

THERE IS NO REASON TO GIVE UP OUR BORDERS FOR "GLOBAL TRADE". WE HAD BORDERS AND GLOBAL TRADE SINCE DAY ONE....AND WE CAN CONTINUE TO DO THIS. WE DO NOT NEED TO PUT TRADE ON A FAST TRACK.

THE FAST TRACK TRADE ONLY BENEFITS BIG BUSINESS, NOT THE MASSES. WHAT BIG BUSINESS REALLY WANTS IS TO DISSOLVE BORDERS, TRADE LAWS AND LABOR LAWS TO BENEFIT THEMSELVES SO THEY CAN MAKE EVEN MORE MONEY.

BUT GLOBAL TRADE CAN EXIST WITHOUT THE FAST TRACK FACTOR THAT WOULD DESTROY NATIONS AND CULTURES.

This ought to be good for cultural anthropologists who fret about cultures losing their distinctive identities. I doubt that that many people would give up convenience to preserve a certain way of life, but they will probably want to hold on to certain tradtions for entertainment and sentimental reasons.

People all over the world are hungering for Western technology, especially in medical care. The arguments that some academics level at Western nations for being "exploitative" should be negated by the current overflowing of our wealth of scientific and industrial capabilities to other peoples who want to improve their standard of living.