Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040

    Bill to criminalize presence of illegal immigrants AZ.

    Bill to criminalize presence of illegal immigrants

    Jacques Billeaud -
    Mar. 2, 2010 10:24 AM
    Associated Press .

    Over the last several years, immigration hard-liners at the Arizona Legislature persuaded colleagues to criminalize the presence of illegal border-crossers in the state and ban soft immigration policies in police agencies - only to be thwarted by a Democratic governor's vetoes.

    This year, their prospects have improved: A proposal containing those two enforcement ideas has momentum, and even opponents expect the current Republican governor to approve the changes.

    Among other things, the proposal would make Arizona the only state to criminalize the presence of illegal immigrants through an expansion of its trespassing law.

    The proposal won passage in the Senate two weeks ago. A similar bill could come to a vote of the full House as early as this week.
    ---
    On the Net:

    Arizona Legislature: www.azleg.gov/

    http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/ ... rants.html
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member vistalad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    3,036
    This is very good news.

  3. #3
    Senior Member WorriedAmerican's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    4,498
    Quote Originally Posted by vistalad
    This is very good news.
    EXCELLENT for Arizona!
    Hopefully Maine will give up on the Democrat Jokers we have running our Sanctuary State and vote in a Conservative!
    If Palestine puts down their guns, there will be peace.
    If Israel puts down their guns there will be no more Israel.
    Dick Morris

  4. #4
    Senior Member ICEstorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    270
    Not that I disagree with this, but how will the the state of Arizona arrest someone for being on state territory and also being an illegal immigrant when the Federal Gov has said that Arizona no longer has the authority to determine who is in the COUNTRY illegally?

  5. #5
    Senior Member FedUpinFarmersBranch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,603
    AZ may criminalize presence of illegal immigrants
    Posted: Mar 02, 2010 3:16 PM CST
    Updated: Mar 02, 2010 3:16 PM CST

    By JACQUES BILLEAUD

    PHOENIX (AP) - Over the past several years, immigration hard-liners at the Arizona Legislature persuaded their colleagues to criminalize the presence of illegal border-crossers in the state and ban soft immigration policies in police agencies - only to be thwarted by vetoes from a Democratic governor.

    This year, their prospects have improved. A proposal to draw local police deeper into the fight against illegal immigration has momentum, and even opponents expect the new Republican governor to sign off on the changes.

    The proposal would make Arizona the only state to criminalize the presence of illegal immigrants through an expansion of its trespassing law. It also would require police to try to determine people's immigration status when there's reasonable suspicion they are in the country illegally.

    An estimated 460,000 illegal immigrants live in the state.

    "The greatest threat to our neighborhoods is the illegal alien invasion," said Republican Sen. Russell Pearce of Mesa, sponsor of the proposal, explaining that some illegal immigrants who are criminals bring violence and other crimes to the United States.

    Supporters say the new rules are needed because the federal government has done a lousy job of trying seal the border and crack down on immigrants in the country's interior. Opponents say such new duties would be costly and lead to racial profiling.

    The proposal passed the Senate two weeks ago, and a similar bill could come to a vote of the full House as early as this week.

    Paul Senseman, spokesman for Republican Gov. Jan Brewer, said the governor doesn't comment on pending legislation but generally supports pragmatic immigration laws. Her predecessor, Janet Napolitano, a Democrat, vetoed similar proposals.

    Many of the state's local police bosses have long resisted suggestions that their officers conduct day-to-day immigration enforcement, saying it would distract them from investigating other crimes and sow distrust among immigrants, who might not help officers investigating crimes because they fear being sent home.

    "We are not anti-immigration enforcement," said Kingman Police Chief Robert DeVries, who opposes the bill. "We are just concerned about some of the responsibilities that are being pushed on us and how it affects our ability to provide day-to-day services in our communities."

    Immigrant rights advocates are especially concerned about the trespassing expansion, saying it would inevitably lead to hassles for U.S. citizens and legal immigrants who would be approached by police because of their skin color.

    "Bills like this that cast a net so wideare guaranteed to trap U.S. citizens," said Jennifer Allen, director of the Border Action Network, an immigrant rights group based in southern Arizona.

    Pearce said he doesn't see the trespassing expansion being used on a wide scale and said officers wouldn't be required to arrest all illegal immigrants under such a law. Pearce said officers could turn illegal immigrants over to federal authorities, as police now routinely do, or they could use the trespassing expansion to hold onto illegal immigrants who are suspects in crimes.

    First-offense trespassing by an illegal immigrant would be a top-tier misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail. Subsequent violations would be mid-tier felonies that would carry a penalty of one-and-a-half to three years in prison.

    One element of the proposal would ban what anti-immigration groups call sanctuary polices - local rules that discourage or restrict officers from questioning immigrants.

    Supporters of the bill say the policies - enacted by cities - create areas of "sanctuary" for illegal immigrants. The bill would let any person file a lawsuit to challenge the polices. If a judge finds a city restricted enforcement, the city could face civil penalties of $1,000 to $5,000 for each day the policy remains in effect after the lawsuit is filed.

    Democratic Rep. Kyrsten Sinema of Phoenix, an opponent of the measure, disputes that cities and counties have any written or de facto policies that make them sanctuaries. "It's just not true," Sinema said.

    ___

    On the Net:

    Arizona Legislature: http://www.azleg.gov/


    http://www.wqow.com/global/story.asp?s=12071473
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  6. #6
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  7. #7
    Senior Member immigration2009's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,118

    Immigration

    Too many legal immigrants enter the United States each year. Americans do not have jobs, so why continue with this legal immigration process? They (legal immigrants) must come to this country if our economy needs them. The current economic situation is not appropriate for more legal immigration. Reduce legal immigration. And one more thing, stop illegal immigration

  8. #8
    Bostwitz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    262
    Russell Pearse for President.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •