Thread: NC deportation case highlights child welfare maze

Posted on: 3:01 pm, March 9, 2012, by Ryan Sullivan

RALEIGH, N.C. — When immigration agents deported Felipe Montes to Mexico two years ago, his three young sons were left in the care of their mentally ill, American-born mother in a small North Carolina mountain town.


Despite immigration policies that allow for the release of primary caregivers, federal authorities worked swiftly to expel Montes. Within two weeks, social workers placed the boys in foster care.


Child welfare officials are now asking a judge to strip Montes of his parental rights, reasoning it’s better for the children to live with strangers in the country where they were born than with their father in Mexico. Such a ruling could clear the way for their adoption.


That would be unfathomable to Montes, whose only brushes with the law were a string of traffic violations.


“I don’t drink, I don’t smoke, I don’t use drugs,” said
Montes, 32, who crossed the border illegally in 2003 to work on Christmas tree farms. “I have always taken care of my children, I have always loved them. And now, the social services people want to take away my rights and give my children away to strangers.”

Montes’ lawyer says the father is at risk of being deemed an unfit parent solely because of his immigration status.


Like thousands of deported parents whose children were taken in by the foster care system, Montes is barred from returning to visit his kids or attend court hearings on their future. He wants his boys to live with him in El Encino, a small village in the Mexican state of Tamaulipas, but county officials have declined to allow it.
“I can’t see them. I can’t give them a hug. It’s very depressing,” Montes said by phone from Mexico.


U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials say their intent is not to break up families, but there’s no system to allow detained parents to make decisions about their children or reunite with them. Legal experts say parents often lose custody solely due to immigration problems — and not abuse or neglect.


A 2011 report from the Applied Research Center, a New York-based racial justice think tank, found about 5,100 children in 22 states were in foster care after their parents were either detained or deported. The government doesn’t compile national numbers on such separations.


The report — based on surveys with child welfare caseworkers, attorneys, judges and immigrants — concludes that immigration officers often refuse to allow parents to make arrangements for their children. Once in ICE custody, parents are often denied access to family court hearings, phones and attorneys. Many don’t even know what happened to their children.


“Once parents are deported, they’re considered fallen off the face of the earth,” said Seth Wessler, the report’s principal investigator. “Family reunification tends to go out the door.”


Such separations are enough of a problem that immigration advocates urge parents to prepare kits with children’s passports and medical records or to sign documents allowing others to care for the children.


Three years after Montes came to the U.S., he married a North Carolina native and the couple rented a trailer near Sparta, a town of about 2,000. The marriage made him eligible for legal immigration status, but he didn’t undertake the lengthy, expensive process.


While he worked at a landscaping company, his wife stayed at home. Still, Montes was the primary caregiver for 4-year-old Isaiah and 2-year-old Adrian — and both were sent to daycare while he worked. His wife was eight months pregnant with their third baby, Angel, when Felipe was detained.


Drew Jackson, the court-appointed lawyer for the wife, said 31-year-old Marie Montes collects federal disability for a mental illness that prevents her from working. He declined to say what her diagnosis is.


“Felipe was the caregiver for the family, the one that supported everybody, made the money and took care of the kids,” Jackson said. “Marie is from a very poor family, and they’re not really in a position to help. Between that and her mental problems, she’s just not in a position to support three children without her husband.”


Felipe Montes’ legal problems began in 2007 when the state passed a law requiring a valid Social Security number to get a driver’s license. Previously, a federal taxpayer ID was accepted.


Unable to renew his license, Montes said he tried to avoid driving. But he had to get to work.


Soon, the town’s seven-person police force knew him by sight.
“They would stop me simply because they knew me, they knew my face and knew that I didn’t have a license,” Montes said.


Police Chief Bob Lane confirmed that his officers sometimes pulled Montes solely because they recognized him. In little more than two years, court records show Montes was cited more than two dozen times for driving with an expired license, an expired registration and without insurance.


In September 2009, a judge sentenced Montes to probation. A year later, he was detained by immigration agents after reporting for a probation meeting. A month after that, he was put on a plane to Mexico.


“They took me away and didn’t let me say goodbye to my wife or to my kids,” Montes said. “They didn’t give me the opportunity to say anything or make any arrangements.”


Federal authorities can release people for humanitarian reasons that include being the primary caregiver of minors. In Montes’ case, ICE knew he had children and assumed his wife could care for them. The agency said it didn’t communicate with Child Protective Serices about him.


ICE officials said it’s not their job to call child welfare officials every time they detain a parent. They don’t have a formal policy for dealing with child welfare agencies, but they work with them as needed.
Two weeks after Montes’ deportation, social workers took the children after his wife’s electricity and heat were cut off. The older boys were sent to live with one foster family, the newborn with another.


John Blevins, director of Alleghany County Department of Social Services, said in a written statement that his agency’s chief mission is to protect children from abuse, but reuniting families is also a priority.
But the agency balked at sending the Montes children to live in Mexico, where Montes works at a walnut farm and shares a house with his uncle, aunt and three nieces.


A home study by Mexican social services authorities shows the Montes family’s cement block house in Mexico has a refrigerator, satellite television, microwave and plenty of space for children to play. There’s a school a few minutes away.


But North Carolina officials are concerned it doesn’t have running water. Officials also said Montes missed some scheduled calls with his children at their day care, or called on the wrong days. Montes has a cell phone, but service can be spotty in rural Mexico.


“I will argue to the judge that some of the things they’ve asked him to do are legally impossible,” said Donna Shumate, Montes’ court-appointed lawyer in Sparta. She recounted a conversation with a lawyer for Alleghany County who questioned why authorities would ever “exile” children to a foreign country when they can stay.


Efforts have shifted to terminating his parental rights — the main barrier to reunification with the children being Montes’ current residence in another country, according to court documents.


Legal experts say that once U.S.-born children of immigrants are in the child welfare system, the aencies often refuse to send them to live with deported parents in other countries.


The foster couple caring for the older boys has expressed an interest in adopting them, Shumate said.


She’s working to obtain dual citizenship for the children, in case they’re allowed to join their father in Mexico. Marie’s lawyer said the mother also supports sending the kids to their father, and she hopes to join them and reunite with her husband.


A family court hearing is set for April 5.


“I don’t know what the judge will decide, but I’m hoping for the best,” Felipe Montes said. “I hope I can have my children back.”

NC deportation case highlights child welfare maze | MyFOX8.com

"The marriage made him eligible for legal immigration status, but he didn’t undertake the lengthy, expensive process."

So instead he risks losing his kids and having them adopted by strangers. Was it worth ignoring the law?

It's always someone else's fault. Illegals never want to accept responsibility for their actions.

I'm not up on the law but it seems to me if he sent 2 plane tickets and has relatives here they could fly to any border city to meet up. The kids would have birth certicates... and according to Calderone where there is a Mexican there is Mexico. They wouldn't turn away citizens, plus those children will be able to appeal for their families when they reach 18

nomas: It sounds like the children are U.S. citizens. I'm not sure what Mexico's policy would be to let them in to be with their father.

There are Mexican consulates everywhere and in addition of running matricular dispensaries, they could grant dual citizenship and help the kids join their father in Mexico.

this story saddens me terribly. While I stand firmly against illegal immigration, I firmly believe in cases like this the children should be with their parents. I think unless there is a compelling and explicit reason to terminate parental rights it should never be done. Especially when it is based on who can better provide shiny baubles for the kids, strangers or their parents. If they are doing this now, what is to stop them from going after children of citizens when someone with more money decides they want to adopt them? No, this is a no-brainer. Buy these kids a ticket to their father in Mexico.

I have NO sympathy for the father, he made his choice to do things Illegally and Broke the Law...since the American mom has been "deemed" mentally-ill, the boys should go live with him in Mexico, but by NO means should they be allowed to bring the father here..

This is Precisely why this "Birthright citizenship" is STUPID and should END...so Illegal aliens can by NO MEANS give birth to American children..the children in this case, Should be Mexican...their mom is american, but she clearly isnt in the picture...so their only other parent is an Illegal, making them mexican..

All the confusion would stop and not exist, If birthright citizenship didn't exist.

I wasn't just thinking of the father in this case. Sometimes I think children's services are worse abusers than the parents they pulled the children from. With the exception of the baby, these children are being put through emotional hell.