LIE: Obama Continues Tough Immigration Stance

ALIPAC NOTE: This article is such a lie.

Obama continues tough immigration stance

Published: Aug. 4, 2009 at 7:50 AM


Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano testifies before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing on "Identification Security: Reevaluating the REAL ID Act" on Capitol Hill in Washington on July 15, 2009. The Committee is examining the Act which is meant to encourage states to create more secure and reliable identification cards and drivers licenses. (UPI Photo/Roger L. Wollenberg) |


WASHINGTON, Aug. 4 (UPI) -- Advocacy and Hispanic groups say they are disappointed with U.S. President Barack Obama's continued aggressive enforcement of immigration rules.

Despite saying during his presidential campaign that he'd loosen some of the more controversially aggressive tactics toward illegal immigrants used by his predecessor, Obama and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano have largely continued them, opening rifts with Hispanic backers who were important in his election victory, The New York Times reported Tuesday.

"Our feelings are mixed at best," said Clarissa Martinez De Castro, immigration director of the National Council of La Raza. "We understand the need for sensible enforcement, but that does not mean expanding programs that often led to civil rights violations."

Napolitano, however, told the Times that TOUGH ENFORCEMENT IS NEEDED TO PERSUADE U.S. VOTERS TO ULTIMATELY ACCEPT NEW LAWS THAT WILL GIVE LEGAL STATUS TO MILLIONS OF ILLEGALS, perhaps late this year or early next year.

"We are expanding enforcement, but I think in the right way," she said. "We will continue to enforce the law and to look for effective ways to do it. That's my job."

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/08/04/ ... 249386652/

The word "LIE" was added to the title of this post by ALIPAC. The words I placed in capital letters were my reason for posting it.

Napolitano, however, told the Times that TOUGH ENFORCEMENT IS NEEDED TO PERSUADE U.S. VOTERS TO ULTIMATELY ACCEPT NEW LAWS THAT WILL GIVE LEGAL STATUS TO MILLIONS OF ILLEGALS, perhaps late this year or early next year.


Is she kidding? Accept? Never

Does NCLR also have a deportation director?

Obama's stance is the same he is just biding his time.

Quote:

---

The New York Times reported Tuesday.

---

The New York Slimes owned by Carlos Slime...what else needs to be said?

Janet is not enforceing the laws...deporting violent criminals only is not good enough,the others are breaking the law by being here and most are using fraudulant ID to work( More than likely an Americans ID) and

THE BORDER IS NOT CLOSED!!!

The same smoke and mirrors as we witnessed from our past President; claim to be Enforcing our Immigration Laws and Securing our National Borders while only implementing a “Dog and Ponyâ€

Obama on illegal-immigration offensive

Policies reflecting a tougher stance on enforcement

By Julia Preston

NEW YORK TIMES NEWS SERVICE
2:00 a.m. August 4, 2009

After early pledges by President Barack Obama that he would moderate the Bush administration's tough policy on immigration enforcement, his administration is pursuing an aggressive strategy for an illegal-immigration crackdown that relies significantly on programs started by his predecessor.

A recent blitz of measures has antagonized immigrant groups and many of Obama's Latino supporters, who opened a national campaign against them with small street protests in New York and Los Angeles last week.

The administration recently undertook audits of employee paperwork at hundreds of businesses, expanded a program to verify worker immigration status that has been widely criticized as flawed, bolstered a program of cooperation between federal and local law enforcement agencies, and rejected proposals for legally binding rules governing conditions in immigration detention centers.

“We are expanding enforcement, but I think in the right way,â€

[quote]“After 20 years of broken promises, it takes a lot more than token gestures,â€

Please help Lou!


http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-165543.html

The One World Government FREAKS or in this case FREAK has made a comment in favor of no borders and that North and South America should form a EU type of Union on the second link but I do not agree:

http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/ ... ?uniontrib

The One World Government supported by the past and current Presidents along with BLANKET AMNESTY again supported by both with the interference of the U.N. will lead the United States to become just another Third World Country whose only purpose will be to provide CHEAP LABOR for the Elitist Politicians and their Elitist Political Contributors. NAFTA was a success for the Elitist whose bottom lines increased and the EU form for North and South America would even be better for the Elitist but the vast majority of U.S. Citizens would obtain Third World Status.

[quote="lccat"]The same smoke and mirrors as we witnessed from our past President; claim to be Enforcing our Immigration Laws and Securing our National Borders while only implementing a “Dog and Ponyâ€

The point is we will lose our sovereignty as a nation but I suppose to Elitists that is OK as long as they get their One World Government. For Elitist, self-described moderates, socialists, and Marxist and most of their ilk “destroyingâ€