Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree6Likes
  • 3 Post By Judy
  • 3 Post By ALIPAC

Thread: NumbersUSA Backs House DACA Amnesty Bill: ‘No Way’ Congress Will Give Us E-Verify, En

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member lorrie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Redondo Beach, California

    NumbersUSA Backs House DACA Amnesty Bill: ‘No Way’ Congress Will Give Us E-Verify, En

    NumbersUSA Backs House DACA Amnesty Bill: ‘No Way’ Congress Will Give Us E-Verify, End Chain Migration ‘Without Trade-Offs’

    11 Jan 2018

    “If this bill passes as is, we will be in a better position,” said Rosemary Jenks, the director of government relations for NumbersUSA, of the Republican-led Securing America’s Future (SAF) Act. The proposed bill grants amnesty for illegal alien recipients of the Obama administration’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

    Jenks explained her organization’s support for the GOP’s legislative proposal, spearheaded by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), on Wednesday’s edition of Breitbart News Tonight with Breitbart Senior Editors-at-Large Rebecca Mansour and Joel Pollak on SiriusXM.

    The SAF Act includes three critical components, said Jenks: 1. Ending chain migration; 2. Ending the visa lottery; and 3. A national mandate for E-Verify use by employers.

    “NumbersUSA has opposed every amnesty that has been proposed in Congress since our founding in 1996. We are going to actually endorse Chairman Goodlatte’s bill, and the reason we are doing that is because it includes our top three priorities, and our top three priorities are ending chain migration, ending the visa lottery, and mandating E-Verify. Those are the three things that will most help American workers and most help raise their wages,” said Jenks.

    NumbersUSA’s ongoing support for the SAF Act is contingent on the aforementioned three critical components, said Jenks: “We are ready and fully prepared to reverse our position in a heartbeat if they start picking apart this bill.”

    Drawing on the adage of not letting the perfect become the enemy of the good, Jenks explained a broad rationale for her organization’s support of the SAF Act: “The Goodlatte bill is as close as you’re going to get in these political times to keeping President Trump’s promises.”

    Employment opportunities within the underground economy, said Jenks, are a primary magnet for illegal immigration. Implementation of an E-Verify mandate, she added, is crucial to minimize this draw.

    “Roughly half of all illegal aliens in the United States came on a legal visa and overstayed, so the wall’s not going to stop that. What is going to stop it is taking away the jobs. So if they can’t come here and get a job and support their families, they’re not going to come, or they’re going to leave,” said Jenks, referring to the importance of E-Verify in reducing illegal immigration.

    Congress is under “too much” political pressure by agricultural interests to maintain a flow of immigrant laborers, said Jenks, explaining a source of opposition to any E-Verify mandate: “The fact is that the politics in Congress, right now, means that we can’t get mandatory E-Verify unless there’s an expanded agricultural [guest worker] program, and by ‘expanded’ I mean easier for the growers to use than our current system, because members of

    Congress have too much pressure from growers on them to do mandatory E-Verify without doing an agricultural guest worker program.”

    As an overture to agricultural interests’ desire for a flow of foreign laborers, the SAF Act creates a new “agricultural guest worker program” to offset the bill’s proposed E-Verify mandate for employers.

    Existing law for the agricultural guest worker program, said Jenks, is “numerically unlimited.” The SAF Act, she added, proposes a cap of 500,000 per year.

    The SAF Act, noted Mansour, increases the annual volume of work visas for ostensibly “skilled workers,” in addition to the new visa program for agricultural guest workers. Jenks explained that accepting such an increase was a necessary compromise to secure the aforementioned three critical components: “You’re right. This is a compromise. There is basically no way that this Congress is going to give us total elimination of chain migration, elimination of the visa lottery, and E-Verify without trade-offs.”

    The SAF Act, acknowledged Jenks, does not guarantee construction of a southern border wall: “We don’t have any guarantee in this bill that we’re going to get a wall. There’s no guarantee because there’s no funding. This isn’t an appropriations bill, it’s an authorization bill. It authorizes additional wall, but doesn’t fund it. So Congress is going to have to come back and fund it.”

    Asked by Mansour if the SAF Act could “spiral out” and expand beyond its stated parameters via subsequent lawsuits and left-wing judicial activism, Jenks answered in the affirmative: “There’s a huge concern that this could spiral. If the Democrats and some of the Senate Republicans have their way, it absolutely will spiral out of control.”

    “The courts can always violate the law and their oaths of office and whatever,” said Jenks, “but I think this is written clearly enough that the Supreme Court would uphold it, and I do think we will get the changes, not just the amnesty.”

    Limiting the SAF Act’s scope to a “limited, definable population” — specifically illegal aliens targeted DACA — would greatly diminish the possibility of the fraud, said Jenks: “In the 1986 amnesty, it’s estimated that in the agricultural worker program, the agricultural worker amnesty, that fraud was as high as 70%. You had people saying that they worked in agriculture picking cherries out of the ground and picking watermelons off the trees, and they got amnesty… Amnesty programs are by their definition susceptible to fraud.”

    In response to a question regarding President Donald Trump’s comments about the scope of a potential DACA amnesty, Jenks speculated that President Trump might be getting conflicting information from amnesty-supporting Republicans: “They’re all trying to push [Trump] in the wrong direction, and he’s hearing all this, and it doesn’t surprise me at all that there may be some confusion, and he doesn’t necessarily have a full grasp of what the exact numbers are or exactly where we should be going, but I think his instincts are good.”

    The NumbersUSA website lists the components contained within the SAF Act’s current draft.

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty
    by joining our E-mail Alerts at

  2. #2
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Hey NumbersUSA, you are supporting and submitting to FOREIGN AGENT AMNESTY BLACKMAIL. It's unconstitutional, it's illegal in every form, manner and purpose. Every person in the United States is protected by the equal protection, uniform naturalization and ex post facto clauses of the US Constitution and amnesty to any illegal alien for any reason while the laws they broke continue in full force and effect against others violates all three of those clauses of the US Constitution. It's unfair to US citizens, legal immigrants, other illegal aliens, and foreign nationals who have or who are in the process of applying for legal entry into the United States. It violates all of our civil rights protected by the US Constitution.

    Americans pay trillions to our government to do its job. Americans pay billions to Congress to do its job. Americans also pay NumbersUSA and other anti-immigration organizations a lot of money to help us lobby for enforcement of our immigration laws. We do not spend all this money to hear any of you from the White House to the Congress to the Courts to our 501 C 4 and 501 C 3 organizations telling US the only way to stop illegal immigration is to submit to the black mail by foreign drug cartels that violate our basic, fundamental civil rights in order to do so.

    Now pull your head out of your books and stand up with US against drug-cartel funded AMNESTY BLACKMAIL.
    Last edited by Judy; 01-11-2018 at 04:28 PM.
    Beezer, hattiecat and lorrie like this.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at

  3. #3
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Last edited by JohnDoe2; 01-11-2018 at 06:07 PM.

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.

    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here

  4. #4
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Boooooo! NumbersUSA probably met with Stephen Miller and Trump at the White House like we are hearing and got sucked into this thing. Very bad move by NumbersUSA. I'll never support them again.
    Beezer, hattiecat and lorrie like this.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Similar Threads

  1. Republican House Bill Exchanges DACA Amnesty for Mandatory E-Verify, Legal Immigratio
    By GeorgiaPeach in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-11-2018, 03:58 PM
  2. Warn all Republicans in Congress not to merge DACA Amnesty with spending bill
    By ALIPAC in forum illegal immigration Announcements
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-04-2017, 04:43 PM
  3. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-13-2017, 09:46 AM
    By LawEnforcer in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-01-2010, 04:25 PM
  5. Senate Backs Bill to Give D.C. a Vote in Congress
    By Texas2step in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-26-2009, 11:46 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts